That makes sense when it comes to the origin of Life but doesn't sit too well for 9/11. The fact remains we still don't know who funded it.
Sure it does.. unless we can see the 28 redacted pages that Bush has hidden. Years ago I had a problem at work..I knew something was wrong, but not exactly what... I had bits of the puzzle but not all.. six years later the answers showed up.. and the perp went to jail for 29 years. So, sometimes you have to live with NOT having all the answers... but the 28 redacted pages might help.
If it turns out those pages show the funding came from Saudi then it was not done by al qaeda. Hell, the term al qaeda itself is a Western born myth.
Wrong yet again. They clearly state Al Qaeda funded the 9/11 attacks. YOUR lameassed ASSumption is that if they don't know for certain where the exact funds came from for Al Qaeda. Funny how truthers can be so ignorant as to try and claim Al Qaeda doesn't exist. Does that also mean Osama doesn't exist? KSM? Moussaoui? Are we killing ghosts? Just how deep do your delusions go?
I would be very surprised if the funding came from Arabia, but I would like to know.. I suspect it came from Pakistan or even from Yemen.. Listen to the Arabs on this board.. They HATE the Saudis, Qataris and Kuwaitis.. and the Emirates because of their prosperity and stability.... Back in the day when Egypt was flirting with communism and the Soviets, Radio Cairo was broadcasting daily that the Al Saud were really Jews.
It is not an assumption they don't know where the funding came from because the Final Report clearly stated the origin of the funds are unknown. But do keep up your dishonest responses....... (btw.....the all caps on the first three letters of "assumption" is awesome!!! It really helps boost your argument.....I mean outright dishonesty)
Way to restate your lie without addressing what I wrote. You continue to prove your complete lack of worth to the TBM. Nobody is saying the 9/11 commission doesn't know the specific sources that funded Al Qaeda. YOUR claim that the 9/11 commission is claiming Al Qaeda didn't fund 9/11 is an outright lie as has been shown to you. Now run along and make another snide, meaningless remark.
WHAT?!?!? That is HYSTERICAL!!!!!! If 9/11 was a false flag, the government wouldn't bring in a whole different government to fund it! BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard a truther utter and I have heard some whoppers before!!!! Do I really need to clarify for you why that is the stupidest thing any truther has ever said or do you understand the magnitude of the stupidity of your claim?
The Final Report states the origin of the funds are unknown so it is impossible to also claim al qaeda provided the funding. I never said the Commission claimed al qaeda didn't fund it. I said the Commission concluded the origin of the funds are unknown. Your dishonesty has worn thin.
I never said it was the Saudi government.....I said from Saudi.... The only thing hysterical is your inability to read and comprehend simple posts.
That is the same old debunked crap that I was talking about. Notice the date? Have you read CNN's retraction on the story and how they should have vetted it better? The FBI did indeed interview Waleed A. Al Shehri and proved he was not the same guy they listed as the muscle on flight 11, not the pilot. The real Waleed M. Al Shehri. Terrorist thug The real Waleed A. Al Shehri. Pilot
Way to backpedal, but that doesn't change a single thing. WHY would the government need any funding at ALL?!? It would just massively complicate things and leave numerous people open to blackmail. Still an epic failure on your part even if you are too blind to see it.
You DO know when you say 'from saudi' you as much mean from the Saudi government?.....YOU need to be more clear when you write, instead of getting nasty,and blaming others for poor reading skills..
Only an idiot would assume I was talking about the Saudi government. If you assume the "government" when I say Saudi then that is your own stupidity.
Wrong yet again. You were wrong the first three times and you're wrong this time as well. Let me clarify for you. The 9/11 commission could not verify where Al Qaeda got the specific funds to fund 9/11. That is NOT the same as saying Al Qaeda never got funded. Thus you made a completely retarded claim when you claim that because they don't know where Al Qaeda got the funds that Al Qaeda could not have funded 9/11. Your claim is so (*)(*)(*)(*)ing stupid that it is hard to believe even a truther could make it. You are claiming the commission can't make that claim. That is wrong. You know it. I know it. Yet here you are waffling about semantics. Typical truther. If you get caught in lies, act dumb.
So when you put words in my mouth you simply pile on more false accusations instead of being honest and admitting you put words in my mouth. How can you not be embarrassed?
I never said al qaeda "could not have funded it." It's pathetic the only way you can respond is by putting words in my mouth.
Let me remind you of your own words. The Final Report states the origin of the funds are unknown so it is impossible to also claim al qaeda provided the funding.
When one talks about governments, it gets implied. I accepted the fact you didn't mean the Saudi government and addressed the fact your ASSumption was completely retarded no matter how you wanted to pretend the funding got there. The government did not need nor would it want outside funding by ANYONE, much less foreign nationals. Address the stupidity of your statement instead of making it all about me.
I firmly believe some of those redacted pages contain the words Pakistani ISI within them. It was politically expedient to keep the names of some of our erstwhile "allies" out of the mix. Realpolitik didn't die when the wall came down.
Your failure to comprehend simple posts is amazing because my statement concerns the present tense. Until they find the origins of the funding you can't claim al qaeda did it, or Santa Claus, or gumbo.
Once again, when you are flat out wrong all you do is give a sad response. Your inability to see the significance of an issue is not anyone else's fault.
AAAAAAND there goes SS with his tail between his legs once again. Anyone surprised? Anyone? Anyone? You can't even address the retarded post you made after I already corrected myself. They you have to lie about THAT!
Tail between legs? Let's look at some common sense: You can't claim al qaeda funded 9/11 when the Commission concluded the origin of the funds are unknown. You would have to be some type of specially mentally challenged superstar to claim: "we know who funded it even though the origin of the funds are unknown!" This mean whoever funded 9/11 is unknown and free to fund more attacks. I am sure you have contacted your respective representatives to pressure them to find out who did the funding. Oh wait, you think you know who funded it even though the Final Report concluded the origin of the funds are UNKNOWN.
