The truth about 'human shields'. MOD ALERT

Sure it does. Your just in denial. Same with the US for that matter if we are talking "supporters of terrorism". Just as there were courts that wanted to charge IDF commanders with war crimes, there was also a court that wanted to charge Bush with war crimes.

Now you will probably argue that terrorism is different than war crimes, but in general they are the same. Especially in the case of Israel where they commit acts of terror on such a regular basis.

 

You could drop a bomb on knuckleb's neighbor and he would deny it happened.

 

Nobody is discussion your weekend recreation.... what you do behind closed doors is your business....

 

No... but you would be the first to blame Israel and tell everyone about your discovery of WP LUMPS....

Then YOU and moonpie would talk about it for the next fifteen years while inventing hundreds of pallykids allegedly killed in the blast.

I'm NOT the fiction writer, what I post is substantiated with reliable factual information. Your limitations relating to comprehension and reality are your concern.... not mine.

 

You're referring to the
[h=2]Chemical Weapons Convention[/h] From the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons?

If so.... you need to go ask whoever told you WP is prohibited to show you where. My copy does not mention White Phosphorous or even the term incendiary at all in the entire document.

Do you actually think other members here are stupid enough to accept your outright lies and fabrications without question? Prove me wrong... Page number or even Article Number would suffice.

It's a bunch easier than explaining magical White Phosphorous Lumps.... You say it's there, the text is readily available and it's written in English.

Put up or shut up time....

I'll not hold my breath waiting for an honest response, I don't want to strain you.

 

"A war crime is a serious violation of the laws applicable in armed conflict (also known as international humanitarian law) giving rise to individual criminal responsibility. Examples of war crimes include "murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps," "the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war," the killing of prisoners, "the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity."

"The FBI defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives.” "

Not the same.

 

You mean you don't recognise ' insulting and attacking ' when it's US of AIPAC ' insulting and attacking ' In the light of such behaviour shouldn't you be asking yourself.......' Wtf am I saying ' ?

 

More Gulliver's Travels! The AIPAC of Lilliput!

 

Because they are the "Goyim", like the rest of humanity, like non-Jewsih Americans.

The Goyim were created (according to some prominent Rabbis, like Ovadia Yosef) to serve the superior "Jewish masters".

We are all Palestinians now, but there are a lot of "useful idiots", who call themselves "Christian Zionists", and that is the reason why the Hollywood, FED, Big Media and the foreign policy of the USA is owned by radical Jewish racists, who call themselves Zionists!

In a nutshell:
The power of the Israel Lobby is due to the stupidity of many Goyims, and the "superiority" of Jews becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

But, nevertheless, you cannot bribe everybody and you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.

Despite the "Jewish power", based on the "Holocaust Industry", the average punter all over the world loves Germany more than any other country, and that means that he does not hate Germans, despite the 7x24 anti-German propaganda.

On the other hand, the average punter hates Israel, and that means that he does not love the Jews, despite the 7x24 pro-Jewsih propaganda.

 

And equally pathetic reading about mistaken people who list them but when asked to prove them can't come up with any court ruling stating they are just that, only allegations and accusations.

But no court proof of any kind, just allegations and accusations.

Determined by which qualified court?

Determined by which qualified court? Israel states it was used a cover for operations against what was reported to be a Hamas position, what did the prosecution say and what did the Judge rule?

Date please and location.

I say please give me the proof from a qualified court that this actually happened the way you slant it.

I can. They are not as you say they are as they have not been proved in any qualified court so, are not deemed illegal by those who are impartial.

 

The Goldstone Report will be acted upon sooner or later- despite the US of AIPAC running interference for its client fascists. The war crimes charges against Israel are quite specific.

Of course, you are eagerly anticipating the day when Israelis can stand before the courts and defend themselves ?

 

Just hope that you can invent more countries prior to getting Goldstone himself to testify!

Reconsidering the Goldstone Report on Israel and war crimes
By Richard Goldstone,April 01, 2011

X 10

 

Well, it always depends on who are the criminals and who are their victims.

Do not forget, there are the "Chosen" and there are "the Goyim", and there are always two different standards applied to these two categories of Homo Sapiens.

