The Silent War Against The White Race.

Our 'friend' thought that we supported the persecution and lynching of blacks. I told him the opposite is true, he now proclaims it denial.

 

white students went from 56.9% in 1990 to 33.3% in 2005.

http://racerelations.about.com/od/t...tsfromAffirmativeActionsBaninUniversities.htm

 

The playing field is level. It's not the fields fault that one team can't get their (*)(*)(*)(*) together. You're just in favor of Marxist equal results. Sorry - in our society, people who work hard to get ahead get more than those who drop out and smoke dope all day.

They are much, much more likely to be killed by one of their fellow "homies" while wearing a hoodie. How nice of you to reference a Hispanic on black crime, though. Many on the left like to think of Zimmerman as a white man, and not the Hispanic Democrat that he is.

Another hackneyed quip, what a surprise.

 

Your link also goes on to state that relocation is a large part of the reason. And as one on your side noted, Caucasian-Americans have suffered a great deal in terms of live births. I don't want to get into my reasoning on that here, that in of itself is another off topic discussion.

Your link also shows that there's a plausibility in our thoughts, as African-Americans shrunk in higher education because of the AA Lift.

 

Last I checked, Jewishness is a religious belief, not a race. I, (or you) could become Jews, though it's not easy.

 

despite your ignorance, media "exposes" are not going to fix the problem.LOL. This is a very difficult problem, because it is nearly impossible to change someone's culture from the outside. These are highly entrenched values, that will not go away any time soon. The culture is the result of a multitude of factors (ranging from chronic gang violence and societal abandonment to a history of families being broken up going back to the days of slavery). The only way to fix is from the inside out--through direct investment in these communities. This includes resources for police, schools, housing, etc. If we turn these communities around, then that will do a lot more to change the culture, than your idiotic idea of media "exposes."

Jews make up less than 1% of the population and yet, they are about 10% of Berkeley. This also means that the non-Jew white population is even smaller.

 

sure relocation is part of it. But you can't explain going from 57 to 33 by relocation alone. The main point is that AA doesn't hurt whites. And race-based admissions may actually help white students. This data is certainly consistent with that.

 

We could call it even by stating the evidence is inconclusive, or in other words when we get rid of AA on a nationwide basis, only then we can tell the difference. Which *should* be the goal anyway.

But the Leftist "progressive" side ironically won't allow themselves to progress to this State.

 

Predictable. More wealth redistribution to Democrat voters. Pass. There's more Government money spent per capita in Washington DC than anywhere else in the country, and it remains one of the highest crime areas in the country.

And the breakup of the black family does not go all the way back to slavery like you falsely assert. Prior to the 1960's War on Poverty, only 25% of blacks were born outside of wedlock. Today it is close to 75%. Illegitimacy became a big problem after the Government allowed men to leave their parental responsibilities when they wanted to, knowing the Government will step in and pay for the mother and the kid with taxpayer dollars.

Ok. What's your point?

 

actually, many would argue that the Berkeley "experiment" is a good argument for why AA is important. Because without AA, you end up with a class consisting entirely of Jews, Asians and rich whites. And in the future, our country will be run entirely by these three groups. Maybe you think that's a good thing. But others might disagree.

 

Actually, I think they've done surprisingly well for people who "can't get their (*)(*)(*)(*) together". Our President for two terms might agree with that, I think.

Just shows what you can do if you put your mind to it and work for your goals, instead of (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing about the "war against your race" all day

 

At the risk of having more labels placed on me(which I don't care about anyway, since if i was looking for love and kisses I would be out saving the whales or something), I would like to explain to you why this is.

To understand this will not be hard for you, since you are along the right lines with your cultural Marxism comments before.

Ask yourself this. Who ARE the dominant culture in the US today? Not the most numerical(that means nothing). The most dominant. To discover the answer to this, we must ask a further questions.

Can you criticise your Gov without fear of any blowback? Yes we can, we do it every time in the mainstream media, you can say anything you like about your Gov or PM(or President). You can even go way OTT and be personally nasty.

Can you criticise whites? Yes of course, indeed it has been turned into a sport.

Can you criticise Muslims? Why yes you can, indeed not only criticise but your Gov have murdered near on millions of them, in the past couple of decades alone. And are plotting right now to murder more.

Can you criticise Christians? Sure. Indeed, Christians(like whites) can be criticised, mocked, slandered, and degraded, on television, in the media etc.

Can you criticise blacks? Well, less so than the others but yes we can, esp if your criticisms are evidenced and even supported by certain intelligent blacks who also can see how crap their own culture has gone(and want to improve it).

It is Jews and ONLY Jews who you cannot criticise, least not with a mountain of heat that follows. It is Jews and ONLY Jews who the media do not even raise a voice of dissent to(because they own most of it!).

Who does your Gov really work and act for? Do they really work for the betterment of white Americans? Clearly they do not. Do your Gov work for the benefit of blacks in America or outwith? Well, despite what else has been said, no they do not.

Do your Gov work for the and on behalf of Christians in the US? They most certainly do not, despite them cynically exploiting them.
Your Gov work and act for the furtherment of Jewry and ONLY Jewry.

Why? Because your Gov is full of Jews, your parties are both financed by Jews, so is it any wonder that the rest of the World(and many non Jewish americans), scratch their heads in confusion, and just don't see why the US has to be Israel's attack dog and cash cow.

Well they don't need to be confused. I've just laid it all, and it is true. They can deny it, but the evidence is so overwhelming you would have to be a Jew or be ignorant not to see it.

Biden (your doughnut VP), he stood up just a couple of months ago and said the Jews were at the forefront for open borders into the US for third world immigration.

Biden said it, and not ONE Jewish org complained about that statement(which they would if they did not like it).
It would be fair for ANY American or European to ask - why don't these Jews work for third world immigration into Israel? Why not open and free borders into Israel?

