A few words on Kinsey, the father of the sexual revolution, and today's sex ed programs: "The Judeo-Christian worldview was expunged from the classroom. ...The only avenue remaining for the teaching of human reproduction was the "scientific," i.e., Kinseyan, secular worldview. By 1968 over 51,000 sex professionals had been trained by the unaccredited IASHS (Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality) to teach Kinseyan sexuality in schools and medical schools and to design school sex education curricula. In 1975, the IASHS began to accredit sex educators in "safe sex" through the Ph.D. level. "Contraception became a necessity in the face of the radical changes in the sexual landscape and so it was legalized in 1965.[6] As evidence of lack of "consent" became the only criteria for sex crimes, alleged rape victims were commonly challenged as "liking" the rough sex and as consenting to the sexual activity. Prostitution and rape were increasingly referred to as "victimless crimes" in the courts and in the media. Thus, the right to have sex for 'fun' and profit became the justification for a sex industry, inaugurated by Kinsey's publicist, Hugh Hefner, that includes child and adult pornography, exhibitionism, prostitution and strip clubs, to name a few." "By 1981 Dr. Mary Calderone, SIECUS president and past medical director of Planned Parenthood, took Kinsey one step further, asserting that children are sexual in the womb (Kinsey said children were sexual from birth). Calderone announced that awareness of childhood sexuality was a primary goal of her organization. This set the "scientific" standard for distributing condoms to children nationwide. Therapeutic interventions were instituted to aid the now increasingly traumatized youth. Pharmocological intervention also increased, including mandated Hepatitis B vaccines for infants and HPV vaccines for elementary age children as STD "protections," both of which were advocated in a 1977 "Child Rights" pedophile manifesto." http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2011/08/sexual_anarchy.html
We were teaching a particular religious view in our public schools??? Odd...I thought that went against a certain Amendment to the Constitution that said something about "respecting an establishment of religion"??? BTW, given this is Yet Another Social Con Complaint post....you're not actually going to suggest re-criminalizing contraception....you just want to complain about it being legalized, right?
Again, the insistence that if the government doesn't sanction something, it must not happen. Judeo-Christian WORLDVIEW is not the same as "Baptist" or "Jewish". I suggest you get a dictionary. Did I suggest criminalization of contraception? Nope, I didn't. What I meant, was what I said..which is that the current system that includes sex ed in the schools, the de-criminalization of sex crimes (raping a child used to be a capitol offense...no more! Kids like sex!) and the belief that there's no such thing as "deviant" sex, comes directly from fraudulent studies, funded and broadcast by the porn industry. I know that's a complex thought. I'll give you a minute to process it.
1. It excludes Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc. So if we were teaching a "Judeo-Christian worldview" in our schools....that violates the First Amendment's "establishment clause." 2. The article YOU posted noted the legalization of contraception and spoke of it in a pejorative sense. So now you disagree with your own citation?!?!? 3. Please list everything you consider to be "deviant sex"....so we know what it is to you.
Having sex with children. Sexually abusing children in the name of *science*. Rape. Offenders now receive much lighter sentences than they used to, thanks to Kinsey, the porn industry, and those who support his fraudulent body of work. People like you. So let me ask YOU a question...do you consider Kinsey's studies *scientific*? Strapping babies to boards and sexually assaulting them, then recording the results? Having your employess have sex in an upstairs room while you watch and "record" the "study"? How do you feel about the fact that our sex ed program comes directly from these studies, applied?
So you are saying there wouldn't be sex crimes if it wasn't for the scientific approach Kinsey took to identify the sexual tendencies of the human being? Cuz I'm pretty sure all those things happened throughout the history of mankind. http://www.indiana.edu/~kinsey/about/controversy2.html Below is a reiteration of some of the accusations against Kinsey and his research from Dr. Reisman and others, and the Institute's response:
The instititute of COURSE defends him. If it wasn't for him and the porn $$, they wouldn't exist. They also refuse to release his records for review.
