The vaccine causes deadly blood clots.

The vaccine causes deadly blood clots.​

~ We know. The evidence is becoming overwhelming — mostly from countries other than the USA.
mRNA vaccine should be on magazine covers the world over as "Public Enemy #1 " .

 

If the info is so clear and it will "make me look silly"(meh!) then Show me one verified fact in it that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it!

 

Here's some more stuff on blood clots.
https://www.brighteon.com/new-searc...est_result&type=all&quality=all&channelPage=1

 

A dumping ground link with not a single verified fact in any of the misinformation videos. Your objectivity is zero and you are not interested in any debate. Nobody dumps 50 odd videos expecting honest debate. That is a troll tactic.

 

I linked to this post from another thread in post #13...
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...sed-from-prison.603801/page-4#post-1073918790

...in which I said I personally knew three people who got blood clots shortly after having gotten the vaccine which seems to be consistent with what those videos say.
Here's what you said.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...es-deadly-blood-clots.606446/#post-1073923101

You've refused to directly respond to the info in the videos. You didn't address the info in this post satisfactorily in which some experts say that medical journals are under the same control that the media are under..
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...es-deadly-blood-clots.606446/#post-1073925453

It's pretty clear that you're the one who doesn't want to debate.

 

Bullshit hearsay. Not only are you not a credible source but you have no idea about the honesty of these people, their motives etc. or the correlation. You have not identified the extent of the "clots" or whether it was short term. Covid-19 itself is a major cause of blood clotting!

How Could a COVID Vaccine Cause Blood Clots? - Scientific American
"Six individuals out of nearly seven million people who have gotten this vaccine in the U.S. developed the condition, which appears to be similar to one seen in just a few cases among people who received the AstraZeneca vaccine in Europe, which is described in the story below."

"Even so, the clotting disorder—described today in two reports in The New England Journal of Medicine— is so uncommon that the benefits of the vaccine still outweigh its risks, EMA executive director Emer Cooke told reporters. “These are very rare side effects,” she said. “The risk of mortality from COVID is much greater than the risk of mortality from these side effects.”"

Show me one verified fact in any one of them that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it! You have consistently failed to do this because you cannot do that simple and fundamental thing required to make the data credible.

Why should a clown who says billions are going to die be taken seriously when your only "fact" is that YOU think it is credible? You have zero credibility and neither do your batshit sources,

Pathetic, utterly pathetic. You post a link to a link to a post with nothing but a dozen links in and absolutely zero analytical commentary from you. You also post your previously addressed and multi-spammed crap about Rand that you bafflingly think is proven, thereby making a ludicrously exaggerated generalization across every scientific discipline.

You argue like a child. Instead of dumping your pathetic misinformation links and videos on the forum, show some direct analysis and explain why you find this batshit believable. All you are doing is trolling.

 

Scientific American is a mainstream American publication* so of course anything in there is going to support the official version. The argument is that the mainstream media are lying so posting something from the mainstream media to support your argument isn't going to fool anybody.

That's what the mainstream media and mainstream science journals say. It kind of looks like the major clotting began after the vaccine rollout.

World Premiere: Died Suddenly
https://rumble.com/v1wg2ae-world-premiere-died-suddenly.html?mref=7ju1&mrefc=4

Tsunami of Vax Deaths in Next Two Years – Dr Betsy Eads
https://rumble.com/v20iug4-tsunami-...wo-years-dr-betsy-eads.html?mref=7ju1&mrefc=2


*
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...es-deadly-blood-clots.606446/#post-1073924670

 

Ludicrous circular logic. You aren't the spokesperson for "anybody" and your judgement is the lowest credibility possible.

You are the spokesperson for batshit and have zero research skills. First vaccine Dec 8 2020 in the United Kingdom.

November 2020:
https://labblog.uofmhealth.org/lab-report/new-cause-of-covid-19-blood-clots-identified
“In patients with COVID-19, we continue to see a relentless, self-amplifying cycle of inflammation and clotting in the body,” Kanthi says. “Now we’re learning that autoantibodies could be a culprit in this loop of clotting and inflammation that makes people who were already struggling even sicker.”

April 2021:
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-04-15-risk-rare-blood-clotting-higher-covid-19-vaccines
Researchers at the University of Oxford have today reported that the risk of the rare blood clotting known as cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) following COVID-19 infection is around 100 times greater than normal, several times higher than it is post-vaccination or following influenza.

