Should we allow Russia to decide who is elected president as the right wants?

Th right will except Russia selecting who our president will be, as long as it is one of theirs¨ describe the difference between selecting and picking

 

Get a fricken life. The statement is Abott the right being a center of hate cruelty, homophobia, chauvinism and being inherently evil and that they are so scummy that they would let Russia do anything they could to get their Candidate into the presidency and once that was achieved will lie nonstop to keep in power. All I'm saying is that your party is so full of low lives that you would allow anything illegal or bad as long as you gained. So is that clear enough for you.

 

you seem to be the only one spewing hatred here, but let me guess, it is justified

 

You're kidding right?

 

They don't seem to mind being pawns of a corrupt dictator

Odd

 

and how am I a pawn?

 

You're supporting the Putin picked candidate aren't you?

 

Blah, blah, blah, blah.
"I'll explain stupid to you, it's saying that it is no longer a lie if it isn't Perjury." Like I said you've dumbed "lie" down to practically no meaning.

 

Not a chance.

 

Rob get a life.

 

The most humor here is that these wingnut hate party supporters, believe everything Small hands the orange monster says but in fact he is the biggest liar in the history of the presidency. His first 100 days have been fantastic , take out his executive orders that don't in any way count and their mental case has done nothing/

 

Thought I had one unless you mean living in your La La Land.

 

The framers rightly feared the tyranny of a majority as they did the tyranny of a centralized government.

 

If there is one thing I would change in the constitution I would dump states rights. Because when party's like the hate party takes charge of a state. They will hang everything out to dry from dumping good education, taking away the safety net for the poor , dumping all regulations and of course just giving the savings to big business and the wealthy. I'd dump States rights in a second.

 

Except for the fact that the Progressive Socialist Left has colluded for 100 years with Marxist Communists to overthrow America. They deed was accomplished as most Americans perceived this with the election of Barack Hussein Obama II. Actually it turns out that the PSML has hindered all investigations into the PSML Democrats collusion. That's evidenced by the Honorable Elijah Cummings.

 

You Don't have a clue what Communism socialism or Marxist are. And I will prove it to everyone here so they understand what a blow.hard you are. Go to a Encyclopedia find out what the main tenants of Communism is and come back and with those main tenants show everyone why I or my president or my Democratic party is communist , by the way bring your source also. He has no clue, nobody from the hate party does , it's all Hate Hate Hate and name calling as in Communist, what a pile of ****.

 

States rights was the number one precept of the constitution. If you know better, go start a convention and write your own.

 

WE are still waiting hero.

 

Should we allow Beijing to decide who is elected president as the left wants?

 

Well the clown car just drove past again.

 

Na I'll just spend my time getting rid of it in our constitution. hell all you have to do is look at hate party run states and what a disaster they are for taking care of the needy, the sick and the old, add in the fact that they don't want to spend a dime on education. Proves my point. So I'll just continue to tell the truth often and loud. People will start to see all we have to do is just get them to look , it's that bad in hate party states . The money is needed to hand over to Big B and the wealthy/

 

Russia has never decided an American election, so the question MOOT. It is a nonsensical question. Like asking...should people eat blue tomatoes shaped like carrots? Or, should we allow kids to ride the cow that jumped over the moon? Or, should we eat meteorites with brown gravy? Or, should we pay more than one dollar for a tree which grows 20 dollar bills forever? Or, should we give faux liberals a million bucks a year for their mental disabilities? Or, should we breed a chicken that is a vegetable?

 

What a pile of crap, Russia did without a doubt try their damnedest to get Small hands elected. They added endless lies to The lies that came from the hate party about Clinton. If they got one person to change their vote , they have to be prosecuted with the tools we have to prosecute them. Trade blocks or what ever. Clinton got 2 million votes more then President scum bag. So how many more would Clinton needed to turn this around 180 degrees. Now tell me they didn't elect a president and what possible proof could you have when the investigation isn't even over yet. Your clown act is getting old.

 

Give it your best shot. I just don't think people should try to change the constitution for transient fantasies.