Incidentally, children who have suffered sex abuse also protect the people who harm them. Go figure. These folks aren't children though. They protect him because they know he was a monster, and they know his studies were completely discredited. Even he knew it...he died depressed and humiliated.
1. It excludes Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc. So if we were teaching a "Judeo-Christian worldview" in our schools....that violates the First Amendment's "establishment clause." Minutia. In other words, meh, off topic. ------It was mentioned in YOUR post...how can it be "off topic"? 2. The article YOU posted noted the legalization of contraception and spoke of it in a pejorative sense. So now you disagree with your own citation?!?!? Nope. I agree with my citation, which listed the laws that were changed based on Kinsey's *studies*, which consisted of auditing rapos, child molesters, a Nazi war criminal, and others...and presenting those findings as the "norm" of human sexuality. ----So you think contraception legalization was based on links to child molestation and Nazism....but DON'T want contraception made illegal again?!?!?!? So you endorse something brought about by those evils?!?!? 3. Please list everything you consider to be "deviant sex"....so we know what it is to you. ---Okay so the ONLY things you consider "deviant sex" are ....pedophilia, rape, and teaching sex education in schools (I assume that's your reference to "sexually abusing children in the name of science")? And that's it?
All the records are available, so there is no truth to your accusations. Someone has convinced you to believe a bunch of baloney. If he died depressed and humiliated it was probably due to the false assumptions and ignorant accusations made towards him and his life's studies.
Kinsey was gay. Not saying that had any effect on his studies. His grad school work on "edible wild foods" was outstanding.
It's not baloney. Indiana U refuses to release Kinsey's records based on their insistence that researchers work is "confidential".... "Although the Kinsey Institute claims the research strategies never involved paying pedophiles, Esther is now asking for a congressional investigation of the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University. Until now, The Kinsey Institute has not provided any disclosure of the research records compiled during this time. However, Table 34 in Kinsey’s book, “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male,” published in 1948, lists the number of orgasms of children, some as young as two, performed within a 24-hour period. Table 34 was the subject of the documentary, “The Children of Table 34.” http://www.themoralliberal.com/2010/10/25/child-victim-of-kinsey-“sex-research”-tells-story-of-rape/
Do you know what Table 34 is? It's a table of the results of intense, long-term, ongoing sexual torture of children and infants, passed off as "science": "Table 34 set the stage for what has become dogma in the sex world: All humans are sexual from birth, and since children are sexual, they should be expected to behave sexually. Does this mean that children should be able to have sex with adults? Kinsey didn't say, but he wrote that the psychic damage to children who have sex with adults comes from the horrified reaction of adults, not from the sex itself. That opinion, a very large bone tossed to advocates of adult-child sex, has become a mantra in the sex world. Some who promote the mantra are sincere--a show of horror by parents of an abused child may indeed make matters worse. But many are advocates of adult-child sex hiding behind a pro-child argument. In my Time days, the air was so thick with sex-world arguments in favor of incest and adult-child sex that I threw a lot of them together in a one-page report. The list included a defense of incest by Wardell Pomeroy, a coauthor of the Kinsey reports. " http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/articles/041122/22john.htm
Kinsey did not experiment on babies, but he did spend time with pedophiles asking his usual set of leading questions that produced answers that said that babies enjoyed sex by the sound they made when being (*)(*)(*)(*)ed by adult men. They can whitewash that all they want but it is sick. His hypothesis was sick. He was not an objective observer, his questions where not objective. Anyone can read his poor protocol, his questionnaires, his methodology, and how he determined his outcomes. I have no problem with believing that there is such a thing as bisexuality (although many of my gay friends do not), but his approach is so unscientific and if he had not an established foundation that must perpetuate he would be there along with Freud and everyone wanting to (*)(*)(*)(*) their mother. It's just bad science in general, so there is no need to hyper-inflate what he did with lies and suggestions. Read the protocols. Utter crap.
Actually, we don't know if he experimented on babies or not, because the university won't release his work product. And there are people who have come forward to state that he very definitely DID pay people to sexually abuse children, so he could watch/record.
