Ron Paul simple did not get elected because the elite did not want him .deal with it.

kinda like the nonsense YOU vomit that oswald was the lone assassin.

love how you SELECT posts I have posted instead of addressing other posts with FACTS i post that proves this to all be true.

 

yep the establishment did which is why they rigged the elections.

myself and somone else handed your ass to you on a platter on the JFK assassin a couple months ago and you ran off after that when you could not think of any more lies to post to try and save face.

I'll be happy to take you to school on that again if you wish since you want to talk about that subject so much and want to embarrass yourself again like you have on this entire thread.

Just come here to this thread.

http://www.politicalforum.com/jfk/2...ll-kennedy-but-did-not-kill-tippet-wel-3.html

and try to counter these facts I listed in this first post on this page,you cant.nobody ever has been able to.they always play dodgeball and never address facts and run off when cornered with them like you did back then.instead of beaing mature and admitting defeat since they know they can cowardly hide behind the computer.

this is the ron paul thread,so go there if you want to embarrass yourself again and I'll meet you there.Im not going to discuss that here anymore since again,this is the ron paul thread.

 

Yes, we are a trading nation, yet, so many call for sanctions. You referred to Cuba, but take not of the Cuban embargo. Also, what exactly did we benefit in commerce by getting involved in Somalia in the early 90s?

There is a difference between the wars against the Barbary Pirates and the piracey of this age, such as in the case of the Somali pirates. Somali pirates do not offer sovereign powers a target. When Commodores Preble, Bainbridge, and Decatur were dispatched by the United States to deal with the Barbary problem, they knew where the enemy’s operational bases were and who was in charge: the Pasha of Tripoli, the Dey of Algiers, and the Dey of Tunis. They did not have to patrol the whole Mediterranean; they went directly to the source of the crisis and forced the scurvy miscreants to cease and desist from attacking American vessels.

Somalia, as an anarchic failed state, does not offer such discrete targets. The Somali pirates, according to open source information, operate from many coastal villages and off-shore mother ships. Naval or aerial bombardment of their coastal bases would likely result in high collateral casualties to civilian population. And patrolling a couple million square miles of the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean would be impractical and cost-prohibitive for the U.S. Navy, not to mention the fact that it also would divert naval resources from the primary mission of protecting America.

Throughout history, privateers have played an important role in combating piracy, and there’s good reason to think they could do so again. As in the early years of our nation, Congress could issue letters of marque and reprisal authorizing private parties, individuals or corporations (no matter what Romney said, there is a difference), to go after pirates and/or terrorists.

Placing bounties on the heads of villains would cost a lot less than current policies.

Yes, we give back much of the land we invade, but the fact we are involved in so many of the world's affairs for global interests and on a global scale is why we are seen as an empire. We get involved in the affairs of other countries which often times, frankly, is none of our business. Why is it our business what type of government exists in Egypt, Libya, or Syria, for example? Also, even though we often give back the land, we also often occupy and we always contribute toward the growing $17 trillion debt in paying for our foreign policy. Can we afford to continue to involve ourselves in the affairs of other countries?

 

it's funny how you keep using the same excuse as republicans

and if there was any rigging attempt, it was by ron paul and his band of raving paultards, when they tried to hijack the gop primary process like some kind of delusional pirates

how many times did i tell you it wasn't going to work?

 

I notice my challenge here to come down to my thread in the JFK section to try and debunk my facts that prove oswald innocent of both shootings and that there is TONS of evidence that prove the CIA did it wasnt taken up by him.

No surprise there,they never do,they can talk crap and hide behind the net, but when confronted with facts they know they cant refute that there were multiple shooters and even the HSCA investigation said there were TWO shooters,they turn hightail and run everytime.


some people just have too much pride to admit when they have been proven wrong. dont know why it hurts them so much to admit defeat.Looks like my ignore list is going to grow larger now.


and on the TOPIC of paul,I see like everybody else has that has come on here,has failed as well and disproving me that there is a difference between Obozo and Mittens,not even bothering to try and counter theose facts,no surprise whatsoever,like clockwork.hee hee.

 

Back to the topic here again now.tell me YOUR opinion on this Turin,why if you dont mind?

 

Here are MORE reasons why you were a complete fool in this past election if you voted for Obomination or Mittens instead of Paul or Gary Johnson.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6a9549ZeqQ&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1NDs4RMbHU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tYcH1BeSc4&feature=related

makes perfect since to me and yet we got government apologists coming on here saying ron paul is a loon for wanting to rightly so,get rid of the CIA which has even ADMITTED and came out recently saying there behind the assassination of Irans leader in the early 50's when their role as Harry Truman created them,was their job duties ONLY consisted of gathering information on other countries and reporting it directly to the president.

Yet,according to at least ONE poster here, paul is somehow a loon for wanting them to stop killing other human beings and stop being a policy firm for our government,something they were never intended to do by Truman.Okayyyyyyyy

 

Conspiracy theorism...is a religion. A "maltheism" if you like.

From a pure psychological standpoint, it is much "easier" on the mind of the conspiracist to beleive that "the Devil is in charge"....than believe "Nobody is in charge, bad things just happen."

 

They are like political patisans in many ways. Nothing new here.

 

One of the things that disturbs me the most is that a huge percentage of Ron Paul's supporters seem to be conspiracy theorists. And I find that very frightening.

This is the same kind of mindset that allowed a past Leader to convince a country that everything bad that was happening to it was the fault of other groups, and that those groups should be eliminated as "enemies of the Reich".

So the very fact that these people grasp onto conspiracy theories is the exact same reason why I refuse to support them, even on the areas we agree upon. I see them as mentally unstable, and not to be put in charge of anything.

 

whats funny about your post is the governments version of events are almost always conspiracy THEORIES with no evidence or facts to back them up.Just wacky theories.

 

Hee Hee.Like clockwork,I see all the government apologists not only change the subject and refuse to address my facts I posted on the first post on the first page,but everyone of them that have posted on this thread earlier wont address this post either since they know it proves how evil an organization the CIA is and Ron Paul is not the loon that some fools on here have made him out to be.

 

RIP Wellstone:

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/110102_wellstone.html

 

the people in power wanted Romney, the people that vote wanted Obama, those in power do not always win.....

 

The American people suffer from mass attention deficit syndrome. As a nation we cannot concentrate on any issue long enough to obtain any kind of real understanding. We are drones who are addicted to instant gratification and political issues are not simple instant subjects.

As a result we allow our decision making process to be determined by 30 second propaganda pieces designed for instant gratification of our predetermined prejudices.

The elite do not have to rig elections, they simply have to program the people to do their bidding.. The television was the end of any sort of self determination of the American people.

 

Nope he didn't get elected because he only had a cult following, and was never a mainstream candidate. Not really sure how good or bad he'd have been for the country, but that's the reason - no "Zionist Jewish conspiracy needed"