The study authors, led by Professor Paul Harrison and Dr Maxime Taquet from Oxford University’s Department of Psychiatry and the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, counted the number of CVT cases diagnosed in the two weeks following diagnosis of COVID-19, or after the first dose of a vaccine. They then compared these to calculated incidences of CVT following influenza, and the background level in the general population.

They report that CVT is more common after COVID-19 than in any of the comparison groups, with 30% of these cases occurring in the under 30s. Compared to the current COVID-19 vaccines, this risk is between 8-10 times higher, and compared to the baseline, approximately 100 times higher.

The breakdown comparison for reported cases of CVT in COVID-19 patients in comparison to CVT cases in those who received a COVID-19 vaccine is:

• In this study of over 500,000 COVID-19 patients, CVT occurred in 39 in a million patients.
• In over 480,000 people receiving a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer or Moderna), CVT occurred in 4 in a million.
• CVT has been reported to occur in about 5 in a million people after first dose of the AZ-Oxford COVID-19 vaccine.
• Compared to the mRNA vaccines, the risk of a CVT from COVID-19 is about 10 times greater.
• Compared to the AZ-Oxford vaccine, the risk of a CVT from COVID-19 is about 8 times greater.

 

You're simply ignoring the info I posted about the mainstream media's lying about everything important and the info I posted about science journals' lying too.

Please watch these two videos.

MEDICAL JOURNALS CORRUPT TO THE CORE!
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/medical-journals-corrupt-to-the-core/

Perspectives on the Pandemic | "The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine" | Episode 13 Remastered
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...67C042D4B5EA5B69DA9F0A15&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl=


And while you're at it, watch this one.

Dr Tenpenny and Dr. Lee Merritt - The Medical Industry Has Now Been Weaponized
https://ugetube.com/watch/dr-tenpen...qGPN9GmGgHid51sXwDGu2vb7HDMbtkImVXHsXeW9ys0UA


Please respond again and answer in a way that shows you understand what those videos say. Simply posting stuff from the mainstream is not satisfactory. You're ignoring the fact that the mainstream has a record of lying.

 

This video is relevant to my argument too.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...sed-from-prison.603801/page-4#post-1073918790


This is one of the hotlinks in the above article.

Deep state deception: FEMA bribed father to falsify death certificate in latest covid vaccine cover-up
https://naturalnews.com/2022-10-18-fema-bribery-covid-vaccine-death-certificate-coverup.html


In this situation anything from the mainstream, including medical journals, should be considered a lie until it's been proven true.

 

You are trolling, just dumping batshit videos and failing to offer anything to analyze them!
Show me one verified fact in it that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it! You have consistently failed to do this because you cannot do that simple and fundamental thing required to make the data credible.

Do you even understand what fake news is? Show me anywhere this person saying this publicly. You put up a batshit website, known for lying and deception and fail to check out the story! What the hell would FEMA be doing getting involved in such a thing and in what crazy world would any official organization do this anyway? You are a spreader of misinformation and I am amazed that you are allowed to do this.

What a crock of bullshit. And how exactly does one go about "proving" anything to somebody like you who a) doesn't understand any of it b) automatically dismisses it SIMPLY because it IS mainstream c) automatically believes batshit without making a single effort to corroborate or quantify anything.

See batshit, post batshit!

 

Show me one verified fact in any one of them that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it! You have consistently failed to do this because you cannot do that simple and fundamental thing required to make the data credible.

See batshit post batshit. See bolded above.

Spam, see bolded above. What does this clown have that gives him authority to make any medical claims?

Two clowns and more spam. See bolded above.

Utterly pathetic. You have no logic, no critical thinking, no objectivity and no relevant education. You have no credibility on any of this and your automatic belief of anything batshit is blocking any chance for you to see through your fog of ignorance.

Moronic circular reasoning.

 

As I've told you several times as I did in this post...
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...sed-from-prison.603801/page-4#post-1073918790

...about all I can do is see whose version of things is consistent with what I see happening around me. The alternative version is consistent with what I see and the official version isn't. Do you expect me to track these people down and examine their medical records. Tell us how you would go about verifying what a supposed victim says.

Please look at the info in this post very carefully.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798

 

As I have said numerous times, it is like arguing with a child. You seem unable to grasp that your ridiculous uncorroborated observations have no bearing on the contents of a batshit video. NOWHERE have you verified anything stated in any video you spam. The statement below, made and ignored numerous times asks you to verify any one thing within the crappy videos you gullibly believe. Nowhere have you done this simple thing.

Show me one verified fact in any one of them that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it! You have consistently failed to do this because you cannot do that simple and fundamental thing required to make the data credible.

