Theory: The terrorists love Obama because he's their friend anf they know he hates Israel. They know he is losing the election on the ecobomy. They attack our embassy thinking it might change the subject here in the US and help him get re-elected. Well?
Stupid theory. Stupid assumptions. The only person these attacks are likely to 'help' is Mitt Romney's election. And I happen to think that Mitt would prefer that no Americans are killed in order to get himself elected.
You think popping a few *******s with drones is waging war? If you do then you are a fool. In fact, drone attacks are stupid. You don't get intelligence from a corpse. Obama is living off the intelligence gained by Bush. Once that dries up we'll be screwed.
Now, now I can't say anything that would be considered a metapost, though it's what I want to say. So I'll say this instead. Why would they want to help him? Obama managed to do some serious damage to Al Queda, why would any terrorist group risk peeving a man off, who killed Osama Bin Laden?
Hmmm fool? I am not the one who posted a quote attributed to Obama that was shown to be a lie in 2008! Now that person is a fool! Now did I claim that targetting terrorists with drones is war? No. What it is is an effective strategy against terrorist leaders. As opposed to invading the country of Iraq for instance. If all we were doing was drone attacks you might have a point. But Osama Bin Ladin wasn't killed by a drone attack, he was taken down by the helicopter special force raids which are happening regularly- and intelligence is being gathered all the time. Drone attacks are particularly effective when raids are likely to be ineffective or too costly. Between the raids and the drones, the terrorists are forced to communicate with paper messages and to constantly stay on the move. And if you think the raids and drones are the result of intelligence gained over 4 years ago- well then you truly are an idiot. And if it was John McCain or GW Bush doing them- you would be kissing their butts in happiness. Me? I am just glad terrorists are getting whacked.
Some deep thinking there. Killing off their leadership faster than they can find their new "#2's" is at the very least a serious distraction for them - especially those having to hand carry their communications from one place to the other. And killing bin Laden had nothing to do with Bush - he'd quit thinking and worrying about him long ago as he himself said to reporters. If he hadn't thought or worried about him for years - what kind of "intelligence" could he possibly have left behind for Obama to use? It was Bush's considered opinion that bin Laden was living in a cave somewhere - "on the run" as he so often said when asked about bin Laden. Any "intelligence" gained by Bush dried up long ago - while he was still in office and about the time he said he "didn't hardly think about him any more". lmfao!
Too far fetched, the terrorists are islamists. Islamists do what they always do, kill innocent people. You logic as such could be a valid reason for the terrorists, but I am convinced they are unable to have such thoughts. Anyway, why should Obama be a friend of the terrorists? As far as I see it, he is fighting them just as Bush did and as Romney would do.
OP 's opinion is far fetched This is what really happened : 14' trailer of a (*)(*)(*)(*)ty B movie that doesn't exist is posted in youtube and decides the elections of the only world's superpower .
These people believe in laying down their life for the cause, that if they become martyrs they'll be rewarded in heaven. ... I don't think they will be intimidated or worried about "peeving" Obama. Apparently they weren't intimidated enough to not assassinate our ambassador on 9/11/12.
Obama gave Israel Iron Dome and increased their foreign aid.. He's just not going to waste his time talking in circles with Bibi.
What is that suppose to mean? Obama is freinds with his Muslim brotherhood; he has shown nothing but disrespect for the Israelis from day one.
Perhaps he should do it the way Bush did? With American casualties of 55,000+? Let me think on that one....
You're thinking about indivduals, not groups. If everyone just killed themselves at once, that wouldn't be that good for the group, after all who's left to run it?