According to some prominent Jewish Rabbis, the Goyim are not even human.

And if they are not human, how can we talk about human lives and human rights?

The Zionists claim that the Apartheid Wall, created on the Palestinian land, is good, because he saves "human life".

It is obvious that more humans died in Palestine after the creation of this Apartheid Wall.

But if we remember, what they mean with "human life", then we can understand that the non-Jewish life does not count.

 

You're the expert on insulting and attacking as better than half your posts are obviously made with that intent.... I'm certain it will bother you to know you are as good at that as you are at providing FACTUAL information.... in other words, I know why you selected your name, just a big dead rock steered by an outside entity floating through space.

 

Yeah sure..... Work, Education and Constructive use of energy has nothing to do with success.

Every modern society has their children living in squalor and spending their days throwing rocks at people and tanks....

BTW, please explain why one would give a damn about a popularity poll run by a television network. I guess in your world it's like American Idol for nations.... the nation with the most popularity votes gets a recording contract?


Makes perfect sense, if you're a total idiot.

 

I read the link which clearly reiterates what all sentient beings surely recognise, namely that the use of WP against civilians- that's real flesh and blood human beings - is illegal. You are an apologist for the use of WP against civilians - repugnant.

 

Goldstone didn't alter his report. It remains intact. So then, you are eagerly anticipating Israel's appearance in the dock so that it can defend itself against these vile charges of war crimes ?

 

Once again we're back to providing PROOF that use of white phosphorous is illegal, as I asked moon.

You jumped in with your little porkie trying to support your comrade in lies but failed miserably. Wanna try again?

The statement was Use of WP is illegal.... provide proof of that statement. Not proving the cost of living in Outer Mongolia, Not proving that a rock will not penetrate armor, not proving the price of tea in China.


The statement was made, simply prove it true.

You may have selected a tough row to hoe as the statement is completely false, as you will discover if you actually pursue the knowledge.

Now however we have a statement YOU made that I'm going to hold your feet to the fire on... got your asbestos socks?

YOUR COMMENT:

"You are an apologist for the use of WP against civilians..."

Show me one comment supporting that. Just one.

You can backtrack and retract it or be proved without a doubt to be a LIAR. Your choice and your reputation.

What you did was resort to the favored discussion tool of the ignorant... when in doubt INSULT and make baseless allegations. Nice demonstration, I'll use it in my book. Thanks

 

Ignoramuses are ignored. Well done.

 

For the benefit of other readers, the use of WP against civilians is self-evidently illegal:

"The munitions are “not prohibited under international law, but they are not supposed to be used in civilian areas”, MEANING THAT THE USE OF WHITE PHOSPHROUS IN CIVILIAN AREAS IS PROHIBITED UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. Finally, Israel maintains it “did not violate international law.”

The question one might find oneself asking after reading this is: Did Israel use the munitions in civilian areas, or not? We know the answer. So, then, why cannot Kershner bother herself to tell her readers that there is no question that Israel did in fact use the munitions in civilian areas? Why does she decline to point out to her readers that, by doing so, IT IS AN INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT THAT ISRAEL VIOLATED INTERNATIONAL LAW WITH ITS USE OF WHITE PHOSPHROUS".

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com...-white-phosphorus-during-operation-cast-lead/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Frmdu-Gqh8E&feature=youtube_gdata_player. HRW addresses Israels illegal use of white phosphorous.

 

Of course the use of WP on civilians is illegal. Only ignaramouses and/or apologists for illegalities that result in the deaths of civilians do so in their attempts to defend the indefinsible actions of the pariah Israeli state.

 

Again the discredited HRW speaks out....

I seem to recall a handful of questions raised regarding HRW's veracity. Something about their observers seeing the location of bursts of WP shells from TEN MILES away and strange unexplainable LUMPS of White Phosphorous found TWO DAYS later.

I'll see if I can find the time to dig-up Big Stu's Quick Lube, Dog Manicure Salon, Fried Chicken and Human Rights Monitor Emporium site. Stu's has more real credibility than HRW as they are self funded AND have never been caught fabricating reports.

 

Okay, enough of the flaming, trolling and personal attacks.

The thread is now closed.