# Political science by math , biology , ...

Discussion in 'Political Science' started by HuynhPhuDat, Jan 19, 2013.

1. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
Political science = mathematical politics , biological , ..politics .
At the final , we will see the citizens power index of all United Nation memebers .

1 _ Type of Government under view of Political science = mathematical politics .

People nowadays always split governments around the world into 2 type : capitalism , socialist . But I use math and I analyze governments like this :
I use I I : this is a symbol we know when go to school and learn about math , symbol of absolute value , math .

Ex : I  9 I = 9 , I 9 I = 9 .

We have 2 type of government : I Government I or absolute value government type and NON
I Government I or NON absolute value government  normal government .

Definition of I Government I or absolute value government type is a government that the existence of that government dont belong to the working effect of the government , even the working effect of the government is not good , that government still exist .

I -9 I = 9 or I Working Effect of a government = - 9 I = 9 , if the final result is positive value , and we call positive value has a meaning exist so we have

=> I Working Effect of a government = - 9 I = 9 = exist .

NON I Government I or NON absolute value government  normal government .

( Working Effect of a government = - 9 ) = - 9 = not exist

( Working Effect of a government = 9 ) = 9 = exist

Low value or high value of left side or right side are value of good / bad working , good / bad existence

NON I Government I or NON absolute value government  normal government is a government that the existence of that government belong the working effect of that government

We can see I Government I type appear on a country that only have 1 government , a country lead by 1 party .

NON I Government I or NON absolute value government  normal government appear on a country that have more than 2 parties so when the leading party make a good / bad working effect , citizen can change / not change leading party , and can change / not change leading party it meant the government of that party exist ? not exist .

2 _ How do we call Leading government , leading party , citizens in math ?

A country lead by a party , a government , where are they come from , they come from the citizens of that country , from citizens become a leaders of that country . The citizens have a number larger than the leaders , the leading party , leading government , so the leaders , the leading party , leading government belong to the citizens . We call leaders , the leading party , leading government are a SUBSET of CITIZENS SET because the leading party , leading government , leaders before they become a leaders , leading party leading government , theyre citizens .

Or a better way to give Definition : Leaders children SUBSET , Leading party children SUBSET , leading government children SUBSET . And Citizens Mother SET . Because there was Citizens Mother SET , Leaders children SUBSET was born , Leading party children SUBSET was born , leading government children SUBSET was born .

An authoritarian government should remember this : youre just a children SUBSET , and all things you do can analyze into a formula systems , all your documents you create can analyze by formula systems , each sentence , each word you say or you write into the document will become a quantity ( math ) and can analyze by math , analyze by your own language dictionary  words appear in dictionary always have their own value , it can be negative value , positive value , .. , after reading a sentence , it always give a specific meaning , and we can change that specific meaning into math value .

3 _ Power of citizens mother SET , power of Leaders children SUBSET , Leading party children SUBSET , leading government children SUBSET in math and biology .

If 1 country have 1 million citizens include the Leaders children SUBSET , Leading party children SUBSET , leading government children SUBSET have 1 thousand member and we choose each citizens give 1 power unit , each member of Leaders children SUBSET , Leading party children SUBSET , leading government children SUBSET give 1 unit power so we have

1 million citizens have power = 1 million power unit .
1 thousand members of Leaders SUBSET , Leading party SUBSET , leading government SUBSET basically have power = 1 thousand power unit .

Power of citizens mother SET choose their own Leaders SUBSET , Leading party SUBSET , leading government SUBSET , its meant citizens mother power which have 1 million power unit give power
to the Leaders children SUBSET , the Leading party children SUBSET , the leading government children SUBSET .

Law of a country reflect traits of the brains and biology of the citizens of that country , reflect traits of the brain and biology of Leaders children SUBSET , Leading party children SUBSET , leading government children SUBSET .

Ex : If a government of a country have a legislative system , a executive system , a judicial system , and the legislative system have a rule : this country only lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET so how we analyze this in math and biology ?

A president can lead a country , a CEO can lead a corporation , why they can do it , because they have leading index , leading value , and leading index can have value = 10 , 20 , 1110 , 1000000 ,  So notion of lead can be a thought or a index , and we will need formula and math to have that index .

A country only lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , what does it meant ?

It meant trait of biology and brain of the citizens mother SET of that country only can release 1 Leaders SUBSET , 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET and theyre best of this country .

1 men or1 women is a SET of index from knowledge , age , height , leading ability , IQ , EQ ........ index .

Ex : if we call A1 is a number , a value , a index of traits of the brains and biology and A2 is a Leading country ability index , A3 is Living environment index , A4 is virtuous character index , A5 is knowledge of Leaders SUBSET , 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , B1 is a number , a value , a index of traits of the brains and biology and B2 is a Leading country ability index , B3 is Living environment index , B4 is virtuous character index , B5 is knowledge of citizens mother SET ,
Because we will choose the best for our country , the best to lead our country so inside the brain people of legislative system , a executive system , a judicial system of a country lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET :

A1 > B1 , A2 > B2 , A3 > B3 , A4 > B4 , A5 > B5

Inside country lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , if 1 member of citizens mother SET have B2 , even how great B2 is , B2 is always < than A2 or always = 0 ( inside legislative system people brain ) or always valueless or always useless .

A country only lead by 2 , 3 , . Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , what does it meant ?

