Probably because the prosecution would have no use for them. What does this tell us? Thanks in no small part to Zimmerman's gun. His injuries