THE CARBON TAX FRAUD. Professor Bob Carter.

Professor Bob Carter says it all about AGW and the carbon tax.

 

Ju-LIAR at her best

[video=youtube;J60xoDgNdCM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J60xoDgNdCM[/video]

 

No-one takes Carter seriously. He's bought and paid for by the vested interests.

 

Unlike the others ?

 

Who owns Julia?

 

Such as ?

 

How about this

Source http://www.smh.com.au/news/environm...-change-manmade/2007/03/14/1173722560417.html

In other words he has about as much authority to speak on global warming as dumbanddumber.

 

Bang bang, shot down.

taken from http://theconversation.edu.au/bob-carters-climate-counter-consensus-is-an-alternate-reality-1553

 

Like I said, you keep finding the charlatans, and we will keep exposing them.

I iterate ... Come out of the darkness into the light, for the darkness doesn't exist. It was created in the minds of Abbott and others to try and bolster a weak and dying position. Oh and there will be no CTS on the light when you come, it's called sunlight. Shinning in a bright clear pollution free sky thanks to positive action on climate change.

 

Dont make me laugh dude.

Are you saying that the alamist scientists are any better?

 

Another thread de-bunked .... next thread

 

Is that how you debunk threads is it.

Just roll up and say another thread debunked.

LOL LOL LOL.

Your're a legend dude, keep up the good work.

 

No I showed you a link that de-bunked good old Professor Bob Carter. That de-bunks the claim made, that debunks the thread.

LOL LOL LOL

 

This is debunking.

Finding a proffesor on the internet that critizes my proffesor from the internet.

Ok i thought it was all about debating the topics.

So if you post something and i find someone on the internet that has ridiculed the person you have posted.

Thats debunking.

What does the dictionary say?

 

hahaha!!!!....LMAO...I'd love to have a beer with ya DV. Your shout though, I don't think i could afford the extra cost due to the carbon tax by the sounds of things!

 

Dont forget there is carbon dioxide in our beer.

So do we drink pollution?

We not only breath it we eat it and drink it as well.

Carbon dioxide = plant food, you are what you eat right.

Those filthy vegetables and fruit full of carbon dioxide.

We definetly have to put a price on carbon, since we are a carbon based life form.

Does that makes us pollution?

 

Look, I haven't had a good belly laugh like this for a long time after reading DV's post. I can't help giggling while writing this to be honest..hahaha!!

But anyway dumb, now the argument detracts from carbon intensive! Lets stick around the real issue here/ or argument at least.

 

Well I am on a limited income, $480 per fortnight, but yes I can afford to buy you a beer. I, as should a lot of other self funded retirees and low income earners, are now getting a little more. Good management of my household, and the purchase of a bicycle to replace the car on about 40% of my trips, saves me fuel and gives me exercise. We have put two fairly uneconomical heaters in the recycling and purchased an environmentally friendly, reverse cycle air conditioner. We now scrutinize most of what we do from a different perspective. Since the CTS was put forward, a little bit of thought and care has reduced our household costs by around $100 per week. The CTS is working already, it is not the governments job to do it, IT IS MINE AND YOURS. Stop thinking of number one, and think of your children and grandchildren.

 

The conspirators put up links that "supposedly" debunk Global Warming. But when you debunk the debunkers they cry spilled milk and reckon you're clutching at straws. Easy to see who are clutching at straws. Those that believe the mining industry, oil industry and steel industry about how good they are and how evil the environmentalists are. Get over it, have you heard of Dodo's, your going to join them.

 

Unfortunately you haven't debunked anything, because you cannot prove global warming any more than i can prove global cooling.

All we can do is parrot what is on the internet.

At least i listen to both sides, to make sense of it all.

But when i see bankers and brokers getting in there all i see is SCAM, ripoff, pyramid scheme etc.

 

UM I de-bunked the thread, I showed that Carter is a charleton, like most others that are denialists. Either charletons or corporate spokespersons.

I listen to both sides too my friend, this subject is important.

When I see who is a denialist, that alone would be enough for me not to believe them, but I do look at their science too, or lack off it.

I'm not the slightest bit interested in increasing my standard of living, it is already reaching the unsustainable level, I'm just interested in keeping the earth livable.

Now that in a nutshell is the difference in the two sides... everything else is a smoke screen

 

Nothing wrong with Bob Carter he tells it like it is.

The truth.

 

His version of it you mean

 

Actually DV what has Carter actually said that is wrong? Even your discrediting article does not say he has said anything wrong, just that he ignored other things.

 

LMAO, he just ignored things, well excuse me while I ignore him.