We use A1 , A2 , A3 , A4 , A5 , B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5

A1 can < or = or > or B1 , A2 can < or = or > or B2 , A3 can < or = or > or B3 , A4 can < or = or > or B4
A5 can < or = or > or B5

The most important thing here is B1 , B2 , B3 , B4, B5 are not define , not determine , not specify value , and of course if some members of citizens mother SET have a better B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 index and they think they can do better than the Leading party SUBSET , the leading government SUBSET , they can create a party and work until they can lead the country , show citizens mother SET they have better B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 and they can do better than the old party .

Do the citizens mother SET of choose their country only lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET . It hardly to say but it can determine like this

A legislative system SUBSET choose 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , here is

A legislative system SUBSET &#1028; Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET . ( &#1028; is math symbol , it meant belong )
And a executive system , a judicial system &#1028; Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET

So about creating leaders , leading party ability , traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can create 2 or 3 parties better than traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can only create 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET .

If we call creating leaders , leading party ability is a index , some countries will have this index = 2 , 3 , some countries will have this index is 1 . And distance of traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can create 2 or 3 parties better than traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can only create 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET is : 3 -1 = 2 , 2 -1 = 1 . The result show us that we can count the difference of traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET by just a index .

File size:
80 KB
Views:
0
File size:
204.3 KB
Views:
1
2. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
A country only lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , what does it meant ?

It meant trait of biology and brain of the citizens mother SET of that country only can release 1 Leaders SUBSET , 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET and theyre best of this country .

1 men or1 women is a SET of index from knowledge , age , height , leading ability , IQ , EQ ........ index .

Ex : if we call A1 is a number , a value , a index of traits of the brains and biology and A2 is a Leading country ability index , A3 is Living environment index , A4 is virtuous character index , A5 is knowledge of Leaders SUBSET , 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , B1 is a number , a value , a index of traits of the brains and biology and B2 is a Leading country ability index , B3 is Living environment index , B4 is virtuous character index , B5 is knowledge of citizens mother SET ,
Because we will choose the best for our country , the best to lead our country so inside the brain people of legislative system , a executive system , a judicial system of a country lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET :

A1 > B1 , A2 > B2 , A3 > B3 , A4 > B4 , A5 > B5

Inside country lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , if 1 member of citizens mother SET have B2 , even how great B2 is , B2 is always < than A2 or always = 0 ( inside legislative system people brain ) or always valueless or always useless .

A country only lead by 2 , 3 , . Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , what does it meant ?

We use A1 , A2 , A3 , A4 , A5 , B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5

A1 can < or = or > or B1 , A2 can < or = or > or B2 , A3 can < or = or > or B3 , A4 can < or = or > or B4
A5 can < or = or > or B5

The most important thing here is B1 , B2 , B3 , B4, B5 are not define , not determine , not specify value , and of course if some members of citizens mother SET have a better B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 index and they think they can do better than the Leading party SUBSET , the leading government SUBSET , they can create a party and work until they can lead the country , show citizens mother SET they have better B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 and they can do better than the old party .

Do the citizens mother SET of choose their country only lead by 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET . It hardly to say but it can determine like this

A legislative system SUBSET choose 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET , here is

A legislative system SUBSET &#1028; Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET . ( &#1028; is math symbol , it meant belong )
And a executive system , a judicial system &#1028; Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET

So about creating leaders , leading party ability , traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can create 2 or 3 parties better than traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can only create 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET .

If we call creating leaders , leading party ability is a index , some countries will have this index = 2 , 3 , some countries will have this index is 1 . And distance of traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can create 2 or 3 parties better than traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET of some countries can only create 1 Leading party SUBSET , 1 leading government SUBSET is : 3 -1 = 2 , 2 -1 = 1 . The result show us that we can count the difference of traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET by just a index .

The plentiful index of politics between some country will have a difference like creating leaders , leading party ability index . Perhaps because of traits of the brains and biology between countries , between citizens mother SETS , so some countries can create 1 leading party know there are only 1 way to lead a country , some countries can create 2 , 3 party know there are 2 , 3 way to lead a country , is that RIGHT ?
Which traits of the brains and biology of a countries , of a citizens mother SET is better ? You should find your answer by yourself .

We use A1 , A2 , A3 , A4, A5 , B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , A5 .
Using biological knowledge , it meant bring all things we know about biology into political science .

View attachment 17534

3. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
There are 2 kind of structure of all countries around the world :

Country = 1 leading party children SUBSET or 1 leading party SUBSET + citizens mother SET
= members have ( A1 , A2 , A3 , A4, A5 , .... ) + members have ( B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 , ...) which A1 > B1 , A2 > B2 , A3 > B3 , A4 > B4 , A5 > B5 ,.......

Country = 1 leading government SUBSET + party AA children SUBSET + party BB children SUBSET +  + citizens mother SET .
= members have ( A1 , A2 , A3, A4 , A5 , .....) + members have ( AA1 , AA2, AA3 , AA4 , AA5 ,....) + members have ( BB1 , BB2 , BB34 , BB4 , BB5 , ....) + members have ( B1 , B2 , B3 , B4 , B5 ,..... ) which A1 , AA1 , BB1 , B1, are same type index , A2 , AA2 , BB2 , B2 are same type index , A3 , AA3 , BB3 , B3 are same type index , A4 , AA4 , BB4 , B4 are same type index , A5 , AA5, BB5 , B5 are same type index and :

A1 < or = or > AA1 < or = or > BB1 < or = or > B1 ,
A2 < or = or > AA2 < or = or > BB2 < or = or > B2
A3 < or = or > AA3 < or = or > BB3 < or = or > B3
A4 < or = or > AA4 < or = or > BB4 < or = or > B4
A5 < or = or > AA5 < or = or > BB5 < or = or > B5
If we talk about traits of the brains and biology and some detail index , which type of country is better ?

