Study finds US gay men becoming less promiscuous

Right. So, again, nothing will change your mind, and you are entirely willing to ignore any and all evidence that would go against your viewpoint on grounds of a bias you have "discovered", and nothing short of something which is absolutely unreasonable (and indeed virtually unrelated) would make you change your mind on that. Open-minded is something else.

Buddy, if we were in the business of suing people for anonymous posts on message boards, I'd have sued you for slander... And won.

- - - Updated - - -

No, but if you aren't allowed to hold your relationship in the public sphere, it's quite difficult to stay monogamous.

 

Yes, as proven by the promiscuity of many heterosexual marriages and a 50% divorce rate.

 

how can you defend the behavior when your own group has such a high per capita incidence of HIV? I would figure that you'd want to resolve it vs trying to sugar coat over it. It's a major problem and obviously homosexuals are not interested in heterosexuals helping.

Why do you want to see such a small segment of the population have such a high % rate of infection?

 

You are only citing US infection rates. The majority of AIDS cases worldwide are among heterosexuals.

- - - Updated - - -

Proven lie

 

take it up with the OP who created the thread "study-finds-us-gay-men-becoming-less-promiscuous"

If I'm not mistaken, this thread is about gays in the USA

 

How much do you trust studies out of The Family Research Council? Exactly as much as I trust their ideological opposite, all of modern American academia. The agenda of both is obvious to the honest observer.

 

Gay marriage has nothing to do with polygamy, no matter how desperately you want it to

 

Lol, my group is the heterosexual group. We have the largest infection rates by far. But that doesn't mesh with your hatred of gays so you cherry pick only US rates.

It would be easier, and better for your credibility if you would just admit you don't like gays and think they're icky. It would save you from having to perform so many logical gymnastics

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not the one herry picking. So i will continue to call you guys on it until you can debate honestly

 

Complete LIE again. 61% of HIV infections are in MSM..which, BTW are NOT "heterosexual"

Homosexual/bisexual men not only have a MONUMNETALLY HIGHER RATE of HIV/AIDS infections, they also have OVER HALF of the TOTAL NUMBER of infections,as proven in the CDC link I provided.


Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM):


By risk group, gay, bisexual, and other MSM of all races remain the population most severely affected by HIV.

•MSM accounted for 61% of all new HIV infections in the U.S. in 2009, as well as nearly half (49%) of people living with HIV in 2008 (the most recent year national prevalence data is available).
•CDC estimates that MSM account for just 2% of the U.S. male population aged 13 and older, but accounted for more than 50% of all new HIV infections annually from 2006 to 2009. In 2010, MSM accounted for 61% of HIV diagnoses.


http://aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/hiv-aids-101/statistics/

Of course, we all know that LYING about the facts is SOP with your posts....lie some more.

 

No, the article was about gay behavior in the USA. You homophobes brought up statistics. So now someone has shown that HIV/AIDS is more a heterosexual problem worldwide. So, over time, it could become the same problem here. Most gays understand the problem and follow protected sex practices. Most heterosexuals see a pretty girl and want to have unprotected sex because they are too "macho" to use protection.

 

Cherry picking stats. The majority of infections are among heterosexuals

 

hmmm

so the thread is about a study of gay men in the USA

we are discussing facts on HIV and gays in the USA within the aforementioned thread

I'm not sure I follow you

we're discussing vanilla ice cream within a thread about vanilla ice cream but you want to discuss furniture polish.

so, the thread is about the USA, we're discussing facts within the USA

 

Let me explain "other MSM". That is sex with men by those claiming to be heterosexual. Probably prisoners and other rapists. Notice the increase in black infections. There is a higher level of blacks in prison.

There is also an increase in prostitutes' infection.

Keep thinking that it is gay promiscuity while ignoring the growing problem for heterosexuals.

 

Who cares? Some progressive leftist loser propaganda puff piece that suggests that gay perversity is become less incideous. Bovine scat.

 

I believe the synopsis is more pointing out that Marriage promotes monogamy, rather than it is the only reason for it.

 

Marriage makes monogamy more likely. Because individuals have more invested in the relationship.

 

oh good grief. What exactly is "gay behavior"?

Is that when you follow the militant gay talking points despite being factually incorrect?

this thread is about gay men in the USA and promiscuity with the inference that gay marriage has anything to do with it.

It was then suggested as an opposing theory that perhaps the HIV rate had some factor in the USA and that causality can't be drawn from gay marriage because no facts support that. Again, we're discussing the USA , save the histrionics for the subsection where it's welcomed.

 

There is a correlation between allowing gays to marry and gay men becoming less promiscuous. As Sadistic-Savior pointed out, when you have a marriage, you are more vested into a relationship and are less likely to be promiscuous.

Tuff that you do not like this.

 

grok is advocating quarantining homosexuals because he thinks they are the highest group infected. I pointed out that that is false. you guys continue to cherry pick your stats to make gay=bad. I will continue to call you guys on it until you can debate honestly.

actually an appropriate analogy would be you are discussing dairy queen, and I am discussing ice cream.

 

I did not read that Grok was advocating for a quarantine. I read an if/then statement to be specific, if x then why not perform y?

We are simply discussing US statistics within a thread about US. There is no gay bashing involved unless of course actual facts is considered bashing

 

Right here:

This is the ilk you are aligning yourself with. Bravo!

 

thank you for putting that up

now feel free to read it in the entire context

why do you stoop to such petty nonsense within these threads? Those of us with common sense are not your enemy.

 

Oh, that's cute. So because I have a different take based on observation of human behavior, you think I'm confused. Evidently, you know what goes on inside everybody's heads and can irrefutably determine their true motives. Either that or you're just extremely naive and take their words at face value without question. Orrrrrrrrrrr............ perhaps you just have a knee-jerk need to get offended by things that aren't politically correct. Ya think maybe that last one might be it?

 

Figures you would support quarantining homosexuals.

 

Right, and the ideological opposite of every biologist who has ever looked at race is the KKK, and they're both equally trustworthy. This has got to be one of the more asinine statements I've ever heard you make, which is saying something.