Please watch quickly before it is censored

Belarus was a part of the GDL and Jews have not been playing a big role in the GDL

 

Belarus was also part of the commonwealth and if the Jews played no role why Cossacks specifically targeted them ?

 

Instead of which......

Religous Jews Annexing parts of North London

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/0...ties-planning-to-annex-parts-of-north-london/


I have fully confirmed the story below to be 100% truth and accurate.

And I confirmed it in person.

**

....as a symbolic boundary, consisting of poles connected by wire to form ‘gateways’, which will turn Bushey into an area where strict Sabbath rules are relaxed for orthodox Jews. They won’t now have to worry about being forbidden to carry or transport items like wheelchairs, pushchairs and handkerchiefs. The application was made on behalf of the Bushey United Synagogue.

The actual Planning application describes the scheme thus… “Erection of supporting poles and linking wires associated with the creation of an Eruv (continuous boundary designated in accordance with Jewish Law) in 25 locations around Bushey”.

The paperwork goes on to explain that “Jewish Law prohibits Orthodox Jews from carrying or transporting on the Sabbath day, but carrying is permitted within the defined boundary of an Eruv (plural: Eruvin), as is the use of pushchairs and wheelchairs.

“Although symbolic, an Eruv boundary has to have a physical continuity. It is formed by utilising continuous local features such as fences or walls alongside roads, railways or terraced buildings. However, where this continuity is breached, e.g. by roads or footpaths, then such a gap must be closed by the erection of a notional ‘gateway’. A gateway can consist of poles linked on top by a wire crossing the highway at a height of 5.5 metres in order to clear all vehicle traffic. Where the wire only crosses a pedestrian footpath the height of the wire is 2.5 metres.”

The Bushey Eruv is only the latest of several in North London. An Eruv has been approved and implemented in Borehamwood/Elstree. The London Borough of Barnet has approved two Eruvin, the first covering much of Hendon, Finchley and Golders Green, and the second, within Edgware and Hale wards. Further Eruvin are planned for Woodside Park and, further afield, in Greater Manchester.

Strong objections have been voiced and these include….

It would impose religious practices on the non-Jewish community.

The Eruv would promote one faith which is a minority in Bushey.

The Eruv would promote social exclusion.

The Eruv would impact property values.

The Eruv would creation a sense of ownership over the land within the Eruv.

The planning committee dismissed all these concerns and passed the proposal unanimously. The agenda papers included this officer comment: “As a symbolic boundary which only has spiritual significance, the Eruv itself is not a structure which requires planning permission and it is not for the Planning Committee to refuse or approve the Eruv as such.”

Hertsmere’s Portfolio Holder for Planning & Localism is a councillor who was educated at JFS, which describes itself as Europe’s largest and most successful Jewish secondary school and “committed to the development of students… who have a strong sense of identity with Judaism and Israel”.

The Watford Observer reported that the proposals met with fierce opposition from some residents. A public meeting was attended by hundreds, who called on Bushey United Synagogue to defer the Eruv application and allow for greater consultation between the orthodox Jewish community and wider Bushey population. “There was an overwhelming feeling that these discussions were too little, too late, as the meeting fell just nine days before the application was due to be heard before Hertsmere Borough Council’s planning committee,” said one resident.

She complained: “Sadly they decided not to give us more time, which has had all sorts of implications… One of the big issues from the beginning was the way it was getting pushed through without a proper consultation. They could have deferred the application and that would have made the difference to all of us.”

John Dowdle, Chair of Watford Area Humanists, said: “An Eruv enforces a religious identity on all others living within the religious boundary, whether they share those beliefs or not. I have serious concerns about the detrimental impact this could have on social cohesion. In Israel, people driving cars on Shabbat (Saturday) are subjected to stone throwing by ultra-orthodox religionists. Are we opening the way for this kind of behaviour in Britain?”

John Dowdle, Chair of Watford Area Humanists told, when directly asked about this...

"Yes, it is fully accurate. These eruvim have only come into existence in Britain over the last 10 years. Before that, they did not exist. If you want to find out how hollow the beliefs underlying these eruvim are, I will be chairing a meeting in Watford on Thursday on "The Film The BBC Banned".


Thin end of the wedge?



It seems that Jews in England can’t abide their own religious laws any more than their brethren in Israel can cope with international law and humanitarian law. Is this the thin end of a wedge to achieve annexation by the back door… lots of Little Israels in England‘s green and pleasant land? Bushey is already occupied territory, evidently. Whatever next?

The Eruv schemes rely on there being no grounds for refusal under Planning Law. But would the Jewish state grant Christian and Muslim communities such planning privileges and similar boundary marking in Tel Aviv or Israeli-annexed Jerusalem? I don’t think so.

Indeed, the Washington Post reports that in Nazareth Illit, a Jewish suburb of the mainly Arab town of Nazareth (now in Israel although not allocated for a Jewish state in the 1947 UN Partition), the mayor makes no concessions to non-Jews. “This is a Jewish city,” he says, “now and forever…. I would rather cut off my right arm than build an Arab school.” Ditto mosques. “No, no, no. No mosques, ever.” No churches, Ramadan lanterns or manger scenes. “And no Christmas trees… Everyone can live here, that is the law, as long as they understand this is a Jewish city… And in that way we are a microcosm of the state of Israel… 95 percent of Jewish mayors think the same thing. They‘re just afraid to say so out loud.”

