There seems to be a massive number of people around the globe, who think recent acts of terrorism are justified, due to the circumstances of Gaza. I don't care to argue that point, but I'm curious why only third parties seem to make that point. When pressed on recent events, there is a lot of denial, where one would have expected a more "justified" stance. Perhaps there is general disorganization, and the brightest and best might not be doing the speaking. But it seems to me, if the public or media is willing to accept the necessity of such things, why are only third parties making that point, generally speaking? If it is justified, why not just own it, and adopt a stance that these terrible things were only done out of desperation? Denial seems like a no-win scenario, and I don't understand it being adopted. I don't care to argue if it's justified or not. I'm not sure a single mind could be changed about that. So please, there are many threads; I'm just interesting in hearing the view of people in the know. Feel free to insult me, and my ignorance. But I just want to be clear I'm not interested in personally participating in the general debate here.
