The Ongoing Black on White Rape Epidemic

incorrect.

 

19 African slaves arrived at Jamestown in 1619 (brought by Dutch traders) as the first slaves in British America.....

how many of the Jamestown settlers were "black"???

 

NONE!!!!!!

 

Statistics and examples don't demonstrate a relationship. One hundred percent of U.S. presidents who were assassinated were white and 50% of them were lawyers, those statistics (even examples) don't demonstrate that being white has anything to do with being shot. (At most it suggests something about lawyers.)

You basis is flawed. When you look at statistics for a group of people and try to identify something about those people from the statistics you're assuming that a causal attribute exists within that group. Specifically you're assuming that attribute is a result of their being black. It's a meaningless statistical exercise that is about as useful as exploring whether 49er fans have less speeding tickets than Stealer fans. And yes, I agree you've done more meaningless statistical exercises than I have.

... and you're making more assumptions about my motives (and those of dead kids), based on a preconceived model you're trying to fit each of us into. (Which seems to have something to do with black-ness.)

It's not about sympathy. I don't have to have any sympathy at all, to find it disturbing that you say shooting unarmed black kids is funny. I could just be worried about what will tickle your funny bone next.




​

 

Given statistical games....I've got one.....an optimistic one.

Out there in America...despite the large number of white racists....fortunately, they are for the most part... physical cowards. The actual number who engage in violence is small because they are gutless and weak.

Largely, they are big TALKERS on Internet blogs, or within their own little white supremacist/white separatist/neo-Nazi enclaves......dreaming of "armed revolt" and "Nationalist Revolution by Whites against the Bolshevik Multi-Culturalists"....

but safely doing NOTHING but mentally masturbating to dog-eared copies of "The Turner Diaries" or "Civil War-2" by Thomas Chittum.

Only a tiny fraction of them are truly dangerous....and most of those end up in situations typically like .....getting busted by the local sheriff's department in Podunk, Wyoming running a meth lab out of their trailer.

The rest of them fight their "Race War"....with their typing fingers.

 

http://topconservativenews.com/2012/03/americas-first-slave-owner-was-a-black-man/

 

So how does "Top Conservative News" explain the fact that there were NINETEEN black slaves in the all-white Jamestown settlement in 1619.....

but somehow the first slave owner was black and lived in 1654?

 

The statistics I gave were given to simply establish that black men do commit a disproportionately high amount of interracial rape and sexual assault against white women, with virtually no rape/sexual assault taking place against black women by white men. I threw out several possible explanations as to why this disparity exists. I never claimed it was simply "because they are black". I asked whether genetic research, which has been done in the past, could explain, at least in part, the impulsive actions committed by blacks, who demonstrate a high amount of violent criminality in general. I also suggested cultural reasons as to why this disparity exists. Maybe you should re-read what I wrote, because you seem to be fabricating again.

 

Covers all this bases....he can BOTH claim that blacks are "naturally...and culturally criminals".


But the question he always refuses to answer is...."If so...what do you want DONE about them???"

(Because we all, including Brewskier, know what his real answer would be. He just can't say it publicly...not on this blog. Maybe over at Stormfront or American Renaissance)

 

So interracial violence is preferable? You'd rather whites start acting like blacks and commit more murders and rapes? You seem to have contempt and disrespect for the peaceful white majority in the country in your defense of violent black criminals. What, exactly, are you advocating, Gorn?

And I wonder how brave you are outside of the 12 hours a day you post here on PF? I wouldn't call copy pasting talkingpointsmemo articles over to be a real courageous warrior act in your fight against Republicans and capitalism, Gorn.

 

Oh, don't worry about me, I do fine. But I do wonder how a feminist liberal female like yourself is able to not pay attention to tens of thousands of rapes occurring by black men. I guess black skin overrules feminism in the left-wing sphere.

 

Nat Turner was revolting against people who raped, killed and enslaved his people. Wouldn't you revolt against that?

- - - Updated - - -

I bet you guess about a lot of things. So far everything I've seen you guess about has been WRONG!

 

Take a break from Democrat party cheerleading and learn some history, Gorn

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_colonial_United_States
.

 

Which is about as meaningful as comparing statistics that cross incidence of tax evasion with favorite hocky team or offering explanations on why fans of your team are less likely to commit that crime. In 2005.

And when you start with the assumption that there is a difference between group A (defined as black) and group B (defined as white) you've already gone down the "because they are black" pathway. If you honestly wanted to explore any of those genetic or cultural reasons you came up with afterwards you would have started with statistics based on those genetic or cultural distinctions. The title of this thread wouldn't contain the words 'black' and 'white.'




​

 

I wasn't "advocating" for anything. I was stating my opinion that fortunately....most (almost all) white racists are gutless COWARDS.

Very few actually belong to "militias" because they are too scared of being arrested by the "white guilt FBI" (or whatever)...and thus never reach the stage of terrorist violence. Some...sure....but they are quickly squashed and thrown into prison where they can be the "wife" of some other Aryan Nation guy for 20 years.