If I have gene map of a country , I will bring it here .

4 _ Vote , power of citizens mother SET choice
Power of citizens mother SET have a value , from 0 to low value , form low value to high value , from high value to highest value .

Why , most of people think when they go and use their vote , they choose a people for a position in the government , they are using their power . But each position in a government have a different power value so belong to the position of a government they can choose , we know that do the citizens reach the maximum power of citizens mother SET when they use their vote .

Ex : a country have 1 million citizens , government have 1000 positions and 50 positions in the parliament house . A president lead a country , if 1 million citizens mother SET = 1 millions , each citizens member can give 1 citizen power unit so 1 million citizens mother SET can give 1 millions power unit .
If citizens mother SET can choose the people for a president positions , a highest position lead a country and can use maximum power unit : 1 millions power unit so :

Citizens mother SET power = 1 millions power unit can choose a government positions and this position contain 1 millions power unit

Traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET deservedly choose the person become their highest leader .

1 millions power unit choose = 1 millions power unit position

If citizens mother SET cant choose the people for a president positions , a highest position lead a country can use maximum power unit 1 millions power unit so :

Traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET dont deservedly to choose the person become their highest leader .
If we call Citizens mother SET power = 1 millions power unit , E is a position in government can use not a maximum power unit or E value , E index < 1 millions power unit so :

1 millions power unit choose # 1 millions power unit position or 1 millions power unit choose < 1 millions power unit position

We have Traits of the brains and biology of citizens mother SET dont deservedly to choose the person become their highest leader .

Each position in a government has a unit power index .

If we say citizens is a boss of a country , the leading party or leading government is a CEO , so boss can fire CEO or :

In some countries :

( ( ( the power of citizens < the power of the leaders , the leading party , the leading government ) × 365 days ) × 4 ) + 1 day citizens choose their leading party , their highest leader  powers of citizens mother SET = 1000000 power unit > power of highest leader = 0 . power of leading party = 0
Or : 1000000  0 = 1000000 , if minus meant fire , so 1000000 power unit of citizens mother SET fire leading party , fire the highest leader .
Citizens mother SET choose highest leader = 1000000 unit power = 1000000 power unit position , if we say the first equal meant choose , we already see citizens choose .

In some countries we dont see citizens mother SET can choose the highest power position of their country , trait of brain and biology of citizens mother SET only can choose some position which have low index power positions of the government , the leading party children SUBSET choose the highest position to lead the country of citizens mother SET because trait of brain and biology of citizens mother SET not deservedly to choose the highest position of their countries , and the existence of the leading party children SUBSET dont belong to citizens mother SET ( Why only leading party children SUBSET choose ,they have higher index than the citizens mother SET )
I call this government system is :  Our self give our self power system government  because we know that the ID party leading member card belong to most of member of legislators of this countries type .

- - - Updated - - -

5 _ Family children SUBSET inside leading children party SUBSET , government children SUBSET .

Ex : 1 country have 1 millions citizens , so it each citizens member can give 1 citizen power unit so 1 million citizens mother SET can give 1 millions power unit .

If each family children SUBSET have 4 members so this country have 250 thousands family children SUBSETS .

If 1 family children SUBSET have 1 member become the highest leader of this country or the power of this member = 1 million power unit government position . We call this family children SUBSET is FSU.
FSU= 4 members , 1 member = 1 millions power unit government position so if 1 another
Member of this FSU join the government and have a position = 1 power unit position so the power of this FSU power = 1 millions + 1 = 1 000 001 > 1 million citizens mother SET have 1 millions power unit .

If each 1 family have 1 positions in a government supply 1 point of diversified index so :

1000 positions = 1000 members of 1000 family children SUBSET = 1000 diversified index
1 family have 2 positions in the government :
1000 positions = 1000 members of ( ( 1000 &#8211; 2 members of 1 family ) + 1 ) = 999 family children SUBSET = 999 diversified , multiform index of this government .

1000 diversified index of government > 999 diversified index of government .
1000 diversified index of government , it meant there are 1000 members of 1000 family of this country deservedly join the government .
999 diversified index of government it meant there are 1000 members of 999 family of this country deservedly join the government .
Diversified index reflect how many family children SUBSET can join the government , it can reach the maximum value or minimum value . It reflect the total family SUBSET can joint the government . Maximum diversified index of 1 government meant maximum family which have member deservedly to joint the government , minimum diversified index meant few families can have members deservedly to join the government or trait of brain and biology of most of families in this country are weak , small , bad , only some families can supply their members for the government .

We can see this with Cuba country . If Cuba have 1 000000 citizens , government of Cuba have 1000 positions , the highest positions leaders of Cuba = 1 000000 power unit position , the second positions leader of Cuba = 999999 power unit position and Fidel Castro are the highest leader of Cuba with the position = 1000000 power unit position , Raul Castro are the second positions leader of Cuba = 999999 power unit position , and if there are 1 member of Castro FSU join the government of Cuba with position = 1 power unit position so :

( 1000000 + 999999 + 1 = 2000000 ) power unit Castro FSU > 2 × ( citizens mother SET = 1000000 citizens = 1000000 power unit ) .
The power of Castro FSU > power of Cuba citizens mother SET .
And this diversified index can use to talk about a government have many companies , groups control national properties , we also see many members of government have son , daughter control or work in their companies , groups , we can see a lot of family trees in that type government .

