The Antifa/FBI Coalition

The Antifa/FBI Coalition


https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/07/the_antifafbi_coalition.html


Like with the current case against the Wolverine Watchmen the FBI had them fully infiltrated and even had one in a position of leadership. What is inexplicable is that both Congress and DC turned down help even though FBI agents knew there could be violence at the capitol on 6/1.


As time goes on more is learned including how Antifa infiltrated the crowd in DC so some will better understand the truth about what is happening in our country.


Snip…


It is preposterous to contend that the FBI did not have operatives in this disturbance as Christopher Wray contends. Journalist Glenn Greenwald commented, “What would be shocking and strange is not if the FBI had embedded informants and other infiltrators in the groups planning the January 6 Capitol riot. What would be shocking and strange—bizarre and inexplicable—is if the FBI did not have those groups under tight control.”


Snip…


The New York Times reported:

The Capitol Police had clearer advance warnings about the Jan. 6 attack than were previously known, including the potential for violence in which “Congress itself is the target.” But officers were instructed by their leaders not to use their most aggressive tactics to hold off the mob, according to a scathing new report by the agency’s internal investigator.

 

the fbi has always been involved in left wing organizations; the right, not so much.

occupy or "eco terrorists" have never killed anyone, but i guess they are more fun to infiltrate than the army of god or the proud boys.

 

The old, "It's not my fault because the police didn't stop me," excuse ... whatever, dude.

 

Doesn’t concern you that the FBI does the planning and training?

 

Antyfay shows up at any Conservative event of any size, to think they sat this one out, is naive, to put it politely.

 

Then you missed the point. Why do you suppose the FBI allowed this to happen even though, clearly, they were well informed about it?

 

Because arresting Trump before the event might have been problematic.

 

Wow, rational thought need not apply. Why need facts when you have fantasies.

 

Dude - grow a sense of humor.

 

They did sit this one out. They told members there that it would look bad to confront Trump supporters at this event. Sullivan’s brother said there were 267 Antifa that infiltrated Trump supporters. Why you saw black block dressed actors breaking windows while Trump supporters were yelling to stop them.

 

So the woman who was shot was an Antifa actor, according to you.

 

LOL, more humor?

 

No. You just stated that it was Antifa who were breaking into the Capitol, so that would make the woman who was shot
Antifa - according to you.

 

Ah, more logical fallacy. To be expected.

 

You're poisoning your mind with that crap. It couldn't be more like disinformation straight from Russia if had been written by Putin himself; and it might have been.

 

LIL, facts be damned, it’s Russia.

 

Actually the have bit very few compared to the Antifa and BLM riots but according to the FBI right wing orgs are the preeminent danger so it would be very unusual they have not infiltrated them and like the Proud Boys and the Wolverine Watchmen were in positions of leadership.

 

What facts? The tripe in that article is "Russian STYLE" disinformation/propaganda.

 

The facts you ignore to hold onto conspiracy theory. This is nothing new.

 

At some point tRumpublicans are going to have to face the fact that the only "election steal" was/is tRump's attempt to change the outcome of the 2020 election he LOST.

Whether that will be before or after Benedict Donald destroys Government BY the PEOPLE (with his sycophants help), is yet to be seen.

 

Not surprised you go off on a rant that is irrelevant to the thread. Try to stay on track.

 

How conspiratorial of you. And just for grins, proof you have the the president was a) responsible for organizing this, b) was possibly the instigator of a crime that you could cite, of c) the agency conspired to allow a potential crime to be committed.

I think any of the above would demonstrate bad faith on the part of the agency and be criminal in and of itself. Don't you?

 

Why would you defend the racially motivated use of force against an unarmed woman?

 

Oh, you only wish I am off track. IF Donald Judas tRump would have accepted the results of "THE MOST FREE AND FAIR ELECTION IN RECENT HISTORY" 106 would have never happened, never been necessary.

But the Mango Monarch has insisted on acting like a child and is throwing a tantrum that threatens OUR Republic.

 

Don't deflect. Was the woman who was shot an Antifa Actor?