Speaking of impeachment.........

What do call tRumps nonsense that the election was stolen?

 

I don't watch television or the news so none of whatever you're talking has influenced me.

Did you consider that media reports what their sponsors want them to report? You know, the people that keep them employed.

 

Because the facts on the ground raise those types of questions.

Compare and contrast. For the right to claim that the election was stolen, they have to have reasons. There are dozens and dozens of reasons. Some legit, some not.

For the left to claim this is all a "Big Lie" all they have to do is get Jerkin Tubin or Rachel Madcow to say 'Big Lie' and the left will run around parroting this unthinkingly.

 

And never backed up with a link, I don't think your opinion works in that context.

 

You need to find a more acceptable way to debate Maddow's opinions. I don't watch her and I think everything tRump has said about the election amounts to the BIGGEST lie ever perpetrated on the AmeriCAN public.

 

HUH?

 

So you don't watch her, but you're repeating her baseless claim. Looks like she still got to you.

 

dems need to add seats to the court and fill them with the new 50 vote rule Republicans changed

 

Turn the SC into another legislative branch - the goal of Democrats for decades. Uh, no thanks. Move to Russia if you like that stuff.

 

the right elected the Birther king and follows him like a cult leader, and the right claims it's the left that is not critical thinkers?

 

Many on the right didn't follow the birth certificate fiasco.

But I've yet to meet a leftist who thinks that the election was suspect. The left demonstrably sticks with the MSNBC and CNN talking points much better than the right. As you demonstrate.

 

the SC is broken, once republicans change the votes to 50 and stacked the court, it was over

 

No it's not. You just don't like their decisions. That doesn't make it broken, lol. Good grief.

 

the right's phrase "stop the steal" is just proof that the right is what they are claiming the left is

Trump lost, get over it

 

I do not like that republicans changed the votes required for a SC pick from 60 to 50

now that court is partisan, filled with far right judges

so if democrats want to add seats and the rules allow it, I say do it

 

Too bad. We get it. You don't like it. Democrats shouldn't have set that precedent. That does NOT make the SC "broken", lol.

 

yep, now that republicans did it, if democrats want to add seats and the rules allow it, I say do it

 

Well, if it means protecting the rights of all from the beliefs of a few, then yes, I totally agree.

 

They were just following Democrat precedence.

Now, expanding the seats on the court is a different thing from replacing a justice. Not that you would understand the difference. But it is.

 

The rights of all?

Since when did leftists care about that, lol?

 

Per the norm, another limited thought post. I'll repeat what I said for emphasis and the record :

Well, if it means protecting the rights of all from the beliefs of a few, then yes, I totally agree.

 

That is your opinion. I simply pointed out that, contrary to your post, SCOTUS did not rule that the Texas law is either constitutional or unconstitutional.

 

So you can't explain yourself. Typical.

 

Prohibiting slavery was, at one time, blatantly unconstitutional. Bravo for your willingness to blindly follow precedent. When are you buying some slaves?

 

Reaching for a straw--------man is still reaching, this post shows the tipping over. Reread my post in the context of whom and what I quoted and see if it makes sense. If it doesn't, read it again until it does.