The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

That's because a discussion can only take place between 2 or more people, so if you don't go for the bait (my questions), I can't follow up.

The first 2 are correct, the 3rd is false. I'm assuming you have no intention of honestly answering my questions but I could be wrong and that would be unusual for you. I fully intended to respond honestly (I always do) had you answered them but I see all you want to do is evade and that is dishonest in itself because you are spending an awful lot of time with this evasive line of discussion.

Correct (with respect to #1 and #2), and a couple of other posters I don't even bother with because they're simply trolls, nothing more, nothing less.

If that's your opinion it goes back to my assessment of your (dis)honesty. So I'm ok with your pretenses, they don't move me.

 

Poor Bobbie has been trolling all along.
He enters his opinion, regardless how preposterous, and if you don't agree, it is you who is trolling.
He refuses to answer any questions about the statements he makes.

 

Wrong. You have no intention of discussing my answers honestly as your following quote indicates.

Like I said. You're just trolling.

 

Non sequitur, you're just being evasive. For all that useless verbiage you could have simply just answered the questions, the usual phony crap from you.

 

Give it up Bob, You're a phony.

Spewing your garbage. and refusing to answer up for what you say.

 

Useless verbiage? Do you just like to hear yourself talk?

You've openly just admitted that you think my responses are dishonest (even before I post them), you don't care what I believe, and just use them as "discussion bait". Why would I bother to answer your questions when the responses I provide will mean nothing to you? Pure stupidity on your part to expect an answer after openly admitting all that.

How can anyone expect you to honestly discuss a response when you have a preconceived opinion that anything that someone responds to you is going to be a lie/dishonest and that you couldn't care less about what they believe?

Take you're faked "honest discussion" rhetoric elsewhere. You're only here to "honestly discuss" with people that share your beliefs and way of thinking and troll the people who do not share the same beliefs/way of thinking you have.

 

Why? You don't care, remember Bobby?

This coming from the guy who admits he asks question of people yet doesn't care what they believe and thinks the answer are always going to be dishonest anyways. Talk about phony...

Look in the mirror Bobby.

 

Any reason you are refusing to address post #1173? Afraid to address the contradiction you have created when you said 757 pilots were quoted as saying that the Hani maneuvers would have been impossible for even them to perform yet PFFFTTTTT folks said they could have performed them?

 

Are you telling me that the article written and posted at the PFFFFTTTT site regarding the plane's/Hani's maneuvers is a lie as it contradicts what you say?

 

What happened Scott? Are you ever going to address post #1116? It's bad enough that you admitted that they got the plane wrong by at least 20%. Had to have been a mistake somewhere. Makes the rest of that analysis suspect. Whomever did it couldn't even get the perspective correct.

 

To use a quote from you:

Your questions are useless and garbage because you've admitted you don't care about what people believe/think and you think they're dishonest anyways.

 

Anyone can see that you're deliberately misrepresenting what I said to muddy the waters.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-56#post-1069625366
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-55#post-1069618460

I'm just getting tired of debating with people who obviously don't even believe their own arguments and are just trying to muddy the waters to confuse the viewers.

http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
https://karmayogadaily.com/2012/09/...-confessions-of-a-paid-disinformation-poster/


He showed a side shot of the plane but if it's at about a fifty degree angle the length would be about twenty percent shorter. I didn't say he'd gotten it wrong by twenty percent and you know it.

 

Endless useless garbage not worth addressing => evasions. Answer the questions, they are legitimate, and depending on the answers we'll see if there's an intelligent adult discussion to be had with you. I'm anticipated more evasions though and that's ok, those are also answers of a type.

 

What a bunch of garbage you've posted! Depending on the answers!? You've already made up your mind about my responses as you've admitted AND have had to be reminded about time and time again.

"Depending on the answers" my arse! You don't care what I believe Bobby. That makes your questions useless.



Who are you trying to kid anyways?

 

Right!

He used the wrong view of the plane and thus got the scale wrong by 20%! Why did he use a side shot of the plane instead of a plane shown at 50 degree angle? Why did he deliberately misrepresent the plane view?

Not very honest eh Scott?

 

Are you for real?

He got the horizontal scale wrong by 20% because he deliberately used a side view instead of a plane shown at 50 degrees. That's "getting it wrong by 20%".

Geez. I can't believe i have to explain this to you.

 

Scott, you asked me for a link to the Pentagon videos on the Coste presentation which I provided? ... comments? ...

 

Cute emoji Gam, does it help with something or are you just reverting to your grade school days? For me it just looks like your continuing series of evasions, albeit very juvenile this time. Sorry bro but I'm done with this line of worthless discussion. Either answer the questions or write another post I can use, none of this is useful to me. Cartoons are for kiddies, grow the **** up, I know you're capable.

 

Nope, your question are useless as has been pointed out. I'm done also. I've made my point about you and your fake "honest debate" rhetoric.

 

I believe I more or less said that what was presented was inconclusive and that it was moot anyway as a 757 couldn't fit in the space behind the gate-lifting mechanism.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-51#post-1069610494


(1:55:30)

 

where did you say that? ... and why are you posting Pearl Harbor again? ... did you see in Coste's vids that New Pearl Harbor has a huge mistake in it? ...

 

You mean like you posting a picture that uses the side view of a plane to mislead viewers instead honestly using the picture of a plane at it's true angle?

 

It's been buried my so much nonsense that I will quote Bob again ... watch the vids Scott ... I would like to see if you can make it past the first few minutes of chapter 1 ... Bob obviously couldn't ... once the confirmation bias ends, the truthers scramble ...

 

Unfortunately I will respond to this dishonest post. You'll never find the word "debate" in any of my posts (other than to correct false claims about me) because I don't debate. I never have and never will. A debate is a game of sorts where there is an anticipated winner and a loser. I don't post in any forum for the purpose of debating. I'm not here to play games. I discuss, share ideas and information, plain and simple, especially about 9/11. So the above could not possibly be any kind of "rhetoric" that comes from me.

 

That's 100% false. It's YOU who can't make it past Chapter 1. I've told you multiple times that you can pick and choose anything from any of the videos to discuss and all YOU have been bringing up is Chapter 1. I started with the Preface, then Chapter 1 myself as listed in the points I wanted to discuss because when one discusses something with multiple chapters, one usually goes in the order presented. I'm still open to discussing any of the other Chapters if you bring up something you want discussed other than the Preface and Chapter 1.