Nazareth Illit is an Israeli new town, built with government support on expropriated Arab lands.

Last I heard, England is a Christian country still. Even David “I’m-a-Zionist” Cameron says so. Do we want microcosms of the state of Israel here?

It smacks of psychological warfare aimed at making non-Jewish communities feel vulnerable and unsafe. Presumably the aerial boundaries will be expanded as the ‘ingathering’ proceeds and uncomfortable non-Jewish residents are driven out. How long before those who complain about this creeping annexation of their neighbourhoods, however “symbolic”, are smeared with the anti-Semitic label?

When I was a boy living in Finchley, the bus route to the West End of London ran through Golders Green. Even in those far-off days it was a standing joke that you needed your passport for the trip. How much worse it must seem today now that Golders Green is pegged out with a demarcation boundary of 5.5 metre poles strung together with fishing line.

 

Amen..........................

 

Don't be fooled by the 'its just a concept about a homeland for the Jews' thing, my man.

It is CLEARLY NOT 'nationalist'.

It is internationalist.

Were it not internationalist, then it would not have done what Communism did (by other means), and that is 'go international'.

Zionism may be many things, but it is not nationalism in the sense that you or I may think of it.

On the contrary, it is evidently and beyond all doubts whatsoever, INTERNATIONALIST.

 

Wire cutters? I bet the hardware shops in the area are stocking up!

 

Thanks for the ideological response... America has to learn from the European failure. Has to make emigration to the U.S. a <PREFERENCE> similar to the years it was implemented. Priorities (10 year wait/preference to join a family member)... Only learned/demanded traders/workers need apply and slowly refuse entrance to the non productive elements, if they sneak in they will not be able to get a green card (this time an electronic one that cannot be duplicated) after five years to swear allegiance to the Flag to receive their SS card if they can prove they are working in a permanent job.
In Europe more than half of the riff raff admitted... just arrived with the intention to take advantage of the free Dole.
Europe is paying through the nose, with their raped youngsters, their burnt cars and domiciles, their NO ENTER zones etc., wake up Europe and smell the coffee.

 

When I first read this story, just last night, I simply could not read it and leave it there.

After all, we all fall into the trap of finding a story and putting it up, without being able(or willing), to directly address any of those that get named in the story.

Well, my move was the most sincere move you can do - I directly went to source. To John Dowdle, Chair of Watford Area Humanists.

You will remember he said this in the piece;


&#8220;An Eruv enforces a religious identity on all others living within the religious boundary, whether they share those beliefs or not. I have serious concerns about the detrimental impact this could have on social cohesion. In Israel, people driving cars on Shabbat (Saturday) are subjected to stone throwing by ultra-orthodox religionists. Are we opening the way for this kind of behaviour in Britain?&#8221;


His response when asked directly by me?


"Yes, it is fully accurate. These eruvim have only come into existence in Britain over the last 10 years. Before that, they did not exist. If you want to find out how hollow the beliefs underlying these eruvim are, I will be chairing a meeting in Watford on Thursday on "The Film The BBC Banned".


This is all sides of staggering. Not merely this, all of it.

Btw, I hope their Iron Dome works better than the OP's transparent attempt at racial agitation, given that he seems to have vanished from his own thread after I proved beyond all possible doubt, that the cause of his 'concern', that is to say those that made his 'concern' possible - were Jews.

Notice how the Jews are not so keen to apply the standards they force onto everyone else, in their own stupid state.

 

"The installation of eruvin has been a matter of contention in many neighbourhoods around the world, with notable examples such as the London Borough of Barnet; Outremont, Quebec; Tenafly, New Jersey, and Westhampton Beach, New York.

As the property-owner is the owner of the public streets, sidewalks and the utility poles on which symbolic boundaries are to be strung, some authorities have interpreted Jewish law as requiring the local government to participate in the process as one of the property owners by agreeing to creation of the eruv, and to give permission for the construction of a symbolic boundary on its property. In addition, because municipal law and the rules of utility companies, in general, prohibit third parties from stringing attachments to utility poles and wires, the creation of an eruv has often necessitated obtaining permissions, easements, and exceptions to various local ordinances. These requirements that government give active permission for an eruv have given rise to both political and legal controversy.

In the Elstree and Borehamwood neighbourhoods of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom, a petition was circulated in 2007 condemning the proposed eruv on the grounds that it would constitute the establishment of a "Jewish state"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv


My god.

Yes.

The OP is right.

This MUST go.

[video=youtube;6iDHIYZYd9g]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=6iDHIYZYd9g[/video]

 

By the way, for non-Muslims reading this, the bolded last sentence is an example of a Saul Alinsky tactic. Publicly criticizing a group for failing to live up to their own rules.

No group has the ability to always live by their own rules.

Here's a point from Alinsky via Glenn Beck.

http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

 

Clowns should be allowed to stake out their own communities in London and mark their territory with balloons and Clown Wardens.