Why not? Because they know that if this happened there would be no Jewish state, no Jewish culture there, no Jewish Gov's there, they know that their schools would no longer be Jewish schools, and so on.

 

Actually, this in of itself touches on another Leftist-base: Radical Feminism. Truth be told, not all "men" wanted to leave their parental responsibilities

http://www.fathersrightsinc.com/wmlifc.htm#sthash.775UHCdl.dpbs

They're forced out.

 

There's a lot of money spent by NYC, and it's one of the lowest crime areas. You have to do it the NYC way, not the DC way.

that just reflects a societal trend. Prior to the 1960's, 25% was a large number, comparatively, because almost all children were born in wedlock. It represents the empowerment of women in the workplace, which has made divorce much more common. Blacks have always had issues with family cohesion that does trace back to slavery.

 

I agree with a lot of this, but no, we cannot openly criticize blacks, gays, Hispanics, or any group that is protected by the progressive establishment and its media. Not without a huge outcry and backlash. The left in this country (and in Europe) is building an assemblage of groups who all share minority status in the hopes of one day being numerically superior to the dominant group. At that point the US will become a socialist nation. They protect these groups from criticism from the majority.

 

AA is based on race not class. Besides the country/ West will be run by which ever race breeds the fastest considering thats all that matters to anti whites. Looking at world demographics that'll be Africans, Arabs and Indians. Theres over 80m born into poverty every year, countries in poverty breed damn, children are like their assets. If whites arent allowed to remain majorities in their own countries then they will be replaced, they'll have no self destiny that is the reality of it. So then one needs to look around the world and ask, which country/ countries around the world will it resemble? Its funny everyone wants to live in white Western countries but they dont care if whites disappear. Yet no other ethnic group has to or is giving up their countries to the fastest breeders not because their racists, NO they're never accused of that. Only Whites are.

Ive got friends of all different races, i cant say one of them that wants to see demographics change dramatically. They know what and why they choose to live where they do. Maybe its only those i befriend since they assimilate and have thick skin unlike the Marxists. But obvious the crime stats do show many dont like whites and many like yourself want them to disappear, id have nothing in common with morons like that so very unlikely to befriend them. If they cant respect my people why should i respect them?

 

Yes, the affirmative action white guilt President. Hooray!

That's ironic, considering nobody does that more than black people.

 

If by "openly criticize" you mean express your hateful racist views, then no--you cannot do that anymore. thankfully.

 

How's that? By not having over a 50% black population?

The point is that it's disingenuous to blame slavery for the break down of the black family. Blacks were much, much more family oriented prior to the 1960's War on Poverty. The illegitimacy that affects them most of all and is causing so many problems is largely a recent phenomenon.

 

Your definition of "hateful racist views" is not the same as mine.

 

yes, but there are other admissions policies that are based on class (ie, legacy)

That's not true. Jews don't breed particularly quickly, and they control many powerful American institutions, despite being less than 1% of the population. Don't worry dude, there will always be a significant population of whites in this country. The only difference is that the domination of whites over other races won't be what it once was. Sorry.

- - - Updated - - -

of course not. You're a racist. To you, racist views are just known as...views.

 

Your labeling is meaningless and ineffective. If someone went on the news and gave out valid statistics on black crime, I would support them as being factual representations of reality. You would dismiss them as "hateful racist views".

One thing I find ironic, you intentionally selected a username that would be offensive to Christians, Jews, and anybody who believed in God. That's your position, and you don't care how these people view you for it. Using the same logic, I could pick the username blackscommitthemostcrime. You'd get on a moral high horse about it. Left-wing hypocrisy is astounding.

 

NYC has 25% blacks. That's significant. And NYCs black neighborhoods are certainly better than those in DC.

It's equally disingenuous to claim that slavery played no part in the development of modern black culture. It is a combination of slavery in association with a larger societal movement away from traditional marriage, that has resulted in illegitimacy. You can't just ignore the slavery part.

 

Except for one.

 

Again, you've no idea what being "hateful" or "racist" really is. Let's be totally specific and go through it line by line.

Blacks: The complaint is about the Welfare State, the violence and the seeming disposition to it. It's been documented, proven and even African-Americans have attested that they don't want this to continue(well, a significant minority anyway but still, there's been some interracial protest to their inner madness).

Nothing hateful about that, we'd like nothing more than for some actual improvement.

Gays: To me, this is a social issue. This is a *heterosexual country*, by its very tenant there are more heteros than not. By forcing gays out into the open, you immediately create tension through your false beliefs on "tolerance"(which means to put up). Tolerance will only lead to escalated violence in the end. New-Leftism is flawed on its presumptions on social identity and culture.

So, what's the solution? I support Civil Unions but not marriages. Why force Hetero churches to marry gays, in opposition to their religious, spiritual and moral views? How "tolerant" is that of New-Leftists?

The other problem, is the attention that they bring to themselves. You literally do not see others engage in a public manner, or at the very least not in front of people. Chanting for their "rights". Most of which are economic in principle, really.

But do people hate "gays" on the account of their being "gay"? Of course not. Give Humans more credit, any *lack* of tolerance has been throughout history because of an opposing viewpoint to one's own way of living. In other words,its an animalistic trait.

Hispanics: Much like with Gays, any opposition comes from the illegal immigration, the drug and gun violence that's taking the lives of kids. It also comes from the fact that as a social group, they're not all that likely to provide any social or economic benefits to the Homeland.

If you notice my socio-theories here on what has occurred, you'll realize there's a rational, non-"hateful" reason for opposition throughout history.

You'll also notice New-Leftism is generally wrong, and always has been. We need to clean up the mess behind their childish revolution.