Countless times, across countless venues for discussion, those who support greater firearm-related restrictions continue to propose the same restrictions, over and over again. Everything proposed on the part of themselves ultimately boils down to nothing more than new paperwork requirements that are easily subverted, which will do nothing to prevent even a single firearm finding its way into the hands of an individual who not only should not have access to it, but also should not be free in society to begin with yet is anyway. The only individuals negatively affected are those who try and comply with the law to remain law-abiding by nature. None of these individuals are willing to propose what is in need of being proposed. Their recommendations boil down to little more than pointless harassment for the sake of harassment. None of them are serious in their claims about wanting to save lives, or reduce the levels of violence illegally committed with firearms. As such it is time to put for a proposal that amounts to far more than meaningless paperwork and vague terminology. It is time to demonstrate a willingness to actually do something about the perceived problems plaguing the united states. First and foremost, the possession of all firearms, regardless of individuals or circumstances will be prohibited. Criminals, prohibited individuals, private citizens, security guards, bodyguards, celebrities, politicians, and any other group will all be treated equally on the matter. The only exceptions will be law enforcement officers during official duties, and military personnel stations abroad. When their official duties end, their legal possession of firearms ends with it. Second, any individual in the united states found in possession of a firearm, regardless of circumstances, will be subject to immediate execution on the spot without arrest, formal charges, or trial, by duly authorized law enforcement empowered to deliver such force. The only exception will be for individuals who are found in possession of a firearm while in the presence of their family. Under such circumstances they will be restrained and left alive, but every present member of their family will be executed in their place, regardless of age. The precedent for such already exists, as the united states federal government is no stranger to killing citizens for what is ultimately tax evasion. It is the reason Eric Garner was choked to death without trial, as his crime was suspicion of selling untaxed cigarettes. The precedent exists, therefore it can be utilized. Such is the proposal that is put forth, and such is the only proposal that stands any chance of actually being effective at achieving the desired and intended goals. If others do not have the appetite to propose or otherwise support such a drastic approach to the matter at hand, they should stop their pretending that they are actually serious about the subject. Discuss.
It would appear that there is not a single individual present who is interested in legitimately discussing truly effective firearm-related restrictions.
Man and some have called me extreme in my views. You would start a civil war with those types of regulations. 1) mandatory sentencing laws for gun related crimes, no paroles. 2) death penalty for all premeditated murders, regardless of weapon used. 3) fast track all death penalty cases, no more sitting on death row for 20 plus years. 4) prison needs to be ''hard time" no more luxuries in prison. Many prisoners have it better than our military. That's just not right.
And yet they would ultimately work in addressing the matter. Such would not work, as most firearm-related offenses are dropped before the suspect ever makes it to a courtroom. Nationally only about five percent of all firearm-related offenses committed in the united states ever make it to trial. Such would indeed be supported. Is that not what the general population of prisons is for? So that the inmates are able to kill one another for whatever reason? Agreed.
An effort to determine who truly is serious about addressing and ending firearm-related incidents in the united states, and who is not serious about such.
Is it being stated on the part of yourself that such would not work? If it would not, then ultimately why not?
It is merely a recognition of the fact that current proposals for firearm-related restrictions are drafted with planned obsolescence in mind. They are intentionally designed to fail, so that their failure may be used to build support for the passage of more firearm-related restrictions to address the included failures of previous proposals, while containing failures of their own that must be addressed by still-future proposals for more firearm-related restrictions. It is nothing more than a game to those who hold office. It is time for someone to treat the matter seriously and see who stands where.
I don't get it, what's wrong with what we have now, other than its open and flagrant infringements upon the 2nd? We need to get back to the basics, as the Founders' intended...
you have stated in this forum that human life has no value (including your own), suicide should be allowed, illegal immigrants should be shot dead on the border, and criminals should be utilized in any violent revolt against the govt. frankly, your views are null, void and irrelevent.
As compared to any other particular view that one may come across with a simple search of the internet?
