Russia to West: D-Day wasnt decisive in ending WW2.

Russkis weren't concerned with rebuilding or letting the Germans rebuild!

 

Excellent piece of crazyness, madness and delirium.

If "Ukrainians and Belorussians" with "1 in 3 soldiers with rifles" defeated the German army and reached Berlin, the question is - what did you do all this time, with your bombers, trucks, ships, weaponry, ammunition, jeeps, small armoured vehicles???
If Germany could be defeated by such poorly armed crowd of various people from different countries and areas, which you described in your mad dream - why America/Britain/Canada didn't defeat Germany and liberate the whole Europe?
The German army, which crashed France (and British forces) in a couple of months, destroyed Poland in a couple of weeks, spent several days for invading and occupying countries like Netherlands, Norway, Denmark etc. - this army retreated under pressure of Red Army, which was "1 in 3 soldiers with rifles and an NKVD unit behind"??? Such idea may be born only in some sick head.

Wehrmacht was the best army in the world then. And this army lost to crowd of savages with 1 rifle for 3 soldiers? Funny, just funny.

How USSR could stand when Germans were deeply inside Russia? Without your "Ukranians, , Belorussians, and many other minorities"? Who defended Leningrad? Ukrainians? Who made first major defeat to Germany in WWII in the Battle of Moscow? Americans? Who surrounded and exterminated German and Romanian troops in Stalingrad? Canadians? Who fought in the worlds largest tank battle in Kursk? Brits?..

Of course, America helped USSR. Canned meat, cacao etc., it's ok, and it was very important, especially trucks, but you guys were somewhere else when the fate of WWII was determined in the Eastern Front. Besides, Lend Lease wasn't for free, the last payments Russia made to the USA in the 2000s.

As for your bombers, which allegedly "destroyed" Germany, the German GDP was growing until 1944.
The most qauntity of tanks, artillery guns and trucks Germany produced in 1944. Looks like you bombers weren't so good, ah? This is what you call "destroyed Germanys ability to effectively fight"???
While you were busy at "destroying Germanys ability to effectively fight" (and Germany the same time effectively built up its military industry), Soviet troops were in Poland, Hungary and Yugoslavia.

That's the truth. Simple facts. Not stupid fairy tales from liars.

 

Are you from russkie land? You amuse me. Come on, tell more horror stories

 

Uh yeah....mo

Wow....somebody is delirious.

Simple fact Krasnodarsky....is , is many Ukrainians and Belorussians died fighting the Germans...almost 90% of battles was fought on their soil....Moscow, Leningrad , Stalingrad, were for the most part on Russki soil.

Well yes....while we were bombing Germany....this greatly enabled the Sovs fighting ability....without it, you were ****ed. I don't recall reading any Soviet bombers over Berlin....because there wasn't any.

At first the US was heavily involved fighting the Japs....who hit us first. Technically the US really didn't have an axe to grind with the Krauts at first. Stalinovka was the one calling FDR for more and more aid.

Oh, our bombers were good....met their targets. If they hadn't.....let's just say many more vatniks would've made for lampshades in German living rooms.

As for Kursk....the Russkis knew of some of the German plans....blared it out on megaphones, and still almost lost the fight, hadn't the US landed in Sicily.


Uh yeah....we were elsewhere when stalinovka was calling.....fighting the Japs.

We fought the Japs....and the European theater, while supplying the Sovs....and we decisively made the difference whether you care to admit it or not.

 

I think you are doing a fantastic job of showcasing why German opinion or perspectives relate to WWII are irrelevant.

Keep going.

 

Yeah. Not exactly.

The assassination of Ferdinand was a catalyst, but not an act of war.

Germany's invasion of 2 countries was the act of war that kicked off the military engagement.

 

Cutting off supply lines is a tactic.

I'm sorry you cant accept that Germany has historically been an thorn in the side if peace, AND they keep getting their asses kicked.

 

Opinions become relevant with power. Money is power. And because of that we can make a old former enemy soldier dance like a monkey, while throwing scraps at the poor old beggar.

 

your origin is 6-10 000 year ago in the black sea so thats not possible
all blue eyes come from a single peron in that region according to research
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm

 

i have no issue with germany getting beat, i have a issue with starving civilian

germany only lost 2 major wars, they kicked the french pretty good 50years before wich led to ww1 revanchism in france for loosing strassbourg in the first place, wich also led to ww1 in a way

also WW1 wasnt started by Germany but by Serbia/Austria and a whole bunch of Royal idiots

pretty sure it basicle went like this
Serbia kills the crownprince of Austria in terrorist attack
Austria demands whole bunch of stuff as punishment
Serbia refused after guarantees from Russia they would protect them
Austria declares war on serbia after guarentee from Germany they would defend Austria if Russia attacks
Russia declares war on Austria after they got guarentee France would help
Germany declares war on Russia to protect Austria
France declares war on Germany to help Russia

Germany invades trough belgium(dick move) to kick France out of the war and gets bogged down in trenches
Uk declares war on Germany for invading Belgium
Russia invades Germany and gets his ass kicked multiple times and collapses in the progress (serves him right for escalating this whole war)

you starve germany into submission giving rise to the idea that Germany got cheated in WW1 and they didnt really loose, resulting in the Rise of Hitler

so my opinion Uk actions led directly to his rise by your tactic

 

Well we can agree that my basic stock on this lands is several thousand years

 

I too believe Germany is the most 'advanced' in Europe. Advanced as in industrious, things made with planning, discipline and brains. Some 50 years ahead of the UK let's say, and it's amazing considering the circumstances.
Still, I would not consider living in Germany, maybe it's just me, not my type of cake.