If 1 country have 1000000 citizens = 2 cities and each city = 500 000 citizens , each city have 1 member of parliament , 1 highest leader of the city and a country have a highest leader of the country so :
Power of citizens = 500000 × 2 = 1000000 power unit when they choose member of the parliament .
Power of citizens = 500000 × 2 = 1000000 power unit when they choose leaders of their cities .
Power of citizens = 1000000 power unit when they choose the highest leaders of the country

So the total power of the citizens mother SET = 1 000000 + 1 000000 + 1 000000 =
3 000000 power unit .
If we call the day people can choose highest leader , members of parliament , leaders of the cities are useful day of citizens mother SET power , so we have useful index of power of citizens mother Set = 1 × 3 = 3 .

4. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0

Most of country when they create a government machine diagram , they don&#8217;t bring the citizens mother SET , but the difference between government is here .

1: control citizens life in 365 × 4 .
If some people say government is a machine so he has to perform it like a real machine .
Choosing leaders almost look like On / Off button , many country they design government without On / Off button , that is I government I
All government positions have power unit index for each of them .
If we use this type diagram and use law with math , we can understand president Egypt problem !!!

×, / , + , - , < , > , &#8230;. All things belong to math can appear hear if I have more time

This is a basic electric circuit of Government machine with the appear of citizens mother SET .
Law usually use sentences so what will happen if 1 people use math and electric system to analyze and bring them all into a system ?
Is every word we use every day contain a value ? How to analyze every thing people say in math and realize that is good or bad people ? We can use our dictionary .
If we say + , - are electricity for this machine so tax are + , - for this machine but I don' t bring it here .
If someone want to say power of this country belong to citizens , it meant there will be a line with switch , contact to connect . Members of parliament choose will different with citizens choose because there is a contact , switch , breaker and we will know where is the power belong to . Members of parliament belong to the 1 leading party children SUBSET will have a mark in the diagram .

If 1 country have 1 000000 citizens include government + members of parliament + leading party = 1000 members . = meant choose , # meant can not choose so 1000000 - 1000 = 999 000 citizens .
Each citizens and government + members of parliament + leading party = 1000 members when they choose highest leaders supply 1 power unit so :

If highest leader = government + members of parliament + leading party = 1000 members + 999 000 citizens = SUBSET + SET = 1000 + 999 000 = 1000000 power unit = 1000000 power unit position .

If highest leader = government + members of parliament + leading party = 1000 members = SUBSET = 1000 power unit ×1000 = 1000000 power unit position &#8211; each member of government + members of parliament + leading party have 1000 power unit .

Trait of brain and biology of 999 000 citizens mother SET do not deservedly choose 1000000 power unit position of the government , only 1000 SUBSET which 1000 power unit can choose 1000000 power unit position .

Trait of brain of 999 000 citizens mother SET do not deservedly choose 1000000 power unit position .

999 000 citizens mother SET = 999 000 power unit # 1000000 power unit position = 1000000 power unit .
Trait of brain of 1000 (government + members of parliament + leading party ) deservedly choose 1000000 power unit position .

1000000 &#8211; 1000000 = 0 ( after government + members of parliament + leading party choose , 0 is a result citizens mother SET can choose )
999000 citizens mother SET = 999000 power unit choose 0 power unit position
999000 citizens mother SET = 999000 × 0 = 0
Or each member of citizens mother SET have power index = 0 when only ( government + members of parliament + leading party ) SUBSET choose highest leader .

When Kim Young Il only can choose highest leader for North Korean , his power index = all power unit of all member of North Korean = highest leader position .
Power of Kim Young Il 1000000 power unit = 1000000 power unit position for Kim Young Un so where is the power of citizens mother SET ?

5. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
This is the power index of citizens mother SET all United Nation members , each citizens supply 1 power unit :

If you ask Barack Obama , Aristotle , Karl Marx , AP , AFP , Reuters ..... about power index of citizens , they can not answer this question because no one can teach them about this .

6. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
Using biological knowledge for analyzing political news .
6 _ North Korea .

I watch TV , read newspaper and see many North Korean people hungry , and than die because of hunger .
If North Korea have 1000000 citizens , 1 citizens die because of hunger so :
1000000 citizens = 1000000 power unit , if 1 citizens die because of hunger : 1000000 -1 = 999999 power unit . The power of citizens mother SET decrease 1 power unit .
I see many North Korean people eat food come from another country , they can die if they dont have food of the others country , the value of citizens mother SET power belong to the food of the others country .
If in North Korea , the animal can earn enough food , never die of hunger but some North Korean die of hunger , so North Korea animal earn food better than North Korean . How many kind of animal , insect kind , plant , fish , . earn food , nutriment better than North Korean ?
If when army of North Korean match on the square , if a reporter from a country ask the highest leader of North Korean a permission for a photograph that inside the photograph , the North Korean army and the citizens mother SET and KWP children SUBSET , open their mouth which the food they earn inside or the food from the others country - country of the reporter  and strip their pants or their skirt , let their (*)(*)(*)(*) out of their as**oles , and inside the photograph is a note : food inside the moth of North Korean army and North Korean citizens mother SET , RPK children SUBSET some belong to North Korean , some belong to the country of the reporter , and the sh*t of North Korean , some belong to North Korean , some belong to the country of the reporter . The reporter can give this photograph to his government and put it in the history textbook of his country and North Korea history textbook . Of course , they can put North Korea animal , fish , plant near them for comparison .

