Stopping President Trump's Emergency Doesn't Need Veto Proof Vote!

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by JimfromPennsylvania, Feb 25, 2019.

  1. JimfromPennsylvania

    JimfromPennsylvania Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    614
    Likes Received:
    136
    Trophy Points:
    43
    It seems that a grave and shocking injustice is being perpetrated on the American by what is being proclaimed in the media that is needed to stop President Donald Trump's power grab in calling a national emergency and re-appropriating money for a southern border wall that Congress appropriated for other purposes. Media reports are setting the bar too high on what is needed to stop President Trump, the media is saying that what is needed is either a resolution passed by both chambers of Congress with the President signing the resolution or both chamber overriding a Presidential veto on the resolution. But if one actually reads the 1976 National emergencies act provisions they only say that each chamber of Congress must pass a concurrent resolution to terminate a Presidential emergency declaration; by definition a concurrent resolution does not need to be submitted to the President for his signature! It is readily achievable for the American people through their representatives in Congress to stop this Presidential power grab!
     
  2. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,488
    Likes Received:
    11,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A congressional resolution, to have any legal effect or impact has to be signed by the president. Otherwise it is just a statement of opinion.
     

Share This Page