The NIST 9/11 Scam Exposed in All Its Glory

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, May 30, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Uhuh. Well thanks, I have no such misguided anything.

    I present the slam dunk evidence and the viewers see you doing everything you can to discredit it, with your bizarre evolving crappy excuses. We went from "light refraction due to heat shees", to "refraction", to "smoke", to "artifacts", to "it's fake" then to some batshit about "materially altered video" - ending with the profoundly daft "cgi overlay".

    Game over, the penthouse drops through the building. Proven.
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    all your claims are based on altered video clips.
    to state it accurately the penthouse disappears, nothing can be seen dropping through the building.
    another case of you want everyone to imagine what you imagine instead of whats actually there. :deadhorse::roflol:
     
  3. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    PROVE IT!

    We went from "light refraction due to heat shees", to "refraction", to "smoke", to "artifacts", to "it's fake" then to some batshit about "materially altered video" - ending with the profoundly daft "cgi overlay". Each claim offering jack to back it up!

    And the building clearly shows a wave descending in perfect sync. Game over, we're done.

    Well the penthouse and section directly under it aren't "nothing". Why so worried about it? You seem to be desperate to cover this up. Surely the evidence is more important than the conclusion.

    No imagination is necessary, we can see what's there and it buries the ridiculous "demolition" schtick.

    Viewers keeping track with this thread will understand the nature of how science works. It is a matter of taking the evidence and formulating the opinion accordingly. It is not fixating on batshit and doing everything possible to maintain such fixation.

    First view:

    Enhanced:

    Newer GIF:
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh so it shows a wave, not the penthouse.
    Im sure you realize that a penthouse is not a wave.
    There is your proof!
    penthouse != wave
    wave = wave
    penthouse = penthouse
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  5. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hilarious. All this failed effort to disprove the penthouse clearly collapsing through the building. I'm trying to recall where this was claimed before, oh wait!

    Now, as far as I can tell, the only thing wrong with this computer anlysis, was the deformation of the upper section. But otherwise not far off what we are seeing. Game over, no "scam exposed" in any "glory". NIST were one of two studies that extensively mapped the fires within the building, neither of them support this ludicrous "demolition" schtick.

    Covered here and ignored half a dozen times:
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-all-its-glory.458597/page-30#post-1074262279

    So the "ebil-gubment" "altered" this clip for some reason, yet here you are suggesting it doesn't mean anything, whilst spending ages trying to cover it up. Hmmm, seems like it most certainly DOES mean something!
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  6. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,485
    Likes Received:
    1,508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    show your evidence that video clips have been altered …’better yet , show us evidence that cgi was used in any of the crashes …
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just noticed BETA FAILED AGAIN to cite the original clip again from NBC.

    Instead he puts up NIST's black-eye-embarrassment created and intended to demonstrate the actual demolition (models ALWAYS are intended to precisely mimic what is seen in the real world) and their black eye embarrassment does not remotely look/act like the actual event (defeating the whole purpose of creating a model in the first place)!

    The only reason I can think of, well 2 reasons, first HE FAILED to provide an original NBC clip and this is a nice move the goal posts distraction,

    Second, maybe because he has no clue what so ever what a massive failure and embarrassment that is to NIST and the engineering community.
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  8. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Noise again. it's game over folks, the penthouse clearly collapsed through the building, just like the NIST fire modeling analysis.

     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  9. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Anyone would think he's trying to bury this slam dunk evidence.

    P.s. if it isn't slam dunk, why do you figure he's trying to say they faked the reported video with "cgi-batshittery"?
     
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I dont have to prove it didnt, its your claim,

    THEREFORE YOU HAVE TO PROVE:

    1) That is in fact a penthouse. FAILED
    2) That it in fact fell through all those floors. FAILED
    3) That your clip is NOT cgi FAILED
    4) That the model looks identical to real event FAILED


    None of us can see anything that looks like a penthouse falling inside the building.

    So that is supposed to be prove?

    The NIST embarrassment with cgi'd video clips and call game over?

    I dont know if I should laugh till I puke or cry!

    Beta in science...if the model does not look the same its not.

    You see the NIST version that you posted wrinkled up like a piece of paper on the way down, so badly they stopped it before it fell over sideways.

    The real even had very little deformation.

    Bob gave you plenty of material in the OP proving thats all nonsense

    Shear Ignorance -
    NIST and WTC7 The Expanding Lie -
    Tangled Webs NIST and WTC7 -
    NIST and WTC7 maladmiNISTration -
    WTC7 - The Stiffener Plates Explained -

    A technical article called MaladmiNISTration - http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/822-maladministration.html

    A letter from Dr. William F. Pepper which includes a detailed technical discussion - http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2014JanLetterPepper.pdf

    Quick way to lose all credibility is when such things are in our faces obvious as they are in that post.

    Ive seen some ludicrous claims out here but I have to admit I never imagined that Id ever see a post of the NIST model of all things that has been peer reviewed proven fraud. wow!

    :deadhorse:
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  11. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Noise and spam, thanks for providing it, but it's all irrelevant. The actual NBC footage shows the penthouse collapsing through the building, it's proven. The amount of time you are spending on this shows how serious you know this is.
    I'm sure somewhere along the line you forgot that it was actually YOUR claim, what with you providing all the other daft excuses for it.(We went from "light refraction due to heat shees", to "refraction", to "smoke", to "artifacts", to "it's fake" then to some batshit about "materially altered video" - ending with the profoundly daft "cgi overlay".)

