Study finds US gay men becoming less promiscuous

Are you a broken record?

 

Because everyone NOW , already has the SAME RULES.

And any homo can ALREADY do the exact same thing as any "breeder".

 

So what? The same will be true after gay marriage as well. So what are you losing?

And the same will be true with gay marriage...there are no special privileges. You will have all the exact same options as any homo.

 

meant over 30% of HIV cases are heterosexuals.

race is not behavior. attraction to the same sex is not behavior. marrying someone of the opposite race is behavior, marrying someone of the same sex is behavior.

laws applying to race were found unconstitutional and they used the IDENTICAL arguments that you are trying to use. that's why you keep losing in court.

 

Heterosexuals make up over 95% of the poluation=30% of ADS cases in the US.

However, 61% of US AIDS cases are HOMOSEXUAL/BISEXUAL men, despite being 2% or LESS of the population.. Sorry.


Grasp the "not so subtle" difference?


Race is not BEHAVIOR, and the laws regaridng race and marriage apply to EVERYONE equally, just as they also do to gays.

No one arguing against racial discrimination in marriage laws, cited GENITAL PREFERENCE, at any time.

Make up some more nonsense.

 

everyone in the 60's had the same rules. any black man could ALREADY do the exact same thing as any "white"

that didn't work back then either.

 

No the rules were different: white people rules: were prohibted from marrying black people;
black people rules: were prohibited from amrrying white people.

DIFFERENT RULES. Fixed now.

There are NO marriage rules which apply only to gays.

 

over 30% of HIV cases are heterosexuals.

race is not behavior. attraction to the same sex is not behavior. marrying someone of the opposite race is behavior, marrying someone of the same sex is behavior.

laws applying to race were found unconstitutional and they used the IDENTICAL arguments that you are trying to use. that's why you keep losing in court.

- - - Updated - - -

rules were identical.

same rules, but found unconstitutional.

there were NO marriage rules which only applied to blacks.

 

Comprehension troubles...again?

Whites were not prohibited from marrying whites...BLACKS ONLY WERE= "rule that applied only to blacks".

BLack were not prohibited from marrying blacks..WHITES ONLY WERE.

DIFFERENT RULES..now corrected.

Please quote arguments from the 60's, presented in court, against race-based marriage rules that cite HOMOSEXUALITY.

96% PLUS of the NON-GAY population= 30% of AIDS in the US.

2% or LESS of the population, HOMOSEXUAL/BISEXUAL MALES = 61% of AIDS in US.

YEah...those are "comparable".

How you think continually bringing up the HORRIFIC TRUTH about HOMSEXUALITY and AIDS is making your case, is a mysteryt to the more sentient here.

 

He didn't mention any statistics. The article mentioned statistics. What statistical bias do you see in the study?

 

Yes, but they can't legally marry people of the same gender in every state. But don't worry, progress is being made. Look at how many states have legalized same-sex marriage this year alone. At this rate, all 50 states will have legalized same-sex marriage without the US Supreme Court's decisions. God bless America.

 

comprehension troubles.....again?

blacks were prevented from marrying someone of a different race.
whites were prevented frommarrying someone of a different race.

SAME RULES....found unconstitutional.

whyWOLD I do THAT?

so?

yes, DISEASE spreads RAPIDLY in a SMALL population.

correct.

I am FORCED to CORRECT bigots WHEN they POST incorrect INFORMATION in ORDER to MAKE an ARGUMENT

 

So everyone on both sides appears to agree that gay marriage does not take away any rights from anyone.

Glad we got that out of the way.

 

Wrong. Blacks and white could BOTH marry orientals,and Native Americans.

White could not marry blacks= RULE FOR WHITES ONLY

Blacks could not marry whites= RULE FOR BLACKS ONLY.

Your desperate attempts to REWORD the laws, as well as the TOTAL LIE that arguments against RACE-BASED MARRIAGE RULES are "the same" as BEHAVIOR-BASED MARROAGE RULES, are a COMPLETE, ILLOGICAL FAILURE.

Still waiting for your QUOTE of court case citing HOMOSEXUALITY in the 1960's, while arguing for the end of race-based marriage rules. Lie much?


Current marriage rules apply to EVERYONE, EQUALLY.

Same rules.

Disease spreads rapidly among the MOST PROMISCUOUS= HOMOSEXUAL/BISEXUAL MALES.

They are the "League leaders" is ALL STDs..except , maybe chlamydia..MAYBE.

 

It DOES, however , confer "special exception" (rights), to a minority. A GLARING 14th Amendment violation, which assures EQUAL application of the law.

EQUAL= the SAME LAW FOR ALL.

" Glad we got that out of the way".

 

BuT HeTeRoSeXuAlS ArE ThE MoSt InFeCtEd, So ClEaRly ThAt Is FaLsE

ExCePt ThEy'Re NoT

 

If everyone else is getting the exact same rights, how is it conferring rights only to a minority?

How would application of the law be unequal if everyone is getting the exact same rights? Why are you so afraid to answer that question?

This law would apply to everyone. Therefore, according to you, it would be equal.

 

It DoEs No SuCh ThInG. YoU WiLl Be AbLe To MaRrY a MaN, JuSt LiKe a HoMoSeXuAl CoUlD. EqUaL RiGhTs FoR AlL

 

Once again... NOT IN THE US, where WELL OVER HALF (61%) of AIDS cases are HOMOSEXUAL/BISEXUAL men.


MOST AIDS in the US is in HOMOSEXUAL/BISEXUAL men.

LIE SOME MORE.


PLease quote a SINGLE rule of marriage that does not aply to everyone.

Your complete failure on both points, is duly noted.

 

You should stick to that AIDS argument. You appear to have already lost the other one.

 

Everyone already has the exact same rights.

 

And will still have the same exact same rights after gay marriage. In fact, their rights will be expanded...they will have more rights than before.

So what is the point of keeping gay marriage illegal?

 

Only if we discard logic,and linear thought.

There is no need to REDEFINE MARRIAGE, to suit an emotional desire, based on genital preference.

- - - Updated - - -

It is the proven will of the voter. Changing the law BASED ON BEHAVIOR is not a "rights" issue.

 

There is a need. Because rights are being denied to people for no reason.

- - - Updated - - -

You mean like in Rhode Island?

Are you suggesting it is ok to deny rights to people based only on majority opinion?

 

So much wrong in so few words.

1. No its not.
2. Even if it were, that does not make it right. If the majority of people wanted slavery, slavery would still be wrong.