SD GOP Senate hopeful...child abuse, grooming, raping female member

This desperate mischaracterization of a well sourced article by a legitimate organization clearly stating well researched facts is to be expected from a hyper partisan in denial. As said before and worthy of repeating, since you are vastly unable to counter, the link lists the majority of perps and deviants to be more on the RW side of the aisle; you just can't accept this nor debunk this. Now, what you should ask yourself is why those that whine about deviants and groomers seem to be in the same RW party?

 

And when I stated by name you made no objection and tried to bolster it by fallacious arguing most vote Republican.

 

Not at all it does not even pretend to prove what you claim.

 

Not when I responded about the Pope and you did not protest even then claiming most Catholics vote Republican further proving it is Reps not Dems who abuse children and rape women which I show was a totally baseless and fallacious claim.

 

Then stop claiming it is one proving you baseless assertion.

 

So because I didn’t protest you moving the goal posts that means I was insinuating it was the Catholic Church?

I said religious organizations — the bulk of religious persons in the nation are Republican.

 

Yet you have no link or stats to support this^ much desired deflection from reality.

The stats posted in the post I commented on trash any opine of yours since the statistics are fact. So, the link is compiled of actual statistical references. The link lists the majority of perps and deviants to be on the RW side of the aisle; you just can't accept this nor counter this. Now, what you should ask yourself is why those that whine about deviants and groomers seem to be in the same RW party?

 

It's YOUR claim that you cannot muster anything to prove it. The list was created to specifically cite one side it is NOT a survey or a study of which side is the leader.

 

This is the worst kind of desperate deflection and totally ignored that the post I quote clearly sourced a link with multiple GOP perverts far outnumbering any other party. As I said before if you are unable to counter thatn facts and stats in that link but are just partisan denying, then your bias is beyond discourse as the facts can't be countered by simple rhetoric. Do better or disprove the link and the sourced information. Bottom line? You simply can't and that's though when the perps are the loudest whiners about groomers.

 

And we know which religious organization has had the scandal the last ten years and when I specifically cited the Catholic church you didn't object but made a fallacious assertion trying to bolster your claim tying it to Republicans which I quickly refuted. Give it up. You haven't proven Reps engage such acts more than Dems.

"Of the 1050 victims in our sample, 404 had been in Roman Catholic, 130 in Protestant, and 516 in non-religious institutions. The overall mean age at the time of reporting was 52.2 years. Males (59.8%) outnumbered females. Victims who had been in religiously affiliated institutions were significantly older than those who had been in secular institutions. Almost half the victims had been abused physically as well as sexually, and most victims reported that the abuse had occurred repeatedly and that the assaults had been committed by males. Patterns of abuse (time, type, and extent), and the gender of the offenders did not differ between the three groups. Intercourse was more frequently reported by older victims and by females. Similar percentages of victims in all groups reported current psychiatric diagnoses (depression, anxiety disorders, PTSD). Significantly more victims from Protestant institutions reported having current psychosocial problems.

Conclusion
The results suggest that child sexual abuse in institutions is attributable to the nature of institutional structures and to societal assumptions about the rights of children more than to the attitudes towards sexuality of a specific religion. The exploratory data arising from this study may serve as a starting point for building hypotheses, and may point the way toward improvements in prevention and intervention strategies."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3995507/

 

you are basically stating that this is a religious organization issue, which is what I have said.

Looking at the funding of all religious institutions across the United States, do you believe the majority of donors are liberal or conservative?