Many are cowards ...rhetorically. Going "right up to the edge" in their racism....but still trying to talk in "code words" and "hints" and "well, we all know what needs to be done, don't we"......but no further because they are moral cowards who while full of hate and bile......know if they admit it publicly, they won't be defended by those who can otherwise be apologists for racism if they're given enough "vagueness".

So I had no "advocacy"....but a message of hope. One that, despite what we see on the Internet......we have not real fear from white racists. Soon even the Party that if not welcomes them...politely ignores them......will abandon them and reject them. (See my new OP and Rand Paul).

BTW one can support Republicanism and capitalism...and not support racism. But interesting you don't seem to think that???

 

Why? The crime is occurring between blacks and whites, and that is where the disparity exists. Your hyperbole about comparisons is nonsense because there has been actual research conducted into the possible explanations for why we see a high amount of violent criminality from blacks.

Just face the facts, you're just too politically correct to really engage in this topic in any meaningful way. Perhaps you'd save some face by just accepting that and bowing out.​

 

Yes, they were TREATED as indentured servants. But they were not indentured servants.

Indentured servants VOLUNTEERED to be indentured servants.

No matter how they were treated....they were slaves.

 

You seem to be under the impression that unless people are out there killing people and burning down cities they are "cowards". By that same logic, I can say that socialists in this country and on this site are largely cowards as well. They seem to rely on advancing their agenda politically instead of through violence. Are they cowards too, Gorn?

Sure, but not you. That clearly hasn't been your agenda since finding your way onto the site.

- - - Updated - - -

It wasn't legally recognized as slavery. They were to be released after 7 years. It's interesting that the first person that became a permanent slave was owned by a black man.

 

I must run. Brewskier, thanks for my laugh of the day. You really are funny in a sad, pathetic kind of way. Bye.:icon_pee:

 

Now, wait just a minute. You see a correlation between being poor and being stupid. So you attribute being stupid to the cause of being poor. So, someone who is poor is stupid BECAUSE they are poor. Wouldn't the opposite be, in fact, more likely? That they are poor BECAUSE they are stupid? See, one of those conclusions makes sense, and one doesn't. A smart person can figure out how to make money easier than a stupid person can. That seems pretty obvious. But you're saying that when egg meets sperm, they compare bank accounts to see how smart the resulting individual will be. G.T.F.O.

 

Brewskier.... I was calling white racists cowards.....why are you concerned about them and what I call them????

I attack racism...and you bring up "the Democratic agenda." Obviously you think Democrats attack racism....while Republicans do not. Okay...if you want it that way.

Do slaves "volunteer" like indentured servants did? If not...they were slaves. A child born into slavery in 1860 wasn't a "permanent" slave since they were freed by 1865.....does that mean they "weren't a slave"???

BTW, I guess we know that "conservative" as in "Top Conservative News"...stands for slavery apologists.

 

No it is not. The crime is occurring between a victim and a criminal. That you see it as occurring between two groups of people is a fiction that exists only in your mind. There was no great meeting of "black" people, there was no plan of action voted on by members of "black," certified by the "black" rulers and the crime was not implemented by "black" agents. "Black" did not commit the crime, "white" was not the victim.

Trying to attribute the crimes of some people who have black skin to this artificial and non-existent collective of "blacks" is about as reasonable as arguing society is being assaulted by "reds" because an unusually high number of speeding tickets was issued to people wearing red shirts. In 2005.

... and again you've made assumptions about me that are not true. Is it even possible for you to focus on what I am saying or must every one of your posts include failed attempts to classify the person you're talking to according to some prejudged model of who you'd like them to be?







​

 

Dodge.

Not all Democrats. Some wouldn't live within 50 miles of minorities and choose exclusively white suburbs like "Cestus-III", yet still claim to love diversity.

"The first Africans to be brought to English North America landed in Virginia in 1619. These individuals appear to have been treated as indentured servants, and a significant number of enslaved Africans even won their freedom through fulfilling a work contract or for converting to Christianity.[19] Some successful free people of color, such as Anthony Johnson, acquired slaves or indentured servants themselves. To many historians, notably Edmund Morgan, this evidence suggests that racial attitudes were much more flexible in 17th century Virginia than they would subsequently become.[20] A 1625 census recorded 23 Africans in Virginia. In 1649 there were 300, and in 1690 there were 950.[21]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_colonial_United_States

Again, it wasn't until Anthony Johnson's court battle did it become a legal institution.

 

So you're arguing that groups of people don't exist because they are made up of individuals? This post is a great example of the kind of tortured logic that people who are afflicted by political correctness employ. It's like a straight jacket around the logic of your argument... so stifling.

Do you think black people see themselves as part of a group, generally?

 

Why do you care if I call white racists COWARDS???? Gutless yellow punks who talk a lot but fortunately are no real threat to this country....just "keyboard commandos"?

I think they are....and their actions tend to prove it.