our species is an anti-existence.

Discussion in 'Science' started by polscie, Jan 7, 2013.

  1. polscie

    polscie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    when our species was at the stage of a single cell, I personally consider it as fine, a living species part of this existence.

    but when it developed further and started discovering and inventing, I personally consider it, as a living species with an anti-existence character.

    why did I land into this conclusion?

    *this species practically thinks and acts as if it owns this existence.
    *this species names and labels those that are found in this existence.
    *this species even made this "law of physics."
    *this species claims, gravity, black hole, time, 4th dimension...etc.

    *this species even makes equation to the tune of energy is equal to mass multiplied by the speed of light squared.
    *this species is even making a claim that "time travel" is possible, can bend space, and even talks of space and time warping.

    *this species even says things like this..." A warp drive would manipulate space time itself to move a starship, taking
    advantage of a loophole in the laws of physics that prevent anything from moving faster than light.

    This species has been, since it invented letters and forming them into words, and sentences making
    a lot of noise of its ridiculous and unbelievable "scientific claims."

    All that this species has been doing is anti and against the sole interests of EXISTENCE.

    Truly, this species is anti-existence.
    This is my belief.


    EXISTENCE is what I called everything that is found/not found by this species.
     
  2. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was not our species , you really need to read a thing or two in the field of life and evolution.

    Kingdom: Animalia <--animals
    Phylum: Chordata <-- with a spine
    Class: Synapsida <-- with scull openings where their eyes fit
    Class: Mammalia <-- with specialised teeth
    Order: Primates <-- having nails instead of claws
    Family: Hominidae <-- apes
    ------------------------------------------------------------- <-- everything above this line is not human
    Tribe: Hominini <-- bipedal apes
    Genus: Homo <- with a cranial capacity over 600cm3
    Species: H. sapiens <-- us
     
  3. polscie

    polscie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0


    so out of the blue there was this Homosapiens?

    where do you think did this homosapiens come from?
     
  4. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Intermediate animals not out of the blue .
    My point is that single cell organisms are not "our" species , the term means something very limited so you better use "when life was at the stage of a single cell"
     
  5. polscie

    polscie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so what is the origin of H.sapiens. if not from the single cell?
     
  6. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I already posted the line , our species originates from bipedal apes with big brain volume not from bacteria , life as a whole originates from them .
     
  7. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, our species will clearly end its own existence within a couple of hundred years, so what's the problem?
     
  8. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not a creationist, and I haven't studied evolution in any great detail, but the leap from the great apes to homosapiens seems to be a giant one. When did the lights get switched on?
     
  9. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    We decided to do without instincts. It was a HUGE gamble! About the time we developed language, I'd guess.
     
  10. Iolo

    Iolo Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    8,759
    Likes Received:
    126
    Trophy Points:
    63
    When we decided to do without instincts. It was a HUGE gamble! About the time we developed language, I'd guess.
     
  11. Phoebe Bump

    Phoebe Bump New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    26,347
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Developing language was a huge event. I don't understand the mechanism for developing language. Seems like one of those on/off switch-type things to me. One day there is no language, the next day we're writing sonnets on cave walls.
     
  12. mutmekep

    mutmekep New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    6,223
    Likes Received:
    46
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There was never a leap but many small steps over thousands of species, what makes us different from the other grate apes is bipedalism and even if you go back 3 million years to Pithicanthropus Aferensis (Lucy) she may look like a chimp but she is more human than chimp if you examine her bones . To find a species with mixed characteristics you have to go back over 6 million years to Salehanthropus whose big toe was sideways and could grab on branches of trees .


    To develop language you need the proper voice box ,i am not sure if Erectus had a voice box capable of language but for sure our parent species Homo Rhodesiensis did ( and so do his child species us and Neanderthals) . The most ancient language is still in existence and it is used by the oldest nation the Bushmen of Kalahari , it is a whistling language .
    Hunters used whistles to communicate when they couldn't see each other ; whistling languages was probably brought into Asia and Europe with human migrations , a fun fact is that during the Median wars a Persian unit deserted the army and settled in an area in the Greek island of Euvoia , this unit used whistling language and even today the villagers of this area still do .
     

Share This Page