Robert Mueller’s Written Questions for President Trump May Signal the Beginning of the End

Like I said...no worries there Professor.
Until January.

 

Oh please

You are tickling my Barfometer with quotes like that

We may look back and yearn for the days of innocence before Mueller and the Deep State announced its dictatorship

But hail mueller as a hero?

Not on your life

 

Who said hero? Your paranoia is becoming quite transparent....

Quick History question - It's been 20 years now.....What was the name of the Independent Counsel who investigated Bill Clinton?

 

I have a bad memory for names but you seem to be reenforcing my position

Trump is a far more significent figure than any of the annoying little yap dogs nipping at his ankles

 

It was brought up in the trial. You do remember that he pled guilty to a bunch of charges, right?

 

L

This comment Shows how deluded TDS has made certain people. Mueller booked a couple of guys for a couple of weeks in prison and you’re “happy with the ones he got”.

Something tells me your virtue signaling programming would kick in instantly if it minority’s serving a month or 2 for marijuana possession of something dumb like that. That’s just an assumption on my part.


Petty jail time for “crimes” that don’t need to be prosecuted is wrong , that’s true whether I like the person or not.

 

I think we've heard that before. Clinton survived lying under oath, I'm sure Trump will survive telling the truth or even refusing to answer.

 

that isn’t really that relevant to the question that was asked to you. Answer the question.

It’s funny because a lot of pro “indepent counsel” require that you extrapolate even after top cop mueller has allegedly got results.

The poster ask you about mama fort selling positions and your reply is “he plead guilty to some stuff bro”.

Where is the charges related to him selling positions of whatever you claimed.

 

Sure, he nailed a few small fish, but Manafort is probably done and Cohen will be doing a decent spell... Flynn probably won't get much however..

There are still fish in the water and Muellers not using a single pole anymore...

I agree with ron... would love to see Junior on an indictment, just to read the Trump tweets.... He'd actually BREAK HIS CAP LOCK BUTTON!!!

 

The charges against him included the loan given to him by Calk, who he then shopped for administration spots. The crime was getting the loan by defrauding the bank. Calk was a co-conspirator.

 

No he lied to the guy to get a loan, that was the crime. There was never any job for him, nothing mention to the president about him

 

I never said that the President was directly involved in this issue. Just that Manafort was trying to sell a position. Whether that was completely in his power or not is irrelevant. He had connections through Gates, another criminal, who was still working in the campaign.

 

https://abc7chicago.com/politics/ga...tephen-calk-who-loaned-him-millions-/3901987/

Why do you people think everything shitty that happened in 2016 has to revolve around Trump DIRECTLY to be considered a crime worth pursuing?? He's slime, but there was plenty of other sliminess going on around him that he possibly knew nothing about.....

 

He wasn’t trying to sell anything is my point. He had no intent to sell a job. He lied to her a loan

 

She's a he

She is a he.
He tried to sell a job for a loan. Almost worked. He did get the loan.

Tuesday afternoon, Rick Gates testified that his then-business partner Manafort requested him to use his position in the Trump campaign to offer a series of favors to Stephen Calk, the founder and CEO of Federal Savings Bank, one of the banks that extended Manafort sizeable loans in 2016. Calk had been on Trump's small panel of economic advisors in the summer of 2016 when Manafort was campaign chairman.

In court on Tuesday assistant U.S. attorney Greg Andres handed Gates e-mails from Manafort, showing that Gates's former boss requested that he use his position in the Trump campaign to offer special favors to the founder and CEO of Chicago's Federal Savings Bank.

The first favor was discussed two weeks after Trump's election. Manafort pushed Calk's name as US Secretary of the Army, Gates testified. Calk's Federal Savings Bank had just loaned Manafort millions. According to Special Counsel Robert Mueller the loans were consummated under false pretenses.

"We need to discuss Steve Calk for Sec(retary) of the Army," Manafort wrote to Gates in the email dated Nov. 24, 2016. Manafort apparently had knowledge that there was an imminent decision to be made by the yet-to-be inaugurated president.

 

They project how they feel and what they do onto others. It's their only real skill.

 

Your BLOTUS tied himself to that meeting by conspiring with little Donnie jr to fabricate the "adoption" bovine excrement excuse. As with Nixon it is the attempt by the Oval office to conceal the crime that will bring him down.

 

https://law.stanford.edu/2018/08/22/cohen-trump-and-campaign-finance-violations/

https://www.vox.com/2018/11/9/18079754/trump-cohen-hush-money-mcdougal-stormy-daniels

 

As usual you are WRONG on ALL counts!

The limits are either credible evidence or statutes of limitations.

Denial that there is already evidence uncovered of the crimes that your BLOTUS committed during the campaign does not alter the factual reality of that documented evidence.

 

Yes, Cohen pleaded GUILTY to those campaign finance crimes and INDICTED your BLOTUS in his plea statement.

Now it is just a matter of time before your BLOTUS needs to answer for those charges himself.

I suspect that there will be others alongside those which is why the investigation is still in progress.

 

I refuse to believe anybody who dislikes the Clintons isn't going to have Ken Starr tattooed in their brain forever.. Just put that in reverse for those of us who dislike Trump...

 

Wish all you want. And then wonder, given we actually do have significant evidence of criminal activity initiated by the HRC and DNC why mr Mueller hasn't looked their way yet. If, as you say, credible evidence and statute of limitations are his only limitations, clearly, he could rapidly move in those directions, could he not?

 

Ah yes... Cohen. Where did he plead again? To whom? Referred out of the SPs office because why again? Take your time here...

 

I try to avoid lib tatoo parlors

If I had needed to know Ken Starr’s name I can look it up

 

Puerile attempt to deflect attention owing to terminal HDS duly noted and ignored for obvious reasons.