CRUZ: He had a good opener took the usual Pres. Candidate tone thru-out. He dodged some on ISIS and hes for carpet bombing, but weve had smart bombs for decades etc. He said wed finance all this w/ a booming economy but this not what we have now. He was out of line w/ C. Wallace, and Wallace put him in his place. But, just after this, he complained about the rules, etc. and threatened to leave the stage. (He made multiple mistakes here, esp. after criticizing Trump for not showing up.) He wants to repeal ALL of Obamacare, but its unclear, (to me) how hell insure ppl, esp. the now uninsured, and also how a person whod lost their job continue to afford to take their Insurance w/ them. Rubio and Paul made it clear that he flip-flopped on Immigration, and that he worked w/ GWB on Immigration in TX yrs. ago. (He didnt do so well here.) He gave good answers on Electability and on Ethanol, but hes known for not working well w/ Congress, etc. He had some good moments, but not his best performance. RUBIO: He had a good opener, and attacked BHO and HRC, and was somewhat dramatic thru-out. He gave a good answer on ISIS, and said hed jail Terrorists in Gitmo. Hes now taking a hard line on Illegal Immigration, but the Mods, and other Candidates pointed out that he DID flip-flop on Immigration, (at least twice). He made the same promises weve heard for many yrs; the 700 mi of fence was supposed to have been built during GWBs time as Pres. Also, the accurate and efficient E-Verify Program has existed for yrs, but most Employers dont use it, (including and esp. Federal Contractors, and NO thanks to Obama for not having the spine to make it a requirement for them.) He evaded the question on his criticism of Christie on Sotamayor. He said hed tear up the Iran Nuke Deal, but his statement, and this deal is irrelevant, as Iran will continue regardless, and could easily make/acquire Nuclear Weapons covertly. A good performance overall. BUSH: Fairly good opener. He was the most glad of all Candidates that Trump wasnt there. He gave a good answer on ISIS, but a No-Fly Zone, (in Syria) is now impossible due to Russias presence. He gave a very good answer on Veterans Care. Hes flip-flopped, and now against Puerto Rico Statehood and gave a confusing/conflicting answer as he mentioned self-determination but added, w/ US Federal Help. Like some of the others, he supports a path to legal status, but not Citizenship. Theyre all playing word games here, this could mean Amnesty, or not. (Illegals do have a degree of legal status here now as some states will issue them Non-Resident Drivers Permits instead of actual Drivers Licenses, and shows the mess created by our Fed Govts failure to enforce Immigration Laws, and the failures of our Do-Nothing Congress.) He did support Rubios Gang of 8' Bill at one time. He gave good answers on Dulce Candys question, and on Muslim tolerance. A good closer, and a fairly good performance overall. PAUL: He gave a good opener, and gave Cruz a couple of good jabs. He said, Syria is a problem but, of course, he failed to mention the decades of US meddling in the Region, etc. Hes introduced Legislation on Criminal Justice Reform, but didnt elaborate. Pauls also for a path to legal status for Illegals, and gave a good reply to Cruz on this. Hes Pro-Life, but gave a very elusive and confusing answer on whether the Feds, or the State would/should decide on Abortion. A good performance overall, he took advantage of his opportunity thanks to Trump not showing. Kasich: He gave a good opener, and cited his experience a Gov. thru-out. He was blown-off by Kelly, but she finally came back to him. Praised himself for helping Reagan rebuild the Military, and said the US shouldnt be the Police of the world, (I agree). He was asked a stupid question about going to Heaven . He gave a good answer on Mental Illness. He mentioned sanctions on Iran, but its too late for this no, (also, NO thanks to Obama). He was somewhat ignored by the Mods, but his best performance by far. Dr. C: Good opener. He said hes had more 2 AM calls than all others combined, (probably true, but these are calls for a Dr. NOT a Pres.) He stack mainly to comments on Islamic threats, and Islamophobia. He gave a good and Hawkish answer re Putin going into Estonia, said hed face him down, and honor NATOs Article 5, etc. And gave good answer on Ethanol. He was somewhat ignored by the Mods, but he was more assertive than usual, his best performance. Christie: Good opener, he was also citing his Gov. experience thru-out, as usual. He dodged on whether Cruz/Rubio were qualified to be Pres. Kelly had to correct him on Neighbors of the San Bernardino Shooters question. He only mentioned Planned Parenthood re Entitlement Reform, (Just one of many that need reforming.) As in last Debate, he gave a good comment on Washington DC nonsense after a Cruz/Rubio exchange. He waffled and evaded on whether KY Clerk who wouldnt sign Gay ppls Marriage Licenses should lose her job. He gave an evasive answer on if hed send troops to Libya. (A side-note: He evaded and lied his ass off on FOX last week regarding Sotamayor. Also, IMO, he KNEW about Bridgegate, etc.) A fair performance, hes stuck in the same old box. Mods: They did a good job overall, and kept the Candidates in line. They wasted debate time asking Paul about B. Clintons past behavior, and on asking Kasich the going to heaven one. They seemed to really enjoy posing for the cameras just before breaks, etc. This Debate reaffirms the need to ask ALL Candidates the same questions.