GDP of North Korean = 1800 USD .
All the animal have to earn their food . I dont know how much meat 1 tiger have to eat for 1 day , but if 1 tiger have to eat A weight unit of meat , and A weight unit of meat can buy with 10 USD , so with 365 day = 10 × 365 = 3650 USD , in my opinion a whale can earn 20 or 30 USD food per day , 20 × 365 = 7300 USD .
I simple call the food , the value of food a tiger have to find every day to eat is tiger GDP , and a whale has his GDP too .
A distance between a tiger and a North Korean is : 3650  1800 = 1850 USD .

Of course , there are many mathematical formula to prove human kind better than animal many times , but if you want it , you should use your brain .

Some countries in this world , after a leading process by only 1 leading party , 1 government , , after 30 , 40 years they lead , their country GDP can not compete with GDP of just a animal GDP . If citizens mother SET of that country can choose 2 or 3 parties to lead his country , things they earn reflect trait of their brain and biology , if citizens mother SET of that country only can choose 1 leading party , 1 leading government , things they earn only reflect trait of brain and biology of leading party , leading government .

Wolf is a kind of animal . Wolfs have leader of the flock . Do you know how many year 1 wolf become a leader of the flock? I dont know but if wolf can live 12 years , so 1 wolf can become a leader in 4 , 6 years .
If 1 wolfs flock need 6 years to create another leader of their flock , North Korean need 17 years but still can not create another leader until Kim Jong Il die , about creating leader abilities , the distance between a wolf and a North Korean leader : 6  17 = -11
Kim Jong Il is a leader lead the citizens mother SET has a GDP can not compete with just a tiger GDP .
Kim Il sung , Kim Jong Il , Kim Jong Un are come from Kim family SUBSET , only Kim family SUBSET in North Korean can create a highest leader for North Korean  a leader that make his country become a redundant food eating country of others countries . If a flock of wolf have 18 member , each family of wolf flock have 3 members , it cost 6 years for creating a highest leader for this flock , after 1 highest leader of this flock replace by another highest leader of this flock , if 2 leaders of this flock come from 2 family , it meant 2 family of this wolf flock have creating highest leader abilities . Distance of creating highest leader abilities between families flock of wolf and North Korean families : 2 wolf families  1 North Korean Kim family = 1 .
Remember this , a good leader of a country will make his country reach good value , good index , at least can compete with animal kind we see in the zoo about GDP .
Ability , the citizens mother SET dont have that ability , and in some country , 1 people come from citizens mother SET or from another party , not belong to leading party , not belong to government can lead a whole country , so which trait of brain and biology between their country , their citizens mother SET , which one better ? . Remember this : Index only !!!

In North Korea , they change their name , and their name contain  Kim  , they like  redundant food eating leader  , they like a leader make GDP of North Korean can not compete with just a animal in many year Kim family SUBSET lead North Korea .

If North Korean like  Kim  , you better think about Sp*rm and Ovum of Kim family SUBSET . North Korean know that Kim Jong Il have son and daughter . Kim Jong Un become highest leader . To let all North Korean have real thing inside their bodies belong to  Kim family  , the only one family can lead North Korea become redundant food eating country , Kim Jong Un should c*m his sp*rm into all North Korean woman p*ssies , and all man of North Korean should use ov*m of Kim Jong Il daughter , that is a good way to bring trait of brain and biology of leading Kim family SUBSET into North Korean citizens mother SUBSET , not just a name .
If leading Kim family dont allow North Korean use them and North Korean want dont have to be die of hunger anymore , North Korean can think about sp*rm and ov*m of animal because at least they dont die of hunger .
When Kim Jong Un leader spent money on corpses of Kim Jong Il or Kim Il Sung and many North Korean die of hunger , you should think about how many power unit of citizens mother SET decrease when North Korean die , and North Korean leaders , RPK are just leading children SUBSET , North Korean citizens are mother SET .
If we call a cave of wolf flock are wolf properties , and that property have price is 1 .
Talking about a distance between a wolf and a North Korean , we can talk about property problem . If the property of each North Korean increase every year , the distance between property of a wolf and a North Korean increase , if the property of each North Korean not change or become poorer every year , the property distance between a wolf and a North Korean not change or North Korean are close to a wolf  a animal .

In India , if Indian want to teach Indian about population problem , you can do like this :
If 1 family have 9 children and 1 father 1 mother , the money that that family earn split into 11 pieces to buy food for 11 people , and the property of that family have to split into 9 pieces , share to 9 children when their parents die . With each son / daughter they decrease , the property distance between their child properties and the animal property increase , with each
son / daughter they release more , the property distance between their child properties and the animal property decrease .

And in a country that citizens mother SET which have B1, B2 ,B3 , B4 , B5 index can not choose the highest position leader because B1, B2 , B3 , B4 , . < A1 , A2, A3, A4 , A5,
Only leading party SUBSET , leading government SUBSET can choose highest leader position , if citizens mother SET want to improve all of their index , they should think about sperm and ovum of the 1 leading party , of 1 government .

7. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
North Korean leaders like Songun policy or military first , they also like redundant food eating policy or redundant food eating glory , citizens mother SET die of hunger policy / glory , power of citizens mother SET belong to food from another countries policy / glory , ... North Korean leader like Songun policy , it meant Songun become the most important thing in North Korea , it also meant guns , missile , nuclear weapon become most important thing , highest value things in North Korea so :

Songun policy = Guns , missile , nuclear weapon = highest value things > redundant food eating policy / glory / and citizens mother SET die of hunger policy / glory and power of citizens mother SET belong to redundant food from another countries policy / glory and GDP of North Korean can not compete with GDP of an animal policy / glory and properties of North Korean have a close range to properties of animal , ....

North Korea government is a I government I

- - - Updated - - -

8 _ Patriotism and Tax .

I think pay tax is a way we love our country , so tax you pay = patriotic unit , tax = patriotic percent .
If 1 man earn 100 USD and he pay tax 30 USD so 30 USD = 30 patriotic unit = 30 patriotic percent of 100 USD .

If we say 1 man pay tax so he love his country :
Patriotic man = monthly tax pay + uncountable patriotic action .
Patriotic man = patriotic percent = patriotic unit + uncountable patriotic action .
Patriotic company , patriotic group = monthly tax pay = uncountable patriotic percent + uncountable patriotic action .
Patriotic company , patriotic group = patriotic percent = patriotic unit + uncountable patriotic action .
If 1 company have office in 2 countries , this company create 2 type patriotic / percent unit of 2 countries .
Right now , in many countries , many companies refuse to pay tax by hundreds ways or pay tax with very low percent . So how can we solve this problem ?
We can not solve it instantly but there is way to solve this problem and teach people about patriotism .
Second , every countries have a national flag , patriotic man = patriotic percent = patriotic unit + uncountable patriotic action , Patriotic company , patriotic group = patriotic percent = patriotic unit + uncountable patriotic action , if each of citizens mother SET have to pay high tax = high patriotic percent = high patriotic unit and many companies , many group pay low tax or refuse to pay tax so : companies , groups pay low tax / 0 tax = low / 0 patriotic percent = low / 0 patriotic unit + uncountable patriotic action . If our law have a rule to force all companies , groups have to print the national flag into packing and patriotic percent under the flag of their packing , the client , customer will understand how patriotic these companies , group are . The national flag into packing and patriotic percent under can appear near the name of the product , on product date / expired date , on the advertising on TV or newspaper , .. That is away to advertise your product if you pay high patriotic percent to your government .
With the same type product , different companies / groups will pay different patriotic percent if they pay low / 0 patriotic percent and a patriotic client will choose a patriotic product that the producer pay higher patriotic percent . I think its time to let everybody know will the producer of the product people buy pay good tax , pay good patriotic percent to the country they sell product .

And a tax department of a government can supply patriotic information about 1 kind product , which company pay high patriotic percent ?

In USA , communication system split citizens mother SET into 2 pieces : 99% and 1 % .
99% earn not to much money but pay high patriotic percent , 1% earn a lot of money but pay low patriotic percent .

We both know that law system of a country create by members of parliament , and about patriotic percent law , many members of parliament agree to improve tax , some are not , so what formula inside their brains ?

Here I choose + is positive value , agreement , ayes .
- negative value , disagreement , noes
0 is undecided , wavering , blank vote .

Inside our brain we have a will , will can large or small but here I choose value 2 :

Tax law = ( will of 99% high patriotic percent + will of 1 % low patriotic percent  need to improve patriotic percent ) = + = agreement = ayes . Members of parliament agree with the tax law , ayes .

Tax law = ( will of 99% high patriotic percent = 2 + will of 1% low patriotic percent = - 2 ) = 0 = 0 = undecided = wavering = blank vote .

Tax law = ( will of 99% high patriotic percent = 2 + will of 1% low patriotic percent = - (2 + 1 ) ) = -1 = = disagree = noes .

1% have value bigger than 99% 1 , or will about 99% can not compete with will about 1% inside parliament members brains , bigger 1 value , 1 index that why they noes .

All around the world , the law of many countries have definitions about  who is a rich man , rich family  and if in USA , USA parliament can not define what is a rich man , a rich family , I will help you a little .

If we call the income of 1 family in USA = I = 50000 USD / year .
The USA parliament split the income in many standard : 100 000 , 150 000 , 200 000 , 250 000 , 300 000 ,
So 100 000 = 2 × I , 150 000 = 3 × I
In the tax law of all members of the United Nation , they have a definition about rich people and all of them are base on I of their countries , ignore the difference about currencies problem and use I for formula :
Country A : Rich family = 3 × I ,
Country B : Rich family = 9 × I ,
Country C : Rich family = 10 × I ,
Country D : Rich family = 6 × I ,

If we call M is a multiply number with I and we can bring the definition about  Rich family  of all United Nations members , when national debt of USA = 100% GDP , which M will they choose ? .
IF USA members of parliament choose M too large , it meant gap between the rich and the poor even inside the law are too large so do they want to decrease the gap between the rich and the poor even only in the law ? If USA members of parliament choose M is small , it meant gap between the rich and the poor even inside the law is small .
M can be a gap of between the rich and the poor index of the law .
Ha

8. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
9 _ Islam and scale of balance , distance to moral standard ( Include biological words )

Word = character 1 + character 1 + character 1 + character 1 + ..
Rule = word A + word B + word C + word D + word E + word F +
Law = multi rule = rule A + rule A + rule B + rule C + rule D + rule E + rule F+ rule E + .

