Resistance to the death of Net Neutrality?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Derideo_Te, Dec 15, 2017.

  1. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't even think the consumer will see a price increase immediately. I'm thinking about this based on what I would do in their shoes as a business.

    First I'd target the streaming services and see how much each was willing to pay me to NOT throttle back their consumers bandwidth. Get some nice figures from each then lock them into a bidding war with each other to see who is willing to pay the most. Whoever wins gets unlimited bandwidth from their subscribers, the losers get throttled. I'd see how much extra revenue that generates me from say Netflix who won while keeping my own streaming service at the normal price.

    The reason is because while the ISPs can basically operate with immunity now because they are often the only show in town, it still doesn't bode well for any corporation to have it's customers think you are evil. Take a look at what EA tried to do with that new Star Wars game. They got HAMMERED and the public outcry was so bad that Disney itself is considering yanking their license to even make Star Wars games anymore because they tarnished the image so badly.

    If say XFINITY tried to just come right out of the gate and increase the prices of XFINITY streaming service while throttling everybody else's like Netflix and Hulu then the public outcry would be too much. Even though they COULD do that because Comcast is the only provider in a lot of places, that would still be terrible for their public image. That would be just to blatant, they would have to do this slowly.

    I see most of this being done behind the scenes with the media juggernauts like Amazon and Youtube being extorted while the consumer base is left alone. Then in the future possibly slowly trying to implement some sort of small upgrades that don't seem like bandwidth hostage scenarios such as what Netflix already does in making you pay for "Netflix Premium Plan" to stream 4K content. It's worded in such a way and included in a package that allows streaming on multiple tv's and sort of thrown in there as fine print.

    Netflix was smart, if they would have just flat out said "4K Streaming Capable Package" then people would be pissed off because they already pay for Netflix and pay for their own internet which has the speed necessary to stream 4K, but Netflix won't let you watch 4K unless you buy the "Premium" package. So they included it in a bundle that allows streaming on 4 TV's simultaneously AND 4K instead of coming out and just flat out saying "We want to charge you extra to stream 4K".

    Thats what I believe these ISPs will do. They can't be blatant in their predatory practices it doesn't work out too well anymore. The internet will lose it's mind on them and that is not good for business or public image. Just ask Electronic Arts who thought they could get away with putting gambling in their Star Wars game because they had exclusive rights to Star Wars and no competition and ended up unifying the internet together in the largest show of force against a corporation in the history on Reddit. Their shares tanked, the sold very few games, and they lost billions. ISP's are no fools, they will tread lightly with this.
     
    Curious Yellow likes this.
  2. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jesus...
     
    Curious Yellow and Derideo_Te like this.
  3. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is NOW!

    What will it be AFTER the greedy ISP's start raising the rates for "high speed access"?
     
  4. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Greed is greed and since PF is a forum that exposes that greed shutting down that criticism makes perfect sense to ISP's.
     
  5. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is already possible to do via Wifi nets. Many places overseas don't have cable so they use Wifi nets to cover large areas. The same thing can be accomplished with smaller Wifi systems chaining together. In essence Wifi can bypass broadband and with a couple of nonprofit broadband ISP startups access to the internet can continue.

    Granted that won't help Facebook or Amazon but they are big enough to take on the ISP's when they lose customers. It is entirely possible that they could be champions of the resistance if they decide that NN is preferable. But that is still TBD.

    As far as the resistance goes it looks like it already started.

    https://www.wired.com/story/after-fcc-abandons-net-neutrality-states-take-up-the-fight/

     
  6. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice analysis! :)

    I agree with what you are saying about the corporate motivation to recapture the revenue lost from cutting the TV cable.

    While PF is small it is an influential voice that is monitored by political news media. The opinions expressed here are a tool that they use to measure the effectiveness of their own content at reaching their target markets.

    In that respect there is value in silencing the criticism that is being leveled at corporations who are gouging the public both on the consumer end and as donors who control Congress. That alone makes PF a threat that corporations would prefer did not exist. It isn't government censorship to make "free speech" unaffordable on the internet since it is corporations doing the dirty work.

    We already saw what happened with Citizens United so handing over control of free speech via the internet to corporations is unlikely to have an outcome that is beneficial to We the People IMO.
     
