Rudy Giuliani’s Hair Dye Streaks Down Face After ‘My Cousin Vinny’ Performance

Representative Lee Zeldin, NY.----??

 

You have to do that, if Borat's 15 year old daughter is to old for you.

 

And 100% true. Every word.

 

It's unbelievable. Are there any numbers that would set off alarm bells for you? 85%? 99.9% turnout sound right to you? Dont tell me turnout numbers have no connection to fraud, they do, and 75%+ does it for me.

 

No, 75% does not set off alarm bells. I'm not in the habit of making things up in my head, then believing they are real.

 

I'm usually on the right side here...for years. If you leave Iraq terrorists will explode and Baghdad will fall under the influence of Iran. Legal gay marriage. Zimmerman innocent. Confederate flag comes down. Trump wins primaries. On and on.

Soon to be: Rittenhouse innocent and massive voter fraud in America's major cities.

 

Yes but would 99.9?

 

Not conspiracy. Perfectly normal assumptions based on life experience and turnout numbers. For example, you would feel exactly as I do if the US turnout was reported at 99.9% Based on no other evidence, you would feel there was fraud based on a reported turnout number. I would bet the same would be true if it was 99.8, 99.7, or maybe even 95. Can you please explain to me as if I were a 5 year old as to what exact turnout number and below does someone have to suspect before you can legitimately call that person a conspiracy theorist?

 

Basically follow this rule" do not believe everything that hear nor everything that you read. Question everything because some people will try to lie to you.

As you get older and go through life you will be told things of which some will be true others will not be true. You will hear or read things such as " it was reported that 99.8 or 99.9 % of people voted. You need to ask the question who "reported" such a thing? You will need to ask to see proof that someone actually reported such a thing. You will need to determine if the person who claims that someone reported such a thing did not make up the "report" in order to falsely discredit someone or some organization. In common terms youbwill Ned to determine if the person or persons who told you that there was a report that reported thatv99.8 or 99.9 turnout occurred did not just make up the " report".

You will have to determine if what someone tells you something was taken out of context by accident or maybe on purpose.

 

I'm sure glad we have a forum specifically for such emerging and highly important events like this one...

 

The voter turnouts are well known. So are population demographics. I can divide. PA was just shy of 75%(margin of error because I only included Biden and Trump votes at that time).

That percentage is right about the beginning of the spectrum of turnout ratios (75%-100%, in PA/US, right now) that starts to raise my suspicion. My earlier point was that you, and everyone else, has a certain spectrum in which they start to suspect (perhaps higher than mine) fraud...even if they have zero other knowledge of the election.

My question was on how to automatically determine a conspiracy theorist based on their turnout suspicion spectrum alone.

 

A 75 % margin of error is obsurd. Don't pee on our shoes and tell us it is raining.

I do not believe that there was any city or county that had a 100% voter turnout. There is a hamlet or two up in New Hamshire that has 20 or 21 voters so it could be possible that all 21 voters turned out. Those are the hamlets that vote at midnight on Election Day.

Do you have any evidence that there was a 100% turnout in a nkrmal sized town or county of state?

 

Lol you literally voted for a guy to be president who constantly mocks peoples appearance.

 

Who did he mock in say....the last several days since he does so "constantly"?

 

I voted on his policies.

 

So you’re only pretending to be bothered by mocking appearance

 

You appear to not grasp my point.

I said that Pennsylvania turnout was just shy of 75%, not margin of error. The possible error from my number comes from the fact that I calculated it a couple days after the election (more votes could have been added after I counted...ie lost USB drives turning up), and the fact I didn't tally any votes for other candidates. So if anything the PA turnout could actually be 75% by now and not just shy.

Now that we got the PA turnout number is about 75%, I can actually state my point: this number peaks my suspicion. It, by itself, does not lead me to automatically conclude fraud. But it does force me to start searching for any additional hints that fraud has occurred.

My secondary point is that you would feel the same way as I do upon hearing certain turnout numbers. I never said that 99.9% turnout was reported. I said if it were reported, you would feel suspicious. Everyone has a certain turnout number that would automatically raise their suspicions if it were reported.

Which raises the question: Which turnout numbers and below can you automatically dismiss as conspiracy theorist without risking being hypocritical or dishonest?

 

Not according to Lt. General Flynn:

"The greatest fraud ever ... We are going through a crucible of history and if we do not correct what is happening over the next couple of weeks … this country is done.”

And Lt. General McInerney:

https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv...lynns-first-interview-president-trumps-pardon

 

Florida had a 77% turnout. Was there fraud?

 

You accept the word of a self admitted criminal and liar. Hoe precious.

 

I have never been to Florida. I cant picture in my mind's eye everyone that I am acquainted with there. I need to do this in order to estimate about how many of them do I think voted. If the turnout percentage doesn't match the percentage in my head, I start to suspect, and then I am forced to look at other indicators.