 

To emphasize the point, FDR was actually a tool of Marxian Communism as illustrated in the following:

New Deal - Toward a Soviet America
"The tone and tendency of liberalism...is to attack the institutions of the country under the name of reform and to make war on the manners and customs (and freedom) of the people under the pretext of progress." --Disraeli, "Speech in London"

FDR became the 32nd President of the United States. He had sent William Bullitt to the USSR even during the campaign to arrange its recognition while Stalin was killing 10 million Ukrainians. FDR imposed central planning through New Deal, a.k.a. Raw Deal, regulations and programs. His close advisor Douglas said "The present pseudo-planned economy leads relentlessly into the complete autocracy and tyranny of the Collectivist State." FDR broke every campaign promise he had made and the New Deal was exactly the opposite of what he had promised. FDR had promised "I propose to you that the government, big and little, be made solvent and that the example be set by the President of the United States and his cabinet...Stop the deficits! Stop the deficits!" FDR made a flat promise to "reduce the cost of government operations 25 percent" and called for a sound gold currency (!). Instead, Franklin Deficit Roosevelt engaged in an orgy of spending and implemented the first twelve planks of the Socialist Party platform, which in substance was the New Deal. In his first year he proposed spending 10 billion on 3 billion of revenues; from 1933 to 1936 government expenditures went up more than 83 percent. He closed all banks with no intention or thought of ever re-opening them (banks are not needed in Marxist economics). After two years the New Deal was such a failure through waste, mismanagement and outright graft that FDR had to introduce a "New New Deal." The ND has been called 'a study in economic confusion.' FDR undermined the Constitution with blank-check appropriations which allowed him to control spending and blank-check legislation which allowed him to set up agencies to pass laws and regulations.

~~~~~~~~~~~~​

THE CENTRAL FACT OF THE 20TH CENTURY IS THAT FDR AT YALTA DELIVERED 725 MILLION HUMAN BEINGS INTO COMMUNIST SLAVERY
To do so, FDR trashed the four freedoms, the Atlantic Charter, his promises and commitments to small democracies, his oath of office, the moral standing of the United States, and he created a perpetual cold war that bankrupted US. To understand the treason at Yalta, is to understand Roosevelt. All of his actions were bent in the same direction - dead left. He unceasingly promoted Communism at home and abroad to the full extent and possibility of his office. FDR was a hard-core Marxist as proved by his speeches - in his first inaugural he proposed 3 planks of the Communist Manifesto. In his first inaugural address, he proposed national land redistribution! Karl Marx explained his plan to destroy all constitutional government: "The surest way to overturn the social order is to debauch the currency." FDR carried that out with a vengeance by taking the US off the gold standard and confiscating all gold.
Through 3 declarations of National emergency - March 1933, September 9, 1939, and May 27, 1941, FDR usurped as much dictatorial power as Hitler had on paper. The first was codified in HR 1491, No. 1 and gave FDR the same powers as in war.
Source: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/fdr.html

~~~~~~~~~~~​

Barack Hussein Obama and the Triumph of Marxism | The ...
https://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3613
2008-10-27 Barack Hussein Obama and the Triumph of Marxism. ... Barack Hussein Obama represents the ... The presidential election campaign in the USA in 2008 between ... Barack Hussein Obama represents the triumph of cultural Marxism; or perhaps we should simply say Marxism. One generation after Ronald Reagan led the USA to "victory," a person with Marxist sympathies could be about to be elected President of the USA. When the Nazis were defeated they were seen as evil, as they should be. When the Communists were "defeated," they were not seen as evil; they are misguided individuals with good intentions, a bit like Santa Claus with a bad hair day.

~~~~~~~~~~~~​

Get Ready for the ‘Fundamental Transformation of Barack ...
http://canadafreepress.com/article/...mental-transformation-of-barack-hussein-obama
November 16, 2016 Get Ready for the ‘Fundamental Transformation of Barack Hussein Obama ... Get ready for the ‘Fundamental Transformation of Barack ... Marxists, of which Obama is ... Marxists will search out all ways to force themselves back on America and its people—no matter what. Because the takeover of Western Society is wired into their evil DNA