  7. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And if you can't afford those added fees?
     
  8. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good analogy but personally I believe you are giving the ISP's far too much credit for good sense. My own experience in corporate America tells me that greed and profits always override common sense and public perception awareness until AFTER it bites them in the ass. There is a great deal of arrogance in boardrooms and competition amongst executives to be the one who increases profits the most. They will blow off anything that might stant in the way of raising the value of their share options.

    Yes, you are probably right that the internet will rise up in protest when this happens but it is not the threat of that happening that will keep corporations from going after profits everywhere they can. The other analogy here could well be the greed based HMO's whose profit motivation ultimately gave rise to Obamacare and in all likelihood will result in Single Payer of some kind. As you pointed out ISP's like Comcast do have a monopoly in some areas and they will exploit that to the hilt because they have a track record of doing that already.
     
  9. SkullKrusher

    SkullKrusher Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    5,032
    Likes Received:
    2,137
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So the 3 biggest abusers, Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T, who caused so many complaints from customers for throttling bandwidth, such that the net neutrality legislation of 2015 was implemented to correct, are now promising us all that its in our best interest that the regulations be completely removed.

    Somehow, I am extremely doubtful, I don't know what it is, maybe 40 years of observation, IDK, something, my gut.. personal experience, , something, reminding me of previous collusion,.. maybe it was something I read in Adam Smiths book Wealth of Nations...you know, Adam Smith the "Father of Capitalism"..that guy, Maybe he was just wrong. Corporations would never collude to control the market, would they?
     
  10. Jimmy79

    Jimmy79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    9,366
    Likes Received:
    5,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you dont get them.
     
  11. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In other words people won't be able to afford to have internet access any longer.

    Got it!
     
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, you haven’t noticed the continued increases under Obama’s NN?
     
  13. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How many websites have been throttled since 2015?
     
  14. Jimmy79

    Jimmy79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    9,366
    Likes Received:
    5,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Simple internet access, like this site, wont really be affected. Its going to be youtube, netflix and youporn that really feel the bite.

    Of course thats my opinion though.

    I do wonder why you are showing such hostility towards me though.
     
  15. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you can't afford the increased ISP fees that will mean you won't have access to PF or anything else for that matter.

    What "hostility" do you imagine is being shown towards you?
     
  16. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How many were before 2015?
     
  17. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for confirming that NN works and should not be scrapped and the internet exploited by the greedy ISP corporations.
     
  18. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Translation - you have no clue so provide a non-answer
     
  19. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ironic!
     
  20. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are upset I cannot provide an unknown number?
     
  21. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not in the least. I am amused that you cannot admit that your position has been exposed as groundless.
     
  22. Jimmy79

    Jimmy79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    9,366
    Likes Received:
    5,074
    Trophy Points:
    113

    I dont see prices going up in general, at least not right away. I think they are going to be targeted at streaming services that compete with the ISPs streaming services. Gaming services like PlayStation Network, Xbox live, and Steam I see as othrt likely targets.
     
  23. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By you? Bwahahaha! You can’t even provide numbers.
     
  24. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True, but if corporations started messing with normal websites outside of streaming services then they dive into the mess of 1st Amendment issues. I don't think any company wants to deal with that mess nor wants to get accused of censoring content on political grounds. That would be catastrophic and probably illegal. Its one thing to mess with streaming services that are pure entertainment, it's a whole other animal when messing with opinion pieces and news outlets.

    Any company caught throttling back say, CNN, for ANY REASON would ignite a firestorm of 1st Amendment issues. Same with all other news sites, forums, etc. Even if an ISP messed with extremist sites like Stormfront they would catch royal hell. The 1st Amendment isn't something taken lightly here, you don't want to be the company caught or even accused of messing around with that.

    I think we're safe, but again this is pure speculation on my part, company's have indeed surprised me before with their antics so...
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  25. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It won't happen "right away" but it will happen. It happened to cable in just that way. Little by little choices were limited and costs increased and that's exactly what happened to cable. 10 years from now you won't recognize the internet and you'll be bitching about it like we do with cable but it won't matter. It will be too late.

    By that point we'll be conditioned to accept it and younger people will have nothing to compare it to.
     
    Curious Yellow and Derideo_Te like this.

Share This Page