Obama Administration's War Against The Second Amendment...

Weak really. This is nothing more than you SAYING that these two appointees are "anti-gun", as if this were enough.

Fail.

A program that we still know little about as it is still early in the discovery process. We certainly don't know if this involved incompetence, defensible strategy, nefarious intent, or even political motivations.

Fail.

You mean the treaty that you previously admitted does not actually exist and thus does not include the sort of fearful restrictions you have previously stated? The one that would NOT allow for the sorts of restrictions you have fearfully proclaimed due to our Constitution? THAT one?

Fail.

Hardly a restrictive regulation, friend. You could easily offset that regulation with his signing into law the lifting of restrictions on carying guns in national parks. Even Steven.

Fail again.

 

I believe I will start reporting your posts unless you have something constructive to add.

 

They are very constructive

Just because you do not like them is a reportable offense

Last I checked this is NOT the Daily Kos

 

They offer no substance to the debate.

We are talking about the imagined war on 2nd Amendment, we are not talking about choosing to be a gun over instead of a victim, nor are we talking about a collection consisting of a Hi-Power or a M9.

 

The do offer substance, but you have decided to ignore it

 

Nope. I'll report any more spam.

 

Here ya go!!!!

 

Done and done.

 

Did you know the anti gun nuts have strong supporters who are finally speaking out?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo[/ame]

 

I am not aware of any firearm registration from that period.

 

Yes, the facts do back my statement up. They have been posted before.

 

They both have anti-gun records and Sotomayor voted agaisnt over-turning the Chicago gun ban. Kagan would have if she were part of it.

A scandal YOU refuse to know anything about.

Just the fact that the Obama Admin supports this is enough to see where he stands on guns.

Not restrictive for you.

 

We are talking about the very real and factual war on the Second Amendment.

 

All gun owners/Second Amendment supporters should have those signs.

 

So true. More gun control means less resistance for these dudes. I wish the libs could see it that way, but they don't.

 

Like Anti-Zionist Bigotry spam ?

 

Hell, some of them made their own (From Scratch)

 

When God created Eve, Adam lost 50% his individualism. Shame, really, he had to go and do that.

 

Please provide proof that they did.

 

Check it out. A big sign saying "I have many valuable, portable and easily pawnable items in my house! Please come in when I'm not home and steal my guns!".

You boys go right ahead and put those signs up. We liberals will thank you for making your own house the mark. Being intelligent, we prefer not to advertise about our guns. I mean, we don't have to make our house impregnable. We just have to make it less of a target than your house.

 

Exactly my thoughts.

 

Gun Fight
[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Gunfight-Battle-over-Right-America/dp/0393077411"]Amazon.com: Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America (9780393077414): Adam Winkler: Books[/ame]

An excellent read.

 

Of course, we should all advertise valuables in our homes!

Makes total sense!

 

[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Gunfight-Battle-over-Right-America/dp/0393077411/"]Amazon.com: Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America (9780393077414): Adam Winkler: Books[/ame]

Check it out if you interested in a point of view far removed from the ignorance of the Brady Campaign and the paranoid delusions of the NRA.

 

You already said that and I replied that your SAYING this does not automatically make it so.

The Opinion went far beyond a simple city ordinance, friend. The majority Opinion dealt with complicated legal issues that you clearly are not apprised of. The fact that she joined a dissenting Opinion does NOT mean that she is "anti-gun".
I can't even begin to address your silly assumption as to Kagan.

I am fully aware of what I do not know. Do you?

The President supports addressing the illegal international small arms trafficking. What YOU have read into this is entirely your own slanted and agenda-driven ideology.

Hardly a restrictive regulation, friend. You could easily offset that regulation with his signing into law the lifting of restrictions on carrying guns in national parks. Even Steven.