Susan Boyle assaulted, harassed by gang of 15 youths

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Hispanic_and_Latino_Americans#Race

https://web.archive.org/web/20110429214029/http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf

 

Anyone can write a thinkpiece and make all sorts of claims and pass that off as validation for their incredibly skewered beliefs. This proves nothing.

 

"White" refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicated their race(s) as "White" or reported entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Arab, Moroccan, or Caucasian.


So, basically, a "catch-all" grouping that means next to nothing. Arabs aren't white.

 

It's an article written by a black woman upset with how many black men prefer white women over black women. Why wouldn't her views be credible? She's the one suffering from this multiracial experiment, alongside Asian men. They're the ones being left out in the cold.

 

Okay. "White" also refers to a person's race, "Hispanic" refers to ethnicity.

 

So? People write articles everyday, black people write articles too, one being from a black woman doesn't prove or disprove anything. I'm not impressed.

Unless I see this with my own two eyes in the real world, I don't buy it.

 

"
Data from the 2010 Census provide insights to our racially and ethnically diverse nation. According to the 2010 Census, 308.7 million people resided in the United States on April 1, 2010—an increase of 27.3 million people, or 9.7 percent, between 2000 and 2010. The vast majority of the growth in the total population came from increases in those who reported their race(s) as something other than White alone and those who reported their ethnicity as Hispanic or Latino."

Did you even read your sources? They're not identifying as white, but as more than one race. That makes sense, since they are a mixed group. There are some racially white Hispanics (many in Argentina and elsewhere in South America, as well as certain pockets of Mexico and Central America), but we aren't getting very many of those as immigrants to the US. This is what most Mexican immigrants look like:



They're not white.

 

You can see it with your own eyes. Tons of black men are dating outside of their race. You probably are (or have).

 

Tons of black men also date within their race. Neither proves or disproves anything.

 

I didn't even mention immigrants. My point is you can be both white and Hispanic. Or black and Hispanic. Or Asian and Hispanic.

 

So black men are 3-4 times more likely than white men to marry outside of their race, and the overwhelming majority are going after white women.

 

So it's really a meaningless term. That's when the mirror test comes in handy. It's pretty easy to see that someone is not white when they lack the characteristics that white people have.

 

Yet more than 10x as many marrying within their race.

Again, nothing proven nor disproven.

 

Characteristics such as?

 

You don't need any help figuring out these differences, btw. They're instantly identifiable when you see them. There's no need to check your ideology's orthodoxy in order to figure it out. It's an instinct you are born with.

 

If you say so.

 

It's true. You as a black man are probably better at recognizing racial differences than most white people, since you've been viewing things by race for a lot longer than most of them, and you have been under no pressure at all by society to view things in a colorblind way, unlike whites.

 

Not exactly. Then again my daily schedule doesn't start with playing "guess the race."

 

Good grief you couldn't be anymore wrong. In most places, just your name alone, can determine wher you are from. In the US that is now impossible. I have little doubt, if you were to do a DNA test, you would be most unpleasantly surprised.

 

[

There isn't any reason to think it would make any difference either. The reason Hispanic nations aren't like America is the same reason they aren't like each other, they differ as to geography and history.

If you think that Swedes and Norwegians are the same as Finns you clearly need to read up on Finland. If you go to Finland you can easily think you're in Turkey going by the people you see and the language is different from any other in Europe, not being even in the Indo-European family, but the Finno-Ugraic. Most people think the Finns are Turkomans that went north in far antiquity, though some think they are descendants of the strangely Caucasian appearing skeletons in Western China that were discovered only in the last few decades. They are definitely not Scandinavian, Swedes and Norwegians think so and most Finns agree, regarding it as pejorative to be called so.

 

Nope, already done. 100% European, 99.0% being Northwestern European, mostly Scandinavian. No African, Asian, or Jewish DNA.

 

One has to wonder how many of the White Nationalists would be thrown out if DNA Testing was required for admission to their white paradises.

 

You don't think Shaquille O'Neal is of Irish descent?

 

Don't worry, we won't hold it against you

 

They are much closer to each other than they are to European societies.

Turkey? Finns look nothing like people from Turkey.

Finns:



Turks:



Language means very little, and yes, Finnish is not in the same Indo-European language family. It is similar to Estonian and Hungarian.


Stop with the Jewish lies. Just because your people are mixed race doesn't mean everyone in the world is.