Report; Three new chemical attacks.

That is an Israeli allegation.
The Israelis covet Syria and are behind the terrorists rampaging around doing the most vile & vicious of deeds to the Syrian people of all ages and sex.

Since it was the USA/Israeli/Saudi gang that first talked about poison gas, it is natural for the US's Allah-Akhbar terrorists to use poison gas as part of their slaughter fest against Syria.

But none of this counts with the Pavlovian conditioned,duped, deceived, collectively insane American public who have adopted Talmudic thinking.
They count the accusations against Syria as of prime importance and as completely valid regardless of all facts to the contrary.

 

Actually Ivan it was the FRENCH that alerted the world to Assad's use of Chemical Weapons and if you try to tell me or anyone else here that the FRENCH are in league with the U.S. Military Industrial Complex we will all laugh you off the board.

AboveAlpha

 

Go ahead and laugh. The French are a pack of hypocrits and yes men for someone more powerful than them.
The Syrians had them figured out in 1919 as an unworthy bunch to rely on.
The French were all gung ho to destroy Libya and spoke mountains of lies to justify that too.
So their word on anything about Syria is not valid.

Besides, a mere accusation is nothing. Something that a lot of so called Americans don't seem to comprehend.
Neither do they realize that the accused is not required to respond to rumors, perjured or baseless accusations and slanders.

The accuser must prove his accusation by 2 or 3 witnesses faithful to the truth. That is what the Prophet Moses taught. But a lot of Americans have joined the Synogog of Satan and don't need such witnesses. All they need is an accusation and their feelings.

 

Ivan...personally...if it was up to me...as long as Syria and Assad wasn't found to be using Chemical Weapons I would care less about Syria....as I am sick to death of having to fight battles for people that are too cowardice to fight their own.

AboveAlpha

 

So, what's your point?

 

Here's a useful ' Stop the War Coalition ' address for concerned Brits;

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/get-involved/local-groups

Anybody got one for the US , France or Germany ?

 

I could say there is an allarming disarray on the rebel side,
who would kill fellow Syrians by the way, "in the most horrific way"
indiscriminate and demonic.

 

It's likely that many of the militia ranks are not Syrians at all. Why should they care if Syrians die ? It's all part of their job. ' Blackwater ' in a different theatre.

 

I rather think that they've leaned it from Duvrovka Theater, way back October 2002.

 

They give away free key chains in the Synogog of Satan, its stupid NOT to join it + the hours are very flexable.

 

Let's hope that that's the additional weight needed to deliver a kick to the bollox of the pro-war lobby- including its neoZionist factions.

 

What bollox? this op has no bollox, it is reduced to the bombing of a tree in syria by a cowardly leadership, to all sides concered it will be better if Assad will agree to bomb a few empty buildings on his own and let the Americans take pictures, Israel can set of a few mines in Golan heights and take pictures and that will be all...


So 120,000 ppl died in Syria......it will pass....

 

No it won't- and Israel's role will be another strike against Zionism.

 

No. If you asked Americans what they wanted after 9/11 you wouldn't be posting today. Don't underestimate an angry mob. They may be slow to end wars, but they won't be slow to start them, and they would not leash the military.

 

And yet both Britain and America seem convinced it was Assad who was the perpetrator of the alleged attacks, despite the absence of any concrete evidence? Perhaps he was, perhaps he wasn't. Even Britain's Joint Intelligence Committee is hedging its bets, saying it is "highly likely" that Assad did it. "Highly likely" is not definitive proof and amounts to no more than 'maybe' or an educated guess.

 

This isn't 9/11 . This is Israel's war - as far as AIPAC is concerned - and Americans don't want it

 

Your question was about direct democracy. There would be no syria to argue over if we had that on 9/12/2001.

- - - Updated - - -

Much better argumment then the normal Zionist this Zionist that we hear around here usually.

 

Thought Obama Admin replaced Bush's, but the secretary stayed!!! warmongering B!tch.......

 

BS, both Assad and the rebels are viewed as enemies to Israel, if anything the objective is to keep them both fighting each other and that cant be achived without Assad.

 

Well you sure seem to waive dead Syrians like flies from shiiet, and what's that about Israel? how are we connected to your mass murderer scum or your total indifference to the massacre there ?

 

Imo, it doesn't matter who used the CWs, Assad or the extremists, when it comes to whether or not there should be a UN or US without UN attack on Syria.

If Assad used them, then a UN action that discourages further commanders' use of CW's would be necessary for future worldwide deterrence reasons. It also may be necessary to save lives in Syria and elsewhere, as these relatively small uses (if by Assad) could be test cases for not only Assad, but all commanders who would use CW's in the future. If it was Assad, and the world does nothing, there could be much more gassing in the future, as Assad would be learning how to use them more effectively simply from the very use of them.

But if Assad didn't use them, and it was some rogue general, the rebels, or the extremists who did, UN or US military action is still warranted because the situation indicates that Assad is losing control of the security of WMD's within his state. The world cannot sit idly by as nations with WMD capability fall into lawlessness, or as they lose security of their WMD's. This is true for all WMD states. If they collapse and fall into anarchy, or there is a possibility of this happening (which the use of WMD's inside Syria indicates may be happening there), or if the security of the WMD's is somehow otherwise affected during a conflict, it is in all world nations' interests to act. This would be true in the collapse of the US, UK, France, Israel, Syria, China, Russia, India, Pakistan, or any other nations with large stockpiles of WMD's (Syria, I believe has one of the largest stockpiles of CW's in the world).

 

Tell the forum how many times- that we know about- that Israel has attacked/bombed Syria over the past two years.

 

Twice? and you suggest that that is the reason the rebels fight Assad? you get an "A" in deflection "F" in relevance.

 

Ah, so Israel attacking Syria doesn't figure in your list of ' things worth mentioning '

Tell the forum which foreign country illegally occupies Syria's Golan Heights.

 

Forgetting the irrelevance of Israel with regard to respect for international law, this is the nub of the parliamentary discussion currently being held in that capital of the arms trade- Westminster;