Should Women Who NEVER Want Children Remain Abstinent Forever?

LOL, OH how DRAmatic ! The "crushed rubble " !!! LOLOLOL...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
UH, her own sexual needs have to be satisfied , TOO.

I know it's called a penis...

I do? Please point out WHERE and WHEN I ever said I wondered why marriages don't seem to last ???


Marriage is not supposed to be a "job".... a married woman does not have a "job" that requires "satisfying husband"....

The only things marriage requires is what the married parties agree on..

What !!! What TF does abortion have to do with a woman 'satisfying her husband" ??? NOTHING.

 

If she feels she should have no obligation to do basic things like that for her husband, that's probably going to reflect in other areas of the marriage as well.
You really think such a marriage is going to last that long, if a spouse is only doing what makes THEM feel good?
No marriage means a woman will probably be having sex inside another relationship - a non-married one.
And of course she's going to say she needs an abortion then.

 

If the woman's going to play "trade me something for sex, otherwise you're not getting any", that marriage is probably not going to go well.


Plus your argument is overall ridiculous. First your argument is that a woman shouldn't have to have sex with her husband unless that's what she feels like, and then your argument implies that (after that marriage comes to a screeching end) she will need to have sex with other men, and then get abortions, because those relationships are not suitable to bring up children in.

Surely you can see this.

You're arguing that her not feeling like having sex in some situations, and then the complete opposite of that, feeling like having sex in other situations, necessitates her needing abortion. Your argument might be a lot more convincing if you just stuck to one or the other argument.

 

You do not know what it means to live.

 

Oh boooooo hoooo.

Yikes. Conservatives love to mock Liberals for putting emotions over feelings, but you guys are equally pathetic.

 

Uuuh ooooh. Are you sure God approves of such promiscuous jokes?

Only cringe conservatives do that. Us who appreciate life are also pro-divorce.

Yeah, way to go ridiculing individual rights by putting it in quotations. A proper woman has five kids by the time she hits 25 and never opens her mouth unless she is singing while doing the dishes, right?

 

Do you know the difference between consent and rape?

 

What TF are you going on about ???


That is the silliest most jumbled up claptrap I've seen from you and that saying something....


I'd LOVE to know where you got your degree in ""marriage""" ...

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
The only things marriage requires is what the married parties agree on..

That has nothing to do with the post of mine you quoted so why did you use my post?

NO, that's YOU Sci-Fy imagination making up things and claiming others said them...

Surely you can see that your attitude towards women mirrors the Taliban...

Nope, never said that....can you SHOW/PROVE I said that???

A need for sex has nothing to do with abortion...see, first one has to be pregnant THEN they can contemplate an abortion.....

Well I have one and you don't....YOUR confusion over what I post is all on you...

 

Should Women Who NEVER Want Children Remain Abstinent Forever?

An asinine premise that has gone on 18 pages? How silly.

 

They can have a tubal ligation and not get pregnant. They can take birth control pills which are HIGHLY effective. It they have some worry beyond that they take OTC morning after pills. At the same time require the man to wear a condom. You don't have to have intercourse to have sex.

I don't see a point here.

 

or she can have an abortion....but you are correct , there is no point here...

Should Women Who NEVER Want Children Remain Abstinent Forever?

An asinine premise that has gone on 18 pages? How silly.

 

She doesn't even have to go that far. Pregnancy is highly preventable these days.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
or she can have an abortion....but you are correct , there is no point here...

Should Women Who NEVER Want Children Remain Abstinent Forever?

An asinine premise that has gone on 18 pages? How silly.

But obviously not completely.....and so what if it was???

WHAT TF has that got to do with women's right to bodily autonomy?