Old George Zimmerman MySpace page surfaces with apparent disparaging ethnic comments

I for one don't...

But people like RosePop, Puffin, Mac-7, John Cessna, among others feel that Trayvon's comments as a preteen have full bearing on this case...

No one but the usual suspects (Me, Margot, Sky, etc) seem to have much to say about that...

 

Well its not our problem that you have no understanding of the law. If you think for one second that Trayvons past, and he was just a little kid, will not be relevant, then you must have something wrong with you. Casey Anthony making out with chicks had nothing to do with killing her child, but they showed it in court to show character. So brace yourself now because I am sure there are tons of other pics of Tray-dawg the world hasn't seen yet. At this point his parents probably turned over his cell phone over to Vivid Entertainment hoping they can get dat cash because I have no doubts this kid taped himself in many disgusting situations, since he was the king of giving sex tips. Awwwww.

 

Z's lawyer has already admitted his myspace comments could be admissible. no worries. nobody ever actually believed your position was to wait for the outcome of the legal proceedings.

 

it isnt about age. Z's comments about "every Mexican" proves a history of profiling groups as criminals based on somatic qualities. wrongfully profiling is why this nightmare got started. Z didnt simply "suspect" T of being a criminal because his recorded call proves he had already convicted T before knowing anything about him. Im not saying the mere existence of comments makes them admissible. Im saying if there are relevant comments they will be admissible.

 

AND SO WILL TRAYVONS!!!! Sorry bud, but if we want to go tit for tat and play the retarded game of whos myspace is worse, its hand down Trayvon Martin in every possible way on earth, starting with showing what (*)(*)(*)(*) hole parents he had. He was doomed and failed from the get go and his myspace at 12 years old is (*)(*)(*)(*)ing disgusting. And no one did a (*)(*)(*)(*) thing about the obvious signs this kid was not headed down a good path. So make it about race and who is able to say certain words in the land of free speech but this all comes down to two losers who are scamming the world who raised an animal and you either are some bleeding heart, or actually identify with this kind of life.

 

The age of the comments will have to come into play...

The fact that they're 5 & 7 years old should make them irrelevent to the case...

 

Z brags about felonies and profiles people based on somatic qualities and you think that doesnt matter?? lol....

 

And of course, you have no proof of what his parents did or didn't do...

 

The age of the comments will definitely come into play as it shows Z has a history of violent assaults, bragging about beating them in court, and profiling groups as criminals.

 

They're 7 year old comments...

I'm not gonna presume to know whether he does or doesn't think like that now...

The point is, if Zimmerman's 7-year old Myspace comments can be any sort of valid indicator as to his guilt or innocence, then, that would mean that the defense could pull up Martin's 5-year old Myspace page and say, "Look, he'd definitely have attacked Zimmerman," and, I don't see how either case could hold water in court...

 

what comments did T make that are relevant to the case?

 

None, and that's my point about both cases...

 

but, your point has already been proven wrong by Omara admitting Z's comments could be admissible based on relevancy.

 

So you can't back up your lie. Got it.

Next time don't accuse someone of being biased when you can't back it up.

 

Link?

10char

EDIT: This is what I am seeing about it...

this is from the link Margot posted earlier...

*shrug*

Doesn't guarantee that they'll be admissible, and, I suspect the age of the posts will come into play on both sides...

 

lol....do you honestly think anybody believes you are not biased against T? seriously??? lol

 

I believe you claimed they would not be admissible. Omara has already said they could be and that is defense lawyer talk for oh crap.....what other dumb comments has my client made???

 

There have been cases where Facebook etc. posts have been used in court, but, as far as I know, they were recent and relevent to the case...

They were not 5-7 year old posts...

 

Dude!! Z's lawyer has already admitted his comments could be admissible. Stop trying to salvage what is a proven false claim.

 

Could be admissible...

Not will be...

Anything could be admissible...

I'd be willing to bet that the age of the posts comes into play...

Because if you admit one, you have to admit the other...

 

You claimed it would be "...useless in court." Z' s lawyer disagrees.

Admitting one does not automatically mean admitting the other because the only comments admissible would be those relevant. In this case, Z profiled someone as a criminal for no justifiable reason, confronted him, and ended up shooting him.

If there is anything in T's comments that are relevant they will be admissible as well.

 

I still they'l be useless in court, because, they're nearly a decade old...

Something I said or did 7 years wouldn't reflect on me at all now, because I'm an entirely different person...

 

When your kid is suspended from school 3 times in a matter of months and is at Daddys for one of them, and he ends up dead and its national news, you (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up as a parent. From age 12 that kid was a bad kid and they had access to his myspace, they could have done something, I have seen Sybrina Fultons hoochie mama no bra bandana wearing shirt trout face pouting to the camera, so they knew how to use the computer, they just didnt give a (*)(*)(*)(*). But I can tell you where they are today! Passing off Sybrinas big headed kid who is a father himself as a little kid who is in the make a wish foundation to go meet Caremlo and Lala! Trayvon would have wanted them to have fun huh? View attachment 12516 View attachment 12517 View attachment 12518

 

Anyone else find the butt hurt of Zimmerman defenders because of character attacks like this hilariously ironic?

Shall we drag up the countless attack threads on TM in the weeks following the incident? How about the hacked TM accounts by stormfront members? Where was the rage about pointless character attack threads then? (*)(*)(*)(*)ing hypocrits.

 

So, that's all you have to offer is another bull(*)(*)(*)(*) post?

Why am I not surprised?