Out of 13,950 only 23 article peer reviewed articles dispute Man Made Climate Change

Then it is the God of Abraham against the false prophets in the Church of Man-made Global Warming.

Amen.

But many non-Christians are not fooled by the lib wackos either.

 

Then feel free to link us to the Times articles, we can do the research you seem incapable of

 

Oh, we're playing more "Warmist Make Believe"? What FUN!!

I see that, today, we're all supposed to be pretending that the blatant Warmist corruption of the entire "peer review" process hasn't been glaringly exposed, via their OWN internal communications, right??

Woohoooo!! What a hoot!! Warmist Make Believe sure is fun, isn't it?

 

Time Magazine April 8, 1977.

 

Those who deny Evolution are the same ones that deny AGW.

^^^ I rest my case.

 

Well here is a problem. There is no issue for that date

Here is the April 4th edition

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601770404,00.html

And April 11th

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601770411,00.html

Neither seem to have articles that support your claim.

 

REPENT!...THE END OF THE WORLD IS COMING!....REPENT!

SUBMIT & REMIT!....THE END OF THE WORLD IS COMING!....SUBMIT & REMIT!

Zero difference.

 

Lol, conservatives are against global warming because they are told to be against global warming. Screw science... Rush Limbaugh told me global warming is a liberal creation to push alternative energies (for some weird reason), therefore it doesn't exist!

 

Bummer.

The April 8 cover may be a hoax.

If so then the libs win this round.

But the hysteria over global cooling was real if short-lived.

 

Not true.

We are told by the lib media to support the man-made global warming myth.

But that is just manufactured hysteria by libs who want to grow the government.

Global warming may be real.

It's happened countless times in the past and always seems to come between periods of global cooling.

Imagine that.

 

yes, the liberal media is responsible for 13927 papers not being disputed. I guess Fox News should get credit for the other 23 right?

 

Man, you seem like a real life scientist! Amazing you believe you know what you are talking about, lol. The lib media doesn't tell us that global warming exists, scientists who study global warming tell us it exists. Only the fringe creepers at Fox News dispute science with no scientific proof whatsoever. You guys are basically a religion, not a credible party to run a country.

 

You know Mac, you seem fairly reasonable so lets take a few things at face value.

I don't really want government to get to big, because that is a sure way to have it run our lives. But I am not afraid of having the public in general make an educated decision on something as crucial as this. So far it seems mostly big business versus everyone else on the topic of global warming/climate change. Most of the scientists who disagree with the majority are being paid by some corporate firm who has a vested interest in preventing any change to the status quo.

In fact one of those scientists who questions sea temp readings and did his own analysis proved they were accurate and the Koch's helped fund that one, which was just one more puzzle piece in the whole picture.

Is Man totally to blame for the current warming trends? I doubt it, but has man played a part? I feel that is a certainty. I also think that to preserve the world for my grandkids I need to do something about it instead of just accepting what some corporate mouthpiece is telling me. I trust large corporations even less than our elected officials, because they have even fewer rules for any sort of public disclosure governing their activities. Though it goes hand in hand, the corporate lobbyist owns the congressmen/women, who are paid by corporate interests.

 

The lib media is not just reporting the news.

It is a propaganda machine for the man-made global warming crowd.

And obviously it has succeeded with you.

 

I dont watch the news. I get all my information from google news that has a wealth of different sources.

AGW is not propaganda. The only propaganda is comming from the rigth. And that propaganda is that AGW doesn't exist.

 

I agree that global warming may exist.

Or may not.

Libs keep getting caught fudging the data.

But heck, the earth is always warming or cooling so just toss a coin.

At any rate there is no conclusive proof that it is man-made or that it will hurt us more than global cooling would.

We could be at the beginning of a cooling period that would far worse for humans than global warming.

 

This is a flat our lie. Only 23 papers out of 13950 peer reviewed papers where disputed.

Give me a break.

 

Okay now I know what you are talking about - I have read the article myself. And the original paper published. At the time theory was sound but needed confirmation. With improved data from the upper Venusian atmosphere it was found the reflective attributes to carbon was over stated. The original scientist wrote the rebutle in the early 80's and pretty much killed his own theory.

 

You want to preserve the world exactly as it exists today when that is not natural.

The world has been much different in the past than it is today and will change in the future no matter what you do.

 

Incomplete information....

http://petesplace-peter.blogspot.com/2008/04/peer-reviewed-articles-skeptical-of-man.html

There's a hell of a lot more than 23.

There were Herbivore Dinosaurs and the vegetation to support them between 400 to 1200 miles from the North Pole about 60 Million years ago. The fossilized remains of both don't lie. Something cause the Earth to warm to that extent, man didn't exist and the fossils for oil were still walking around and growing from the ground. So what caused the Earth to warm that much? Since we know without speculation that the above warming existed without fossil fuels being burned due to the fossils being found there, the burden of proof is on the scientists to prove that the burning fossil materials is fueling the warming. So far none of them that I know of has put their careers on the line by stating an absolute YES, that burning fossil fuels is causing the latest warming trend. Please spare me the zippty doo da about exact science. We know through indisputable fact that there were Herbivore Dinosaurs and the vegetation to support them between 400 to 1200 miles from the North Pole about 60 Million years ago. If you can't prove the latest warm period it's man made, then you can't rule out that the same process isn't happening again.

 

Submit your studies to be peer reviewed, then we will talk about proof. Thanks!

 

Peer review is not credible because the review boards are packed with Warmers and skeptics are not allowed.

 

Sir, do you have a link? I'm wondering if Time was writing about Climate Change and mentioned there were anti-climate change scientists in an off-handed way.

 

We demand rigorous science, that's all.

Find me just one experiment where "Ho = climate change is a natural event" and is rejected. Only need one. I've been begging for this for years. Where is it?