    YOU claim the video is "CGI" - "cgi overlay, very poorly done I might add."

    PROVE IT!
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Validate the authenticity, prove its the original from NBC.
    Otherwise its garbage that some debunker put out here as a disinformation joke.
    I cant believe this has degenerated into such nonsense.

    YOU HAVE TO PROVE:

    1) That is in fact a penthouse. FAILED
    2) That it in fact fell through all those floors. FAILED
    3) That your clip is NOT cgi FAILED
    4) That the model looks identical to real event FAILED


    None of us can see anything that looks like a penthouse falling inside the building.

    You cant cite it;

    Clearly the clip you posted is NOT authentic :evileye:


    Clearly the only demonstration you have that its the penthouse is NISTS long debunked peer reviewed as fraud model. I dont know why you continue you have long lost the initiative.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  13. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [QUOTE="Kokomojojo, post: 1074263921, member: 28583"]Validate the authenticity, prove its the original from NBC.Otherwise its garbage that some debunker put out here as a disinformation joke.I cant believe this has degenerated into such nonsense.YOU HAVE TO PROVE:1) That is in fact a penthouse. FAILED2) That it in fact fell through all those floors. FAILED3) That your clip is NOT cgi FAILED4) That the model looks identical to real event FAILEDNone of us can see anything that looks like a penthouse falling inside the building.You cant cite it;Clearly the clip you posted is NOT authentic Clearly the only demonstration you have that its the penthouse is NISTS long debunked peer reviewed as fraud model.I dont know why you continue you have long lost the initiative.[/QUOTE]
    Deja-vu noise.
    Please stop using "us" and "we". You're on your own and your desperation to cover up the slam dunk evidence is obvious.


    Recap:

     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  14. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    YOU claim the video is "CGI" - "cgi overlay, very poorly done I might add."
    PROVE IT!
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    outline the penthouse on the way down in a couple stills, WE really want to believe you but all WE see is fantasy, sorry.

    3 will do nicely, then give me the frame numbers so WE can review your claim.

    Seems you are the only one that claims to see it! :spin:
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  16. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You aren't a "we". Your desperation is really showing now. You've been given two copies of the NBC footage and an animated gif showing quite clearly the penthouse dropping through the building. Game over and you know it.

    And yet your posts show increasing desperation in trying to cover up this slam dunk evidence.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Im the spokesman for WE!
    My posts show increasing interest in your validating your claims are authentic and so far you have demonstrated a total failure to do so. so far virtually every claim you made has been proven wrong and posting your opinions is not evidence lol

    Part:
    1) fail
    2) fail
    3) fail
    4) fail
    5) fail
    6) fail

    After all those failures Id think youd cash it in.

     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  18. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Noise. Luckily we don't need any reply from this poster to be able to dismantle this "demolition" schtick. Still no reply to the following:

    Game over, the collapse wave drops right to the bottom from the penthouse. CORE PROPOGATION VISIBLE
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Beta, there is no such thing as a collapse wave.
    Beta it was not a rop down demolition like wtc 1 and 2
    Beta no core can be seen from the outside of the building in anything you posted.
     
  20. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Desperation is very high here. Accurate spelling

    The viewers can all see the same thing. They all know the ridiculous claim of CGI is actual evasion. The video is real, as is the penthouse collapsing through the building with a clearly visible wave.

    Newer GIF:
    [​IMG]

    Game over. There's no NIST scam going on, just awful, awful physics from "911-truthers"! Look at the list at the top of this page. It just doesn't make ANY sense. Why pre-rig a building for demolition when there is no guarantee conditions will occur to provide an alternative! Then again, what world of utter nonsense do hushabooms exist that can survive many hours of unabated fire?

    No wonder we're seeing so much obfuscation here.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes they can see you FAILED to address so much as one counterpoint.
    Hell you cant even validate your video!
    Keep up the good work!
     
  22. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hilarious.
    kokomojojo: all your claims are based on altered video clips.
    Me: PROVE IT!

    We went from "light refraction due to heat shees", to "refraction", to "smoke", to "artifacts", to "it's fake" then to some batshit about "materially altered video" - ending with the profoundly daft "cgi overlay". Each claim offering jack to back it up!
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Too bad.

    Yep, different pics different problems.
    Awe one minor issue with that, if you want to enter them into evidence then the burden of proof is all on you.
    Doesnt that suk?
    Oh its easy for me to prove my point.

    https://s12.gifyu.com/images/Suotc.gif

    See that it says gify not NBC. The authentic version, says NBC in the link.

    youtu.be/Bx2Kx2AkXEg

    Oh look that one says youtube! Not NBC.

    There I just proved your clips are not authentic, hope yer happy now.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2023
  24. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,219
    Likes Received:
    815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Noise.
    kokomojojo: all your claims are based on altered video clips.
    Me: PROVE IT!

    We went from "light refraction due to heat shees", to "refraction", to "smoke", to "artifacts", to "it's fake" then to some batshit about "materially altered video" - ending with the profoundly daft "cgi overlay". Each claim offering jack to back it up!
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,726
    Likes Received:
    1,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing to see here folks.
    Same crap as the last 100 posts.
    Maybe others out here have xray vision but I dont.
    Clearly beta sees things no one else can see,
    He cant even give us a link to the original video to prove up what he claims is factual evidence that he relies upon.

    If any human on this planet can see the core or the penthouse as it moves down the building by all means post it here so I can see it too!

    Another cockamainie debunker theory being posted as facts.

    Pathetic waste of everyones time.

    Especially mine.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2023

Share This Page