Is the victim medically qualified. Does the reporter have any ulterior motive for what they are doing. Does the victim make this statement elsewhere. Do you understand what the following mean - coincidence, irrelevant conclusions, false assumptions, fake news, correlation and causation?

Show me one verified fact in any one of them that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it!

 

Which part of my "look at the info" response was confusing for you? Oh, all of it, since you damn well ignored the whole thing!

Original response

 

Then it's not verifiable. If it's not verifiable, it's not automatically a lie. It may, or may not be true. I know this. I'm leaning toward the alternative version because I've seen some of it first hand. People I know well tell me stuff they've seen first hand.


Here's a doctor who started out being pro-vaccine and did an about-face when he was seeing first hand that what was happening wasn't consistent with the official version.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra and Steve Kirsch - The Best Available Evidence
https://ugetube.com/watch/dr-aseem-...-best-available-evidence_DbJ7zc13jTkWNbe.html

Tell us what you think of him.

Your original response is about the moon missions. What I asked you to look at carefully in post #38 is about how the mainstream media lie about almost everything. Please give us your analysis of the info in that link.

 

MEH! Look at this guy! You can apply that exact same statement above to every one of his spam by numbers repertoire. None of them can be verified, they all come from sources that are renowned for fake-news and sites that sell "alternative" crap. He bases his entire case on the accounts of a few people he "knows" yet none of these can be verified, correlated or confirmed.

I doubt you have the honesty or integrity to read this very thorough examination of the man's claims:
“I know you are, but what am I?” Dr. Asseem Malhotra rails against COVID-19 “misinformation” | Science-Based Medicine (sciencebasedmedicine.org)
"Even worse is that Dr. Malhotra’s “scientific review” is now being amplified by the quack tycoon who before the pandemic had already built a net worth north of $100 million selling quackery and antivax propaganda, Joe Mercola, on his Substack, where he repeats the antivaccine tropes in Dr. Malhotra’s papers quite fluidly, given that they’ve all been parroted before on his website and he knows them well.

This should tell you nearly all of what you need to know about Dr. Malhotra’s “two-part scientific review,” not that that will stop me from explaining in detail why this “review” is a fake scientific review weaponized as disinformation."

Irrelevant. My response was to your post! HERE - I notice yet again you run away from directly addressing it:

I'm impressed, Scott (et al.) has bolstered this small section of his wall of spam with a few more dumb youtube videos! I went through it many years ago:-

Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax: Whistleblowers, governments and lies. (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)

Scott/cosmored etc. Tell me any part of that you think is wrong. (see what I did? Dump a wall back at you and ask you to address it!).

If any of that link fails to respond to any of your spam, kindly identify which bits:
Then show me one verified fact in any one of them that needs addressing. Tell the "viewers" how you verified it!

 

Will you lot stop posting twaddle from the “disinformation dozen”

The so called “Children’s Health Defense” is responsible for a lot of preventable child deaths

https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html

 

You haven't responded to it directly. You're tap dancing around it.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...at-the-lies-furiously.583345/#post-1072353798

That info seems to have you checkmated. You keep posting mainstream info with the attitude that the mainstream never lies and what it says closes the whole case. It doesn't lie about everything but it generally gives people an upside-down view of what's happening in the world. Tell us what you think of mainstream news. How often do you think it lies?

 

I've responded to most of your wall of bullshit and like the poster you are you are afraid to address my response. You never do. You simply are not interested in any debate, it's batshit at all costs. You have your stock cut-and-paste replies for every situation and this is one of them. You think your pathetic little links that amount to nothing more than isolated and speculative incidents, allow you to make a total sweeping generalization about the entire media industry. That is delusion beyond words.

Now quit being a big cry-baby and respond to my rebuttal:

LINK HERE

Spam response. It is simplistic garbage and replied to in the link in blue just above. If we are playing chess, it is your move, so try not to crap on the board like you usually do and then push all the pieces over!

No, I keep posting information that takes the trouble to corroborate its data, you however simply do what you always do and ignore everything. That is just moronic.

Batshit. You have the worldview of a gullible conspiracy theorist who believes every piece of junk there is, no matter what. You never verify a single thing. As far as you are concerned 2 or 3 people have given you accounts, therefore batshit.

 

Sorry. When I saw the title at the top of the page, I thought it was this...
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/

...and I didn't look at the content.


Why do you have this title...
Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax

...at the top of the page if it's not about the Apollo hoax?


