The Huge Difference Between The Trump And Clinton Probes By Post Editorial Board 6/2/18 Clinton’s wrongdoing was established fact from the start — whereas Trump's investigation attempts to find out if there was any wrongdoing. TIMELINE--The House Select Committee on Benghazi started asking questions after a hacker unveiled Clinton’s e-mails with Sidney Blumenthal. Some e-mails were related to the 2012 Benghazi attack yet had never been handed over to investigators. It was soon revealed that Clinton used a private account at the State Dept — leaving the government with no records of her work (contrary to law). That forced State to start collecting Clinton’s communications — and word leaked to the NYT, which broke the news early in March 2015. Clinton soon asked that State make everything public — though much would’ve come out anyway, to retroactively honor countless valid requests that her gambit had stymied. In July, State officials found classified info in the e-mails, and called in the FBI for a counterintelligence investigation. By November, it had become a criminal investigation, since Clinton and her aides clearly jeopardized national security. For months, State was slowly reviewing, redacting and publicly releasing the e-mails — creating new headlines with each dump. And Clinton’s ever-changing denials and excuses created more. All along, the FBI probe remained confidential, though some necessarily public details rightly made headlines; for example, DOJ decisions to give various Clinton aides partial or full immunity. Then-Pres Obama in April 2016 publicly declared that Clinton would come out in the clear because she never intended to endanger national security. (He didn’t reveal that he was involved, since he’d e-mailed with Clinton at her private address — and the FBI kept that quiet, too.) Months later, FBI chief Jim Comey would offer Obama’s exact reasoning as his justification for saying she shouldn’t be charged — even though the relevant statutes make intent irrelevant. ~Snip~ At this point, you have to assume that two years of investigations have yet to come up with any significant evidence of Trump campaign misdoing with Russia — at least, not by the president or anyone now around him. It boggles the mind that Mueller would keep quiet if he has serious reason to fear Kremlin strings on the White House. Source: https://nypost.com/2018/06/02/theres-a-huge-difference-between-the-trump-and-clinton-probes/ ~~~~~~ As each day goes by, this investigation make the Watergate scandal look miniscule in comparison. The evidence is clear that the criminals involved in this humongous criminal enterprise are trying their best to hide the criminal for crimes they have and are committing upon others. The question is will they pay for their criminal actions? To date, there hasn’t been a single charge that came out of the email investigation. If they weren’t going to charge Hillary, they certainly weren’t going to charge the players below her. Even the Awan brothers have had their legal bills covered. There was potential for some big time national security damage and pay to play criminal activity, yet the "Deep State" has had their minions within the DoJ covering their butts as we've seen by the exposure of cabal within the FBI as McCabe, Strzok, Page, Baker and others.
