For those lurking, here's some useful evidence showing the lies from officials about this whole "Flight 93 mostly buried" nonsense in Shanksville: Guess how many cars-worth of debris was 'buried' in Shanksville? Why no piles of plane debris, just piles of dirt? Memorial Ambassador: 'Over 90% of Flight 93 found, basically all from in the ground' Skeptic's dilemma regarding alleged Flight 93 wreckage The Boeing 757 Challenge! Let's see if the skeptics can counter any of this evidence without any ad-hom attacks, slander, or gossip. I doubt it. Any bets?
Practice what you preach truth-seeker. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/232824-prove-zero-united-93-buried.html
No photographic evidence...just third party hearsay. Not ONE photo of a plane coming out of a hole. Simple request. Impossible to answer I guess. No plane crashed in Shanksville...no proof....certainly none of it being buried. Why? THEY LIED. Never happened. Now let's wait for the spin masters to jump in and pretend there was evidence offered (hoping the reader will look no further for themselves....the "official" "spin" control. Right here....right now...show us ONE photo. Present ONE....please. Not words....PHOTOS. Just ONE.
You were presented with a photo. Let me remind you. You dismissed it, yet had no evidence to back up your dismissal. Would you like me to remind you of what I think of your opinion?
Apparently he is looking for a photo of the plane whole and intact with signs saying "Welcome to Shanksville!" with a date stamp on them of 9/11/01. Nothing less will do apparently.
Ok...so...this is your conclusive evidence, that correct? Try to refrain from the urge to hurl insults. Just stick to the subject at hand. Yes, that IS all of it??..OR..No, I have more?
Ahh...the ridicule. Awesome. No, I was looking for something more than one inconclusive photo with no reference to surroundings, or anything else verifiable. I can put a rusted chunk of overheated metal, throw it in a hole and call it Flight 93's "proof". I ask again....anything more?
ONE engine that could be an engine, from 93, or from a crash in Spain, France, or Gilligan's Island from 1977, 1981, 1967, or 1994. Any of the aforementioned.
Wrong yet again. That picture was submitted as evidence on a court of law which means it has a chain of custody of who all has had the picture since it was taken along with a statement by the person taking the photograph of where it was taken and when. It would help if you knew the judicial system along with what constitutes evidence. I would say then you wouldn't make such a fool of yourself, but you seem to always prove people wrong when they say that.
Well, it's tough to create multiple photos apparently...however..ONE, well, with photoshop and a real tight close up shot, not so tough I guess.
That is all you asked for. But let's face it. Your mind is made up. NOTHING, including God himself coming down, taking you by the hand and explaining it all to you in itty bitty words, is going to convince you otherwise. You've already shown the maturity level you handle all the other evidence, so what is the point? Some people are just too (*)(*)(*)(*) ignorant to know the truth no matter how well it is laid out in front of them. This is the trademark of the typical truther. Deny and and all evidence that goes against what you believe and hold up as gospel any evidence that might make your point. Suede's little debacle with the Mossad proved that extremely well.
I do know that it proves that more than ZERO percent of United 93 was buried there..........derpity derp derp.
When I was wasting my time trying to have a rational discussion with him, he claimed he knows of "numerous" plane-buried witnesses, but just like that ONE photo, he could only produce ONE of these supposed witnesses in which he offered NO proof they were actually a plane-buried witness. I keep pressing him to show these other "numerous" witnesses, but he always refused to, just like the other skeptic who claims to have plane-buried evidence, but always refused to post it. It was pretty pathetic.
Stop insulting people with your posts then? How about some evidence that United 93 was planted? You want to take the challenge that your compadre suede appears unwilling to take on? Just asking, since it's been kind of hanging out there and all......
I've, personally, never claimed it was all buried. From what I've read, the debris was found in the ground, on the ground, in the trees, in the lake.....you know, in a lot of places. The one pic you asked for was buried, so...... Anyway, got any evidence that proves ANY of the debris was planted?
