Sandy Hoax: Where is the proof?

This is why the republican party and the conservatives in general are scorned, ridiculed, marginalized and laughed at.

- - - Updated - - -

Not to mention
How many people would it take to pull this off and how do 'they' keep them quite?

 

I think that some of the people who spearhead these conspiracy theory are like modern day P.T Barnum s.
"There's a sucker born every minute"

 

Have the teachers of those kids sent out notices as to why they haven' been showing up to school. Are there missing persons reports from the parents? And if not, why haven't the police inquired of the whereabouts of the children. And , am I really responding to this OT?

 

Be careful what you wish for..

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/15/gene-rosen-sandy-hook-conspiracy-theory_n_2481912.html

Gene Rosen, Sandy Hook Hero, Harassed By Conspiracy Theorists Who Claim He's An Actor

...

These CTs are sub-human. Their mental wiring is loose.. And they end up causing grief to others because they can't comprehend what they're doing. They have more in common with Adam Lanza than with the victims..

 

Simply explain why there were no injuries.I mean,not a single kid or parent
went to the hospital.Over 100 rounds and no one person escaped with
am injury.Explain how that is possible.Wouldn't that be the Only Mass
shooting in history were there were no Injured,just deaths.
Initially it was reported that there was only One adult Injured.A week
later it was stated that there were 2 adult survivors.C'mon.That's
as sloopy as it gets.
Just like the video showing the Bushmaster being taken from the back
of a vehicle,which was used by Adam Lanza.
Why was the Medical Examiner acting downright goofy.
Why did he refuse to give the calibre of bullet when asked.
He gave some flimsly excuse about getting kidded by experts whenever
discussing bullet caliber.Not credible.He was shilling.
Why was Obama smiling a huge smile when he had his picture taken
with the one family.The Pic where a supposed little girl is seen,
who was said to be a victim,wearing the same dress as the morning of the
shooting.They're all smiling huge smiles.Not credible.Was that photo
taken way before the day of the shooting.

 

Would it help you if I played the "Jeopardy!" theme song?

 

A Pastor { Jim Solomon } Told ABC News Laura Spencer :
" She was the first student who ran out of the Sandy Hook school.
Six and a half years old.She ran out of the school building covered in blood
from head to toe. "
Reporter Laura Spencer said before her Interview with the pastor,
" Of 16 kids in this classroom, one survived."

Now I have something to go on.
This means that Lanza killed just 4 other kids in all the school.
And that the little 6 year old first grader,the lone survivor ,was THE FIRST
student who ran out.
Now we're getting somewhere.Where were the other students of the school.
Am I to believe No kid ran out of the school after hearing shots fired.
Over 100 rounds is an awfull lot of Noise.Would take probably 5 minutes
minimum.There is No physical proof as to what ensued during and after the
shooting.No closed circuit TV like in a Wal*Mart parking lot.
There were witnesses.But I think they probably have been rounded up
like in the Colorado Theatre shooting and instructed to NOT give any
details out at all.
The interview of the Pastor is up on ABC as a video - Sandy Hook Classroom
Survivor Played Dead -.
The strange thing is what else the Pastor recalls the little 6 yr.old
saying after being the first student out of the school.
" The first thing she said to her mommy was ' Mommy,I'm OK
but all my friends are dead. " Supposedly still covered in blood.
How did the Mommy get to the school so quick.Why wasn't the girl immediately taken
to an ambulance.Why did the little girl say that.How could she have known
ALL her friends were dead.Very odd.The child should have been trembling in
shock.The Pastor in the video was smiling as if proud of the little girl
and when asked by Spencer " What did she tell her mom.What did she see
in there ". The Pastor explained " Well she saw someone who she felt was
Angry and someone who she felt was very Mad. "

 

Apparently not.

 

They have to exist first.

You've proven nothing.

 

I've not set out to "prove" anything.. I'm simply asking questions.

So the Batman massacre, the Columbine shooting, the DC sniper attacks.. Are you saying those shooting don't exist? None of those actually happened?

Are you saying the funerals didn't exist? They never happened? No funerals related to the SH shooting happened?

And you're saying that all those names are fictitious, and the people don't exist? Whose pictures are they then?

 

That's exactly what he and other people who share his "views" are saying, though they don't have any proof that isn't a dolled up version of "it COULD happen therefore it did" even though we know, without a doubt, that it didn't. Simply the possibility existing for something to potentially happen is enough for them to conclude that it DID happen. By their logic, I was the one who robbed my local bank a couple years ago, simply because I could have. Of course, that means everyone else who "could" have did too, so that's why they normally insert their boogeyman of choice as the perpetrator in these theories.

 

I forgot who it was, but someone on the thread claimed that they aren't convinced this tragedy happened by grieving people and their statements saying they lost a child.

But they said that there were two nuns there before the attack, because someone called the Alex Jones show and relayed it saying someone else saw it, as second hand information, and therefore that would be true.

Confirmation bias affects everybody, but some more than others.

 

X2! This OT should be examined to see if it was actually typed and posted on the forum. I'm not sure I believe it was actually typed and put on here for everyone to read. It could be a conspiracy. Just when you think you've stuffed all the nuts you can put into one bag, you find you can put one more. Thank goodness for bags.

 

Where's the video footage? I have yet to see the video footage of this message being typed by a human.

 

Another great point! I'm thinking conspiracy for sure now.

 

If the media wanted to, they could flood their servers and cameras with all of the bad stories that take place within America, or within the world... to an extent. I mean, the media is saturated with a lot already, but they could hone in on every gun-related death that would further their cause. Prying open the mess that is Chicago, a place that had more deaths than Afghanistan... it would be an effective propaganda campaign. But, large scale attacks serve the purpose, I suppose, much quicker and to a greater extent, like in this particular case, since it involved (so many) children. They could come to the same conclusion using each individual story that arises during the year though, since IIRC, some 10,000+ Americans die every year from guns. That's a lot of "spin" that can be spun.

 

1)We don't know exactly why this alleged massacre occurred at this point as the details of the forensic investigation have not been revealed. One thing is certain and that is that police procedures at a major crime scene such as this were evidently not followed. Now they are talking about destroying the crime scene altogether. That seems strange, to say the least. When will the official autopsy reports and photos be released to members of the news media as is customary in high profile crimes such as this?

2)Who knows? It is my understanding that no one has seen the dead children as all were closed casket funerals.

3)I have not seen any in depth investigations as to exactly who these people were, or if they ever really existed in the first place. Generally in a high profile case like this, the buzzards from the press would be in a frenzy trying to get stories from anyone related to or close to any of these alleged victims.

 

After doing, admittingly brief, research I have found no basis that autopsy reports and photos are "customary" in any crime. In some situations they are released during trials, which then becomes public record. In cases such as these the information does not need to released, and there is no reason why those families should have to go through seeing the slain photos of their beautiful children strewn across the internet all because some nutters think it was fake. Your incredulity is no reason to put people through that.

Wrong. Says right in there that the child was in an open casket. For the record, that took me 23 seconds to locate the correct information. Do you do any research at all? If so, when? Why would we take your word for anything when you don't provide sources? How can we believe what you say when I found factual information that refutes your assertion in less time than it takes to brew a pot of coffee?

Well, I think it's become apparent as to the amount of research you do or have done into the depth of the investigations. At this point in time it is apparent that you do not do research and take your knowledge from CTist sites.