To the anti-Muslim crowd here: what say you of this?

We can make an addendum, except Islamo's.

 

Well, better get started. Article V of the US Constitution has everything you need...Except, you know, the political support required.

While we're at it, let's get rid of the Baptists, too. They're also prone to violence and primitive beliefs.

 

That small minority as you call it, is bigger than what you might realize. There are approx. 5 million Muslims in this country...could be more. 1% of Muslims believe that terrorism is justified. That means that approx. 50,000 mean to do us harm...Yeah...no biggy...it only took 13 to kill more than 3000 private citizens on 9/11

 

You mean those non-christian losers from westboro baptist? They are Islamolosers in disguise. They are no more Christian than my dog.

 

Which period of invasion, piracy, or white slavery do you want to discuss?


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AL_OtpFdBtA"]YouTube - The Sack of Baltimore. The kidnapping of Irish by Algerian Pirates[/ame]

 

He was...............

 

lolz The Islamic Imperialist expansionism through unprovoked wars of conquest against the Byzantine Empire and Western Christendom began appx. 500 years before the first crusades.

But let's start with the unprovoked war of aggression of the Rashidun Caliphate against the Zoroastrian Sassanid Empire of Persia where the Islamic Imperialists conquered Persia and Mesopotamia between 633 and 656, they then moved on to conquer Syria in 637, then they conquered Armenia in 639, then they conquered Egypt in 639, then they conquered North Africa in 652.

Under the Umayyads they finished their conquest of North Africa in 665, then between 662 and 709 they conquered Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and southwest Kazakhstan, then between 664 and 712 they conquered the Indian sub-continent entirely, then between 711 and 718 they conquered the Iberian Peninsula of Hispania, they then laid siege to Constantinople between 717 and 718, then between 711 and 750 they conquered the Caucasus, they then conquered Tbilisi in 736, and they then conquered southern Italy in 827.

And yet the First Crusade didn't even start until 1096 which was a clear war of self defense in response to Islamic Imperialist conquest of an expansion into the lands of Christendom.

 

So where are the other 4,000 911s?

 

Do you get a thrill out of sounding dumb on purpose? Because that was beyond idiotic.

 

It was a metaphoric comparison used as a colloquial of similarity imagining the equallity of religious incompetence between the imposters of westboro and Islamonazi's.

 

It's hard to figure out what the hell you're trying to say because you use the term "Muslim" and "Islamo" interchangably. So do you want Muslims to leave as a whole?

 

Choked on my coffee, there.

 

Logically speaking, you shouldn't have said they were "islamos in disguise," because that implies they even like Muslims to begin with. They don't.

 

Seriously? They are interchangable. Yes. They can take their ********ed asses some place else. We do not need them, they are worthless and have been for 1400 years.

 

Soory about that! Are you alright? Need a napkin or something. Good thing there was not a cookie involved.

 

They do not like Jesus either.

 

Why, would you like to see it?
They want to do us harm...do you want to be proactive or just let it happen?
Many have been foiled or we would be there. You just have no idea what you are talking about...not blaming you...you just don't get it.

 

So based on your convoluted and bigoted word play why'd you say this in another thread?

Either they are or they aren't the same thing, pick one.

 

Since I don't get it, perhaps you can post a link showing that 3,999 terrorist attacks by Muslims that are citizens or residents of America have been foiled inside the United States?

 

True but you could make the argument that the Religious Right in the USA right now is a minority, but there are many that would say there is a lot of influence coming from that group. And, their beliefs are not nearly as strong or as strict as we find with their Muslim counterparts. I just feel that if you enjoy freedom, you should be against a group that (it appears) is try to destroy it.

 

These are statistics. Could be. They have not happened although some have been foiled. That's OK...don't worry about it...they are the religion of peace...just go about your daily life and don't fret until it's too late.

FOILED ATTACKS

Jul. 1993 – “NYC Landmark Plot
Dec. 1999 - Los Angeles Airport (Ahmed Ressam)
Jul. 2005 - Los Angeles (“California Prison Plot”)
Jun. 2006 – “Liberty City 7” planned to blow up Sears Tower
May 2007 – Fort Dix massacre plot

There are dozens or even hundreds of suspicious incidents each year that could fall under the category of “foiled terrorist attack”, or “individual jihad”, or just “financing terrorism”. In some cases we will never know. For example, in November 2006 Sisayehiticha Dinssa, an unemployed U.S. citizen from Dallas, was arrested at Detroit Metropolitan Airport arriving from Nigeria by way of Amsterdam and headed for Phoenix. He was carrying nearly $79,000 in cash, undeclared, and a laptop computer containing information about nuclear materials and cyanide.

 

Yes they are. In this case the Islamo's are trying to pollute our legal system with an unjust system of seventh century barbarity. Intolerable.

 

Portland Ore. 2010

 

Yes, there are other individual jihad foiled attacks too since 9/11.

 

And the "Islamos" are failing/going to fail in their goal. It won't happen. Ever.