Predictions for Post Election

This is such a load of bunk.If Romney wins there will be an almsot Instant
reaction in the Private sector.Wall Street will also surge.
With Romney there will no longer be as Policy a RESTRICTING of Oil not what Obama
likes to Lie about { That's he's regulating Oil ].Under Romney Oil will be a thriving venture
and americans will see the results at the pump.
Small Business will also bust out and hire and invest and create jobs and positions.
No more fear of harmfull,very scary sneaky use of Executive orders.
Of course Obama may insist he was robbed and the Election was stolen and he'll
mount court challenges like Gore did in Florida.
Florida is already gearing up for the same counties { Miami-dade,Broward } to be'
contested by liberal lawyers and judges.

 

If I'm not mistaken I believe Reid already made a statement clarifying how he'll
personally Block Any Romney agenda.

 

Tell that to Brandon Raub.

 

Regardless of who wins the election, the EPA will promulgate mad-dog regulations on coal-fired power plants in December of this year - prior to the inauguration.

 

I do not think Romney is a bad guy, if he wasn't running again Obama, I might even vote for him

both Romney and Obama are so far middle, both were good picks, I just think Obama has done a good job over the last four years and plan to vote him in for four more

one bad thing I see from Romney losing... the religious right will use this to push their party further right saying moderates can't win


.

 

Yeah- I think Romney is likely just as moderate as the Conservatives fear- but I still think he will appoint Justices that I would disagree with.

I don't foresee any big change if Romney is elected, but I do think we will have more troops overseas and more military spending under Romney than Obama- both candidates have made those positions pretty clear.

Regardless- the day after the winner is announced- I will be wishing the winner a very successful Presidency, and will hold off judgement on the President until I find policies or specific actions to disagree with.

 

I think we can all agree on at least that one thing - regardless who wins, Zosiasmom will still be one hell of a wet blanket.

 

Not sure about 6=8months, but anyway, no matter who wins....


The very rich will get richer, and be even more untouchable, legally.

The middle class will get a lot poorer, in large numbers.

Your already poor will become third world poor, and die in large numbers.

There will be greater levels of anti social crime, shootings, violence, and soclal meltdown.

There will be even more lies and propaganda on the news media, that will hide much of what is really going on.

There will be new laws brought in that will essentially lead to the arrest and detainment of political dissidents, journalists, writers, and others, who will be declared enemies of the state, on questionable grounds, with secret evidence used.

The constitution will remain almost in name only, there may even be a robust proposal to 'rebrand' it.

More jobs losses, but the figures will now be something like the Ministry of Truth, when given out.

More work outsourced to sweat shops, in China.

More wars, for Israel, Iran for sure.

More money to Israel, with larger dole cheques written, than ever before.

More tax and less spending on America, to pay for the above.

More children born into a life of debt,by all those traitors that supported plutocratic, Zionist, dual nationality, scum.

More abuse of power, domestically, with people being interned for the most tenious of reasons, but on the media, they will write a narrative to make it sounds like the person was a 'threat'.

Less internet freedoms.

More spying on you, and less privacy than in living memory.

More remote prisons, privately owned, and more prisoners in solitary than ever (US already puts more in solitary, sometimes for years and years, than any other country).

Probably false flag in the US, maybe cyber based, to get you into a war with (enter whoever Israel want).

Less corporate accountability.

Fewer rights for workers.

More US vets placed on terror watch lists.

 

Well...had Ron Paul gotten the nod and won this November you would see an ethereal being of love and light. Bluebirds would nest on my fingers and deer would eat bits of apple from my hand as I sang a happy song.

 

He was never designed to.

The Zionist plutocratic war mafia would never have funded him.

At best...he was there to make you think 'My, here is a fella, and he is so refreshing'.

Good for the illusion.

 

Okay, what else..

I think they will run the dollar into the ground, by they, I mean your real bosses, the financial mafia, they may even carry out a cyber false flag, crash all of your systems, thus dissapearing your money, causing practical havoc too, then blaming someone else. They have the means, they have the motive, they are psychopathic enough.

When a guy like George 'Black Wednesday' Soros remarks that the dollar is finished, and that the elite are really looking ahead to China, it may be not conclusive of anything, but it is telling of something.

Naturally, if they can manipulate it so that these problems appear not to be of their doing, they can then,like false heroes, ride along and offer you the NEW DEAL, that will 'save your country'.

I think there were be an even further lowering of checks and balances among cops, and, because of that, there will be more cops who are simply criminals, in a uniform.

I think your cops are going to dress and act more as a military style police, esp if a demo or such like, appears to be gathering.

New laws against assembly and demo's could be passed, to make merely protesting a potential crime.

With a loss of more jobs, and the creation of no real good jobs, or just any jobs, and with less and less people being attracted to volunteering to fight in perpetual war, an artificial situation may be engineered, in which large pockets of people are so disenfrachised, that they have no choice but to be drafted even, to act as the next round of fodder.