The animal and human kind create by God . Law is a thing we use to control our society .
Rule in the Islam law affect the animal , animal kind = male animal + female animal .
If the rule about animal or rule talk about animal = 5 worlds in Islam rule , no distinguish
between male and female animal so we have a rate like this :

If Islam rule about animal = 2 words = world A + word B and the value of male animal = 1 , female animal = 1 so

( Word A + word B ) × 1 ( Male animal ) = ( Word A + word B ) × 1 ( female animal ) = balance
( Word A + word B ) : 1 ( Male animal ) = ( Word A + word B ) : 1 ( female animal ) = balance
( Word A + word B ) - 1 ( Male animal ) = ( Word A + word B ) - 1 ( female animal ) = balance
( Word A + word B ) + 1 ( Male animal ) = ( Word A + word B ) + 1 ( female animal ) = balance .
Of course we can bring more than that if we want but for me thats enough .

Or :

Or if we talk about every part of the body of the animal , if every part of the body of the female animal and male animal have a same value 1 :

( Word A + word B ) × 1 ( Male leg ) = ( Word A + word B ) × 1 ( female leg = balance
( Word A + word B ) : 1 ( Male eyes ) = ( Word A + word B ) : 1 ( female eyes ) = balance
.

Or :  From the a**hole to inside the brain  balance between the male animal female animal .

Female Circumcision is a problem in Islam society . Is that a balance ?
If inside the Islam rule , there is no rule about Male Circumcision but there is a Female Circumcision or no rule about p*nis of Islam man but there is rule about p*ssy of Islam woman so :
If we describe the operation of Female Circumcision into the paper , it cost 1 sentence = 3 words for Female Circumcision so the moral standard of Islam woman p*ssy = 3 words + p*ssy .
Call A is a moral value of Islam sex organ .
Because there is no rule about the penis of Islam man so :
Islam p*nis moral standard value = A
Islam p*ssy moral standard value = A = p*ssy + 3 words = p*ssy + 3 scars ( If Female Circumcision create 3 scars for Islam woman p*ssy ) .

In the scale of balance we already see the non balance
In the road to sex organ moral standard A , we already see the Islam p*ssy have to go a distance to reach the A standard .So do any body call this is balance ?
At the road to A value , we already see the position of between p*nis and p*ssy of Islam people , which one is higher ?

The marriage law of Islam allow 1 men marriage 4 woman and I think that is really interesting so :
B is marriage standard of Islam family :

At the road to B value , we already see the position of the men and women , which one higher ?
It need 4 woman to reach marriage Islam standard B when just 1 men = B .
I recommend that when Islam people pray the God , you should move into the scale of the balance with the rate left = 1 men , right = 4 woman because that is your balance , and God will really happy when God see that balance .
Do you know which kind of life form that God create with a rate : 1 male life form / 4 female life form ?

If the Islam rule , man have to obey 2 rules , woman have to obey 5 rules so :
If C is the moral standard of Islam between man and woman :

Many people around the world say that there is no balance between Islam man and Islam woman , if Islam law = 1 million rules for man and woman and Islam people want to show people how balance between man and woman is , just simple create a scale of balance and some diagrams about man and woman under every rule you add to the Islam law , this is the way Islam people completely shut the mouth of all non-Islam people off , and they will stop talking about balance between man and woman in Islam law .
Remember this : Law of Islam = 1000000 rules = balance between man and woman when = 1000000 scale of balance of man and woman = 1000000 diagram of man and woman .
Scale of balance is a cheap symbol of justice , of law if we not use it in our law !!!!
God create life and I do not know any life form have a rate 1 male life form / 4 female life form , this Islam rate is really interesting !!!

I know 1 story about Islam court : At 1 Islam country , 1 boss raped a maid , and the maid fight the boss , when she fight , she indeliberate kill him . And the Islam court convict the maid , she had to die .
Is that balance ?

If we say 1 people have 100 % = 50 % of body + 50 % honor and 50 % of body + 50 % honor of men = 50 % of body + 50 % honor of women . When the boss raped the maid and if you think raped woman will decrease 10% body and 50% honor of the maid , rape is guilty so when the maid killed the boss , she destroy 50 % of body + 50 % honor of the men . Kill people is guilty too but in this situation the boss raped the girl is extenuating circumstances or :
Kill people is guilty = - ( 50 % of body + 50 % honor )
the boss raped the girl = + (10% body and 50% honor )
Here we have a result : + (10% body and 50% honor ) + (- ( 50 % of body + 50 % honor ) )=
- 40% body . If we want to judge the maid , we at least have to base on this result , but the Islam court allowed to kill the maid ( If I were not wrong ) .

Kill the maid = - ( 50 % of body + 50 % honor ) of the maid for  40% body  her sin .

Do Islam people like killing people by carrying explosive inside the clothes ?
I dont know but let me help Islam people a little .
If Islam country = 1000000 citizens , and die for what you believe is the best so
1000000 citizens die is the best > 1000000 citizens live .
- (1000000 citizens ) > + (1000000 citizens ) if  is die , + is live .
You should choose the best thing if this is your best thing .

1 man suicide with explosive and kill 49 people .
Or -1 men = - 49 man & woman & kid

-1 = - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1

Or  ( 50% body + 50% honor ) =  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )  ( 50% body + 50% honor )

Before let 1 guy kill people with explosive , people want that guy to do it should remember this type balance .Is this a good thing , a balance ? Im right or wrong ?

9. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0

1000000 citizens die is the best > 1000000 citizens live or 1000000 citizens live is the best > 1000000 citizens die ? What do you think Taliban , Al queda ,

Human kind and all kind of life form in this universe have some way to build their society or like the way I call :
Use the brain to get what they want or a body part use for thinking .
Use working to get what they want .
Use corpse to get what they want ( this thing can harm people or not harm anyone , this is use for compare between a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) and a hero , it will use math to talk about it very clearly )
And final is mix of all 3 above .
The many thousands year history of human history can summarize in 4 sentences and Islam prophet teach Islam people using corpse to protect your religion . That is really interesting and Islam people should continue to do it .
If someone die for you , for all of you to live , the right side will be +

Here , the beauty of the animal reach the maximum value when they dont have clothes or when we see 100% skin area of them . Most of human kind reach their maximum beauty when they have sex .
Talking about the beauty of woman = total skin area that we can see , I think the beauty of the woman = 3 or 4 % if we compare with the animal .
Talking about the clothes balance between man and woman using total skin area that we can see , compare with animal first and then is

To be Continue

10. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
10 &#8211; Vegetarianism and guilty problem .

If value of men = 1 and value of the animal he eat = 2 , if &#8211; meant guilty , meant go to hell so : 1 men eat 1 animal = 1 -2 = -1 or the value of the animal > the value of the men .

Between the animal A will eat animal B and men will eat animal B , if animal A eat animal B but not guilty and when men eat animal B , it is guilty so if &#8211; meant guilty problem , we can compare a value of men and animal kind , which one larger .
If zen is the a valuable things = motionless body + empty brain + magic power ability so:
Moving / working body = useful body + useful brain + magic power > motionless body + empty brain + magic power ability .
Useful body = the way animal kind use their body every day .

If someone say he can use physics , chemistry or psychiatry for analyzing politics , I think it&#8217;s ok too , because when I create the government diagram that content switch , contact , breaker , that things we know when we learn physics . Here I&#8217;m not use physics , chemistry for analyzing political science because it will make this topic become too long , but if you like to see physics , chemistry appear on political science , you can do it , it just another way to use our knowledge about physics , chemistry .

Right now we already see power index of citizens mother SET of all countries around the world &#8211; I can give you power index of each position in the government machine if I have more time and information , but there are still freedom index and human rights index . I live in Vietnam so there is no way that I can analyze the freedom index and human rights index of all countries around the world .

Right now , I have 3 main project :

Project about freedom index of all countries around the world . When this index appear , many government only can talk about if my formula correct or not .

Project about human rights index of all countries around the world . When this index appear , many government only can talk about if my formula correct or not too

Project about translate law system into math language - this is a new way for analyzing law because law in my opinion look like math and formula , perhaps after this process a criminal can have criminal index too because criminal index can has 0 , low , high value or very high value . Scale of balance , you know , this is our justice symbol of law , I hope I can use it for comparing our law system and some decision or sentences of our court too ( no one in this world can compare all of that things , only a super computer can do that ) .

I hope I can find a professor work in political science or a university interesting with my 3 projects , fund me and give me a chance so I can continue work with my projects . If you like my article , I hope you can do something to help me , if no one help me , human kind will continue to think freedom , human rights are notions even I think they&#8217;re index , and they will continue to argue about freedom and human rights .

If I can analyze freedom index and human rights index , they can give Nobel prize to me and all people work with me . If no one help me , I have to stop my projects .
And if I have time , I can bring physics and chemistry into political science .

11. ### HuynhPhuDatNew Member

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14
0
Trophy Points:
0
If someone say he can use physics , chemistry or psychiatry for analyzing politics , I think it&#8217;s ok too , because when I create the government diagram that content switch , contact , breaker , that things we know when we learn physics . Here I&#8217;m not use physics , chemistry for analyzing political science because it will make this topic become too long , but if you like to see physics , chemistry appear on political science , you can do it , it just another way to use our knowledge about physics , chemistry .

Right now we already see power index of citizens mother SET of all countries around the world &#8211; I can give you power index of each position in the government machine if I have more time and information , but there are still freedom index and human rights index . I live in Vietnam so there is no way that I can analyze the freedom index and human rights index of all countries around the world .

Right now , I have 3 main project :

Project about freedom index of all countries around the world . When this index appear , many government only can talk about if my formula correct or not .

Project about human rights index of all countries around the world . When this index appear , many government only can talk about if my formula correct or not too

Project about translate law system into math language - this is a new way for analyzing law because law in my opinion look like math and formula , perhaps after this process a criminal can have criminal index too because criminal index can has 0 , low , high value or very high value . Scale of balance , you know , this is our justice symbol of law , I hope I can use it for comparing our law system and some decision or sentences of our court too ( no one in this world can compare all of that things , only a super computer can do that ) .

I hope I can find a professor work in political science or a university interesting with my 3 projects , fund me and give me a chance ( a research scholarship is OK ) so I can continue work with my projects . If you like my article , I hope you can do something to help me , if no one help me , human kind will continue to think freedom , human rights are notions even I think they&#8217;re index , and they will continue to argue about freedom and human rights .
If I can analyze freedom index and human rights index , they can give Nobel prize to me and all people work with me . If no one help me , I have to stop my projects .
And if I have time , I can bring physics and chemistry into political science .

Joined:
Jan 13, 2013
Messages:
14