We should talk about this on this other thread.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ericans-chat-the-lies-furiously.583345/page-3

 

A most apt title.

You never looked at it originally and you never read anything not batshit.

It's a direct response to your spam that you splatter everywhere, the title is irrelevant, it's the same crap!

Well aren't you the troll comedian! It was posted on that thread already, hence the damn link to it. You ignored it then and are ignoring it now. But that's what you always do. Pathetic.

 

Show me the science that vaccines (1) protect against ANY so-called 'infectious' or transmissible diseases, and (2) are safe.

 

You ARE joking right?
Take Pertussis or whooping cough

https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/pregnant/mom/deadly-disease-for-baby.html

Now if you DONT like the CDC I can provide links on this from any number of countries

 

The following are important points you may not be aware of:

(A) Whooping cough/pertussis is BLAMED on a bacterium, not a virus.

(B) There are issues & questionable attributions assigned to the diagnosis of so-called 'infectious' diseases. So we should focus more on deaths.

Pertussis (Whooping Cough)
It must be borne in mind, however, that notification rates are notoriously poor indicators of actual disease rates. Changes in habits, changes in disease definitions, and prompting from from health officials all contribute to varying patterns of reporting, and therefore render the rates incomparable over time. Mortality (deaths) is a much more stable indicator of actual disease trends.
https://avn.org.au/information/vaccines-and-diseases/dtp/meryl/

(C) Deaths from whooping cough had already been on the decline, and had dropped roughly 95% (since 1920) when mass vaccination commenced in 1953 with the licensing of DPT vaccine. This suggests there was no contribution to the decline in whooping cough deaths from vaccinations.

The following graph shows mortality attributed to whooping cough from 1870 to 1970 in Australia.


The following graph is confined to the latter 50 years (1920-1970) of the period plotted in the graph above, and focuses on the under-5 years age group:


(D) Pertussis vaccines (DTP & DTaP) are toxic & dangerous

From an interview with Australian Dr. Archie Kalokerinos
At first it was just a simple clinical observation. I observed that many infants, after they received routine vaccines like tetanus, diptheria, polio, whooping cough or whatever, became ill. Some became extremely ill, and in fact some died. It was an observation, It was not a theory. So my first reaction was to look at the reasons why this happened. ... Furthermore, some of the reactions to the vaccines were not those that were listed in the standard literature. They were very strange reactions indeed. A third observation was that with some of these reactions which normally resulted in death I found that I could reverse them by giving large amounts of vitamin C intramuscularly or intravenously.
... Only after realizing that routine immunizations were dangerous, did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates. The worst vaccine of all is the whooping cough [pertussis] vaccine. ... It is responsible for a lot of deaths and for a lot of infants suffering irreversible brrain damage.
... My final conclusion after forty years or more in this business is that the unofficial policy of the World Health Organisation and the unofficial policy of ‘Save the Children’s Fund and almost all those organisations is one of murder and genocide. They want to make it appear as if they are saving these kids, but in actual fact they don’t. I am talking of those at the very top. Beneath that level is another level of doctors and health workers, like myself, who don’t really understand what they are doing. But I cannot see any other possible explanation: It is murder and it is genocide. And I tell you what: when the black races really wake up to what we have done to them they are not going to thank us very much. And if you want to see what harm vaccines do, don’t come to Australia or New Zealand or any place, go to Africa and you will see it there.
https://alternative-doctor.com/dr-archie-kalokerinos/

NOTE: Like Australia, VAERS uses a ‘passive’ adverse reaction reporting system which means that they admit to only collecting between 1 and 10% of all reactions. Therefore, vaccine injury/death figures are likely to represent only a small percentage of the actual damage caused by these vaccines.

(E) Not only is there ample scientific research pointing to the failure of both the whole-cell & acellular vaccine to have any impact on reducing pertussis----and in fact, because of its toxic ingredients, may be causing more disease & deaths----but it appears that pertussis has been on the increase since the 1970's and that this pace has actually accelerated with the introduction of the acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine. The disease in the US is currently at its highest levels since the 1940's!

(2017) The relationship between mucosal immunity, nasopharyngeal carriage, asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis
The incidence of whooping cough in the US has been rising slowly since the 1970s, but the pace of this has accelerated sharply since acellular pertussis vaccines replaced the earlier whole cell vaccines in the late 1990s. A similar trend occurred in many other countries, including the UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and Spain, following the switch to acellular vaccines. The key question is why.