Having travelled to v poor places, I am amazed at the hospitality and kindness of those people. That is sure 'above' other nations, way above Germany.

We need to define the terms 'superior' and 'above'

 

I think we are the best when **** needs to be done.

What i believe is the best on us, is that we believe we can achieve anything and trust alot in science and engineering.

We have lots of courage. What we lack is mercy and compassion. Even when we help someone.

And we sometimes overplan stuff.

 

Japs were flying on a wooden aircraft - like Russians. And the US spent four years to defeat them.

As for allied landing in Sicily and the battle of Kursk - it's laughable. Germand had about 3000 tanks and 1 million soldiers in Kursk, while in Sicily the main Axis force was Italy, and in total Italians and a few of Germans had about 150 tanks and 200 thousand people. The main goal of operation in Sicily was to secure navigation in the Mediterranian Sea for Allies, it has nothing to do with battle of Kursk.

 

Only 1/4 of Romanians have blue eyes.
They have the largest percentage of green eyes related to population.
The majority of them has brown eyes.

You can find all eye colors in Romania, including the most rare ones: hazel, pale yellow and even grey.

The is a sharp contrast in skin paleness the minute you cross the Danube( south they are not pale mostly because of the mixture with the ottomans, that is not the case for Romanians- but Romanians have mixed with gypsies as they have the largest percentage of them related to pop, some 5%, but the number has dropped since they emigrated west).

They are really very diverse. My wife is 'pure' romanian(whatever that means--at least 5 generations). She is a blonde, freckles and blue eyes. I have some German ancestry but she is 'whiter' than me, if you associate white with blondes and not typical Caucasian.

 

Not laughable.....Italy was like the second front....DDay,France the third, along with Allied bombings of Germany. Most moskali campaigns corresponded somewhat with the western fronts.

Uh yeah, Japs occupied a lot of islands in the Pacific....most of which needed amphibious landings that required tons of foreplanning.

Eastern Front was one big land battle....where the vatniks just threw bodies at the Germans. Soviet generals had the luxury of that, plus the to ns o lend lease.

US fought and was involved in 3 theaters....desert, Pacific, European.....where the Russkis just dealt with the Germans.

 

And we dealt with all those shitheads (US, Russkies, French and whatever else crawled out) and did very well considering the circumstances.

 

Well....yeah, German infantry (Wehrmacht), Fallschirmjagers, tank crews were in a league of their own.

Their mistake was....was to fight a two front war with the US. Should've just focused on the Russkis.

 

No, we just had to wait 5 years and then nuke the **** out of USA and Russia. Germany was leading in that aspect and would have had the bomb first.

I think a nuke to New York and one to Moscow would have been enough.

 

Germany is powerful in Europe.

Germany is not powerful compared to the United States.

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Germany/United-States/Military

And private wealth isnt even close.

https://mises.org/wire/if-sweden-and-germany-became-us-states-they-would-be-among-poorest-states

 

It wasnt a terrorist attack, it was an assassination.

Who invaded first?

 

We rule Europe unrivalled.

You cant imagine how funny it is, when Greece blames us for WW II and we simply switch off their pensions and let their pensioners starve.

It took not even a week before they agreed to all our demands.

 

That's an awful lot of big talk. If we could have got the bombs ready to go three months earlier, Germany would have made for a nice parking lot. NOT ONE PENNY of U.S. Taxpayers money should have been spent rebuilding such an ungrateful, shithole of a country...that has been the cause of 2 world wars.

I can just imagine the arrogant Krauts lined up outside Stalingrad talking about how they would defeat the Russians in no time at all. After that ass whooping, then the Krauts tried again in Kursk...after they had been run out of Voronezh and other neighboring cities in Russia....only to take another quick ass whooping that followed them all the way back to sour kraut central, Berlin.

The Russians and other good guys should have pulled back out of Berlin and nuked that city into permanent extinction.

 

The Germans were outnumbered 1 to 10 by the Soviets in the Russian theater. Stalin enlisted millions of Russian soldiers to win the war. He had some 5 million men available immediately and a total of 23,000 tanks. The Germans had no satisfactory long-term plan for the invasion. Hitler wrongly had assumed that 'We have only to kick in the front door and the whole rotten edifice will come tumbling down'. Probably the Nazi Empire in Europe would have survived, if he had not attacked the Soviet Union. The D-Day invasions further weakened Nazi Germany which was forced to fight a two-front war.