Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

On The Impossibility Of Abiogenesis.

Discussion in 'Science' started by Grugore, Mar 8, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 42 of 42
  1. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That's an improper analogy.

    There is zero existing evidence.

    AA
     
    AboveAlpha, Jul 9, 2016
    #1026
  2. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes there is. As I said the complex genetic make is one of them. There's also the fine tuning of the universe and the golden meme ratio. Plus the simple fact that the possibility of it coming from chance is very very very very small.
     
    Maccabee, Jul 10, 2016
    #1027
  3. Maccabee

    Maccabee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    Messages:
    8,901
    Likes Received:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Similar structures could also be evidence of a common designer. As to the organ, it could be that man had a use for it but lost the ability due to the second law of thermodynamics.
     
    Maccabee, Jul 10, 2016
    #1028
  4. RandomObserver

    RandomObserver Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2016
    Messages:
    1,550
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Nice thought, but it fails because Adam, Eve, and first generation were farmers and herdsmen. They would have had no need for the vomeronasal organ if it had worked when Adam was created. Intelligent Design presumes that a perfect designer would install exactly the right organs to fit each of His creations. Are you suggesting that the designer was not perfect?
     
    RandomObserver, Jul 10, 2016
    #1029
  5. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    612
    Trophy Points:
    83
    This is not evidence.

    You do realize that the the Probability that a GOD existing that you would say created all life and the Universe exists at a MUCH HIGHER PROBABILITY than that of life evolving via bot Quantum and Biological Evolution from Inanimate Matter...right?

    You Do know this right?

    AA
     
    AboveAlpha, Jul 11, 2016
    #1030
  6. ChemEngineer

    ChemEngineer Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2016
    Messages:
    2,266
    Likes Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Abiogenesis is the subject, NOT "common structures, NOT "inherited body parts."

    Stop trying to derail the thread by changing the subject to one of your Darwinian Talking Points.
    That is SO unintelligent and anti-scientific of you people. But it seems to be all you have.

    Hundreds of complex proteins are necessary for the first single-cell organism to survive, much less reproduce.
    This has not and cannot be explained by any naturalistic means, much less "survival of the fittest" through "selection."
     
    ChemEngineer, Jul 11, 2016
    #1031
  7. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Post limit thread closure notification.

    Shangrila
    Moderator
     
    Shangrila, Jul 11, 2016
    #1032
Page 42 of 42
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page