I think you will see the US become more isolated, more arrogant and dismissive of that though, it almost does not matter who wins, some of what I said, at least two thirds of it, WILL be imposed on you or happen, in the first two years.

Imo of course...

I think you willl see a greater even obsession with 'entertainments' and the privates lives of 'stars'.

They may relax drug laws, firstly, come on, they go where the money is, and second, well, an unhappy society, are a captive audience for things that get them through the day, maybe opium. Dope em up, keep them benign.

There will be historical and ultimately damaging changes that impact on your supreme court, and all other high level tiers of office.

Emergency laws will be passed, with the promise that any rights that you cede will be returned to you. They never will.

I doubt they will 'take away your guns', but they may revamp the legislation, and even make some money for themselves, by charging a tax for each one owned.

Might be your last charade of an election, as well.

Maybe by 4yrs, the people that really boss you, they will step out, from behind the curtain.

 

I'm still wondering why little old me is considered the only pessimist, and why when bad things perpetually happen as a result of the policies coming from the two party statists more people don't wonder if maybe the system is broken?

 

Because they are stoopid and don't 'wonder'....at all?

 

The more people I see texting driving the more pessimistic about life I become.

If a candidate made driving and texting punishable by death I'd vote for them.

Honestly, drunk driving and driving while texting should be considered attempted murder.

See how pessimistic I am?

Let's be sad together.

 

Dept of (ahem) Homeland Security have already formally identified a likely terrorist in the US, to be male, middle class, and white.

They mean in % terms. It is probably a lie, but that is what they are putting out, slowly.

So expect more white, middle class males to be held without due process and dissapeared.

 

When you say white, do you mean hispanic/arab white?

Or white in its purest and most superior form, German?

 

Ask the Dept of Homeland Sec.

They just said 'white middle class male'.

 

Hopefully they just mean the Jews

 

Okay...I'd share some grade A alcohol with you, but you're not here.

 

Cheers, in spirit.

 

Well, you can faff around and play that game if you want, but hey, I am sure that all people that felt the brunt of something, have often laughed, all the way up until it was their turn...

Right?

Homeland Security training video portrays all “terrorists” as white, middle class males

If you see something silly, say something: Homeland Security training video portrays all “terrorists” as white, middle class males

Don’t they know stereotyping causes alienation, and alienation and poor self-esteem lead to radicalization? Now these poor men are going to have to deal with those additional radicalized Misunderstanders of Middle America and worry about backlash because of their portrayal in this video! And this is going to damage our standing with middle-class white guys abroad in nations that are our Friends and Allies, and create even more terrorists.

Of course, the intention seems obvious. But by bending over so far backward to show they aren’t singling out any other group, they appear to have created a study in absurdity. As James Thurber once cautioned, “You might as well fall flat on your face as lean over too far backward.”

“Who does Homeland Security thinks poses the greatest risk? Video portrays white middle-class as the most likely terrorists,” from the Daily Mail, July 22:

A video released by the Department of Homeland Security urging people to report anything suspicious has caused outrage by characterising white middle class Americans as the most likely terrorists. The promotional video is part of Homeland Security’s $10million ‘See Something, Say Something’ programme as they believe it will help curb random acts of terrorism by individuals.

But the controversial video has angered some Americans due to the fact all the actors who play the would-be terrorists in the video are white, and the people who report them are either black, Asian or Arab. What would happen – it is asked – if it was the other way about?

Lawsuits. Oodles and oodles of lawsuits.

The ten-minute clip shows a number of scenarios in which different behaviours which could be characterised as terrorism are played out.

These include – wearing a hooded top, driving vans, opposing surveillance footage, using a video camera, talking to police officers and recording something on your smartphone, among others.

The voice over urges viewers not to consider a person’s race when making a decision on whether or not they are a terrorist. [...]

DHS has confirmed the video is theirs but adamantly deny there are any racial or politically correct overtones to it.

via Homeland Security training video portrays all “terrorists” as white, middle class males.

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2011/07...s-all-terrorists-as-white-middle-class-males/

 

According to people in the know, the Dems keep the Senate. Republicans keep the house. So it does not matter who wins. We are getting divided government.

 

are you sure thats not a likely serial killer ?

 

It may be.

It is now also the DOHS main profile as a 'terrorist'.

As per the above link/post.

It is called laying the foundations to declare any American, that is white, or belongs to maybe a protest group, as being a 'domestic terrorist'.

An out of control Gollem is what has been allowed to grow.

And it will turn on Americans, no question, no matter who they vote for.

 

Youre not a pessimist because bad things happen. We've all known those cheery people who see the best in everyone, for example one who'd say of Romney, "oh I think he's a totally wonderful famoly man!" You're the complete opposite. You could be presented with the real life Romney feeding deer, with birds chirping from his shoulder as he walks through the forest, and you'd still say, "cultist-vile-rapacious-war-mongering-pig." Or something like that. That's why you're a pessimist, not because things are bad, but because you see the worst in them.

Idealists usually fit this mold, and libertarians are usually idealists , so what we're really saying is you're a die-in-the-wool pessimistic-idealistic-libertarian.