 

And herein lies the real problem with International Jewry as it were. I'm sure none of us would have a problem with a Jewish National homeland, and in fact that's
what the 1948 mandate was for. The West sacrificed its principle for self-determination, in exchange for hopefully solving the INTL. Jewish problem. Was this not a kind gesture on the West's part?

I believe it was. And how have we been repaid? Today is no different than 1948! As your post so elaborates Jack, they would like to create their state inside European/Western territories! This, in spite of how much they brag about the "miracle"(brought about by U.S/European money of course). They've brought us into their wars, and the decency of Human Rights do not exist for the conquered(Palestinians).

To illustrate just how poorly they've operated, notice how no one refers to Israel as "the only democracy in the Middle East", as late as 2008/2009, that line was still used. But today? Not a Western politician acknowledges it as such, because even in spite of the black mail, you can't convince any man of decency that bulldozing houses, detaining children for hours and saying the only way to "begin talks" is to denounce even so much of a single stance(IE: "No Pre-conditions") is a democratic state of affairs.

It is of grave misfortune, that the Jewish Question has not been solved but this time, there's no Hitler or Holocaust to blame. The reason the Jewish Question is unsolved, is entirely the fault of the Elitist Jewish Community. In much the same way Radical Islam will never be an ally of the West. I never realized until now just how apt and accurate the comparison of Radical Islam and Judaism is.

 

We're bigoted, yes. Because its the West that tries to interject its societies into other nations? That we get them to fight our wars for us? Gee, don't I wish. Even those who complained that the U.S'/West tried to spread "democracy", compared to Radical Islam or Zionism or Multiculturalism, isn't "democracy" a much better alternative?

When we tore down the Berlin Wall, was that not in the interest of Europe? Compared to the true bigots of World History, Western interaction has been quite minor. But yes, we're bigoted for speaking out against the infractions against our governments and our people.

 

Very concerning, I hope governments in Europe will wake up and do two things:
1. Pressure Muslims countries especially in the Middle East to allow none Muslims to flourish and live freely to practice and expand.
2. If Muslim countries refuse to respect and stop restrictions against none Muslims, Western countries need to save a place for none Muslims to flourish in Europe reserve those what has become Muslim territories in Europe for none Muslim immigrants and restrict the immigration of Muslims into Europe.

Muslims want to draw a line then they should leave Europe.

 

As the highly erudite and humble Gilad says 'There is no such thing as anti semitism'.

Why?

Because for one thing, as he says, Jews do not have hegemony of being a semite people.

Doesn't matter if they have stolen the term, factually and actually, it is not accurate or right.

There are lots of semites I may like. And lots of Jews are not even semites. Indeed, one could fairly argue that the most viscous anti semites today are non semite Jews.

But this was a genius own goal by the OP.

Thought he would dupe people into focusing on DEM MUSLIMS.

Turns out the source of the problem he urges us to address are - Jews.

As I proved with the legislators etc, and as you can find out yourself in a few hours reading.

 

I would sooner Jews left ALL of Europe today.

How about that?

I mean, since I have shown they were the cause of this problem that concerns you.

 

AFAI can tell , so far , Jews are behind - and have caused far more harm over the centuries of them being in Europe than we've had from Muslims.

If it wasn't for Zionism , I doubt whether we'd today witnessed the current wave of Islamophobia .

As John Sheehan said "Every time anyone says that Israel is our only friend in the Middle East, I can't help but think that before Israel, we had no enemies in the Middle East"


--

 

Mcdonalds outlets all over the world, military bases all over the world and on and on. Of course europeans do that. You probably cant see because it is right in front of you.

- - - Updated - - -

1 million Afrikans thrown over board during the triangle trade was minor? 18 million enslaved in America was minor?

 

From anyone.

They have no peers in that respect.

 

If anyone want picture of paris real life. Ask me. I live by the area.

While the US report is of course biais in their sort, i can assure you that in several part of Paris and other big cities. We are not in France anymore.
I can conduct anyone to those area if you step by Paris. Just PM me.

 

Jews are not the problem, Muslims are.

- - - Updated - - -

Jews have advance and modernize the world, Islams wants to suppress the world.

 

Muslims are doing the bidding of Zionists in Europe.

Zionists promote multiculturalism in all countries, except in Israel.

Zionists are behind the movements that advocated mass immigration of non-Europeans to Europe.

Zionists and Muslims have common interests in Europe.

They have similar cultures, like mutilating the genitalia of their children and hating pork.

Zionists recently supported the Muslims in their campaign to legalise the mutilation of genitalia of children in Germany.

 

Schieze Kopf Frenchies bombed Libya and turned it over to Talmu-"Islamic" terrorists and are supporting the same sort of terrorists against Syria.
And before that, they helped turn Bosnia and Kosovo over to terrorists.
They are getting what they deserve?
Certainly they are getting a taste of what their glorious peoples' leaders have done to other nations.
View attachment 22647

 

You suggested that you had seen a government website that explains it. Bring it.

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jan/16/sensitive-urban-areas/#ixzz2fjzW1DIQ