... Pertussis vaccine is considered by mainstream medical science to be the WORST of all vaccines in preventing illness:

Pertussis is arguably the least well prevented of the common vaccine-preventable childhood diseases. Why this may be so reflects gaps in our understanding of the immunology and epidemiology of this pathogen, how these variables are affected by pertussis vaccines, and the degree to which they affect the transmissibility of B. pertussis. [...] The resurgence of pertussis in the aP vaccine era is evolving into a slow-moving global public health crisis. But, with the public’s trust in vaccines waning, this has also become a public relations crisis.
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1568/v1

(F) Medical scientists present their ideas & claims based on a severe lack of confidence & knowledge, yet the public accepts it as if it was the golden truth.

Scientists cannot even determine whether the mere presence of the alleged causative bacterium (B. pertussis) is enough to cause pertussis:

(2017) The relationship between mucosal immunity, nasopharyngeal carriage, asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis
A significant, but surprisingly under-examined, unknown is whether an asymptomatic infection state exists for B. pertussis, as is the case for many other bacterial respiratory pathogens, notably Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type B (HiB), and Neisseria meningitidis.
https://f1000research.com/articles/6-1568/v1

(G) Antigen-based vaccines offers no protection from so-called 'infectious' diseases because they are based on pseudoscience.

(2014) Evolution of whooping cough bacterium could reduce vaccine effectiveness
The bacterium that causes whooping cough, Bordetella pertussis, has changed – most likely in response to the vaccine used to prevent the disease – with a possible reduced effectiveness of the vaccine as a result, a new study shows. ... "More studies are needed to better understand the effects of vaccination on the evolution of the organism,” says Associate Professor Lan.
http://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/sc...-bacterium-could-reduce-vaccine-effectiveness

------------------------------------------

A side note on the nature & state of modern medicine that most are unaware of:

***** Stats show that, at most, only 3.5% of the total decline in deaths can be attributed to medical intervention (including whooping cough vaccines).

The Questionable Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline in the US in the 20th Century (pdf)
In general, medical measures (both chemotherapeutic and prophylactic) appear to have contributed little to the overall decline in mortality in the United States since about 1900----having in many instances been introduced several decades after a marked decline had already set in and having no detectable influence in most instances. More specifically, with reference to those five conditions (influenza, pneumonia, diptheria, whooping cough, and poliomyelitis) for which the decline in mortality appears substantial after the point of intervention----and on the unlikely assumption that all of this decline is attributable to the intervention----it is estimated that at most 3.5 percent of the total decline in mortality since 1900 could be ascribed to medical measures introduced for the diseases considered here.
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/pubhealth/rosner/g8965/client_edit/readings/week_2/mckinlay.pdf

(2016) Johns Hopkins study suggests medical ERRORS are THIRD-LEADING cause of death in U.S.
Analyzing medical death rate data over an eight-year period, Johns Hopkins patient safety experts have calculated that more than 250,000 deaths per year are due to medical error in the U.S.
https://hub.jhu.edu/2016/05/03/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death/

Iatrogenic (medically induced) deaths are the LEADING cause of death at between 800,000 - 1 million deaths annually.
https://chiro.org/Graphics_Box_LINKS/FULL/Death_By_Medicine.html


***** Medical research guidelines & 'peer review' are biased & offer no scientific protection:

Guideline Based on Discredited Research May Have Caused 800,000 Deaths In Europe Over The Last 5 Years.
Guidelines are based on evidence, and evidence is based on clinical trials. And major clinical trials are, almost without exception, paid for, run, and controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. The great and good of medicine, the ‘Key Opinion Leaders’ KOLs, who put together the guidelines will almost all have very close connections with the industry. In some cases they will have been paid millions by pharmaceutical companies. Whether they think so, or not, these opinion leaders are biased. Biased in favour of pharmaceutical products that are promoted through biased research, and launched on an unsuspecting world. And there is no-one out there to check what these KOLs and guideline committees are doing.
https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2014/01/20/guidelines-kill-800000/

Reliability of 'peer review' is a falacy
The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude means of discovering the acceptability — not the validity — of a new finding. Editors and scientists alike insist on the pivotal importance of peer review. We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong. - Richard Horton, Editor of the Lancet

---------------------------------

If you want to know what's killing people, look at EMF/wireless radiation, vaccines, medical treatment & drugs, recreational drugs, malnutrition, unsanitary conditions (breeding ground for mold & parasites), stress, and man-made toxins in our food, air, water, soil, and home. Germs are not to be feared, and viruses do not exist. It's that simple.