Seminole clerk: I'm gonna unseal settlement with Trayvon Martin's parents

But the libs argue he was just a child and not capable of the accused attack. It does not even matter the trajectory of the bullet or the witness' who describe Trayvon beating George with his fists that aren't weapons.

 

If the forensics show Martin was on top of Zimmerman, preventing his escape, GZ will be acquitted. The thug supporters know that and want to get their licks in before, because they will be like ghosts when GZ is acquitted.

 

Not if the dirt bag had already pulled his gun. You are never obligated to let an apparent felon go free with the weapon still in his hands. It gives him the opportunity to kill you.

There is no way fat boy could have gotten his weapon out while Martin was on top of him, so I am more easily correct in assuming he had it out already when Martin got on top.

- - - Updated - - -

Considering that Z was acting like a boy bumper, Martin would have been justified in stomping a hole in his chest,.

 

you just pulled that out of your butt. You have no basis for that comment, other than the word of a sociopathic failure of a human being who admits acting like a boy bumper that Martin sucker punched him.

 

There is no evidence that martin punched the pathetic failure at all. The trajectory does matter, and it is going to hurt fat boy. There is no way you get that kind of trajectory on someone who is smothering you.

 

It was so close Tray had stippling on the skin. Wanna refute that?

 

Why argue with folks that wouldn't know one end of a gun from the other? Give him/her a gun and we'd never hear from him/her again on the forum as he/she would have shot him/herself to death.

 

Okay, once again you showed your true color! What a "legal genius" you proved to be!

So. . .you are telling us without any shame that you would have shot a kid in the back for "jumping on and over the hood of your ILLEGALLY parked car (I figure that blocking a sidewalk is not a "legal" thing to do, right?" and costing you $500 in deductible?

And you are calling yourself a "Christian?"

And you are calling yourself "pro-life?"

Yet, you believe that the life of a kid is worth LESS than $500?

Guess who I find to be the most "rotten" in the little scenario you just offered us. . . ? I give you one clue . . .it is not the kid who jumped on and over your car!

 

"but that would not be a valid shoot and I'd be arrested"

Try reading it helps.

 

DUH!

Even if the gun had been right on Martin's skin (which it wasn't!), it would have been too close to leave enough room for Zimmerman's forearm, hand, and the gun IF Martin had REALLY Been laying on top of Zimmerman pinning him down (horizontal over Zimmerman, as stated by witness 2!).

So, even that proves that Zimmerman was lying about being "pinned down" at the time he shot the kid!

Can you add 18 inches (the average length of a forearm) and 4 inches (the average length of a hand and wrist holding a gun), and 4 inches (the average part of the gun protruding from the hand that holds it)?

What does that give you. .and then add to that the 4+ inches (minimum) between gun and the hole in Martin's chest. . .and tell me how Martin could have been "hovering" horizontally 30 inches away from Zimmerman's fat stomach when Zimmerman AIMED and shot the bullet in a DIRECT, front to back trajectory, with NO ANGLE. . .while "struggling" with Martin?

I can't wait to see how the defense gets around that lie during trial!

 

I said it was not a valid shoot. But let me tell you about those rotten kids in that LA neighborhood. I saw one kid with a tear tattoo -- that means he has one homocide to his name. In the time I was in LA, in the space of three months, there were three deaths in front of my office. One was a homeless man who expired in the night on a bed of trash. The other two were drive-by shootings, kids killing other kids. Those kids will kill over a pair of Nike shoes, and have. They have no concept of the value of human life. If I shot that kid who trashed my car, I'd be doing the world a favor. My guess is he's dead now, shot by some other kid.

 

Oh. . .I read that!

In fact, this is probably the most disgusting part of that comment!

He knows enough (as a legal "wizard!") to know that you can't shoot a kid in the back for making a bump on his car. . .but the ONLY thing that stopped him from shooting the kid (except for the fact that, thank God. . .he was not carrying!) was that he would have been arrested!

Not even a thought for the life he would have taken, or for the family of the kid he would have killed. . .not even for what his "GOD" would have thought of his "priorities!"
And, obviously, with that kind of "moral," you support allheartedly what Blackrook stated, and what a the poster child for "hero syndrome" did. . .because YOU would have done the same. . .without even a hit on the nose? Is that it?

Yep. . .there is nothing more to say. . .you said it all!

 

If I was Zimmerman I would use my free time to plan my civil case against the Martin family so once he walks he can get the ball rolling before all the money is gone .

 

Keep making (*)(*)(*)(*) up Sadine. Your trolling tactics are getting old there is plenty of room on ignore for you as well.

 

Sick!

What makes you better than the killers in LA?

You are stating that your intentions (if it didn't cost you your own "comfort" and liberty) would be to KILL also!

So. .. what makes you better than them? The fact that you don't have tatoos?

- - - Updated - - -

Keep on dreaming!

By the way. . .if the Martin were as "entitled" as the Zimmerman's. . .$1 million would be gone by the end of the trial!

 

Please put me on ignore!

But. . .I wasn't the one making such a disgusting comments, proudly stating that "if I had a gun, and if it wasn't illegal, I would have shot a kid in the back for costing me $500 in deductible!

I am merely pointing out that EVERYONE in this forum is not so disgustingly racist and immoral as to compare the life of a kid and a bump in a dumb automobile parked illegally!

 

Another good question is should george spend the money for a high profile civil lawyer or go cheap ....he has alot of decisions ahead once this mess is over .

 

Yeah, there will be plenty of racial extortion money when this is over. Crump is sueing everyone he can just like I said he would....

 

I didnt make the comments either.... CAnt you (*)(*)(*)(*)ing read? I just pointed out part of his posts and you went on your little rant about YOU support this and YOU this and YOU that. (*)(*)(*)(*) off with your fake outrage.

 

Sadanie, any kid who would casually and without thinking do thousands of dollars of damage to my car deserves death, but is illegal to shoot people in the back while they're running away and I accept that law, though I may not always agree with it.

 

And I didn't say YOU made that comment!

But you sure were defending such a disgusting comment! This is why I asked you if you approved. . .if you too would have given LESS than $500 for the life of a kid!

And if you think that my outrage is fake. . .that just show how little you know about people!

 

He probably could hire a second year law student for those easy pickins'....

- - - Updated - - -

Teens commit all kinds of crimes these days. They should be held accountable or at least the parents should be sued.

 

You can't sue a parent for the civil or criminal wrongs of a minor, unless the parent was negligent in some way.

 

NO ONE deserves death for any MATERIAL damage done to anything!

I believe that if you understood that, you might have a better chance to find a job in the legal system again! Have you or have you not study law?

Can you tell me what law condemns ANYONE to death for "material" damage only?

Go ahead. . .give me the code!

Sick!

And more you post. . .and deeper you dig your hole! Ask your priest, or your pastor if your statement is even moral! Ask ANY attorney if any court of law would condemn a person (much less a kid) to DEATH (from back or front. . .doesn't matter!) for making "thousands of dollars of damage to a car!"

Where did you go to law school? In China?

 

So. . .you know that much, and your solution to that is to "shoot the kid in the back?"

You know what.. .I think you've said enough tonight. . .I would cut my loss an take a rest for a hour or so if I were you!

And next time. . .why don't you try to park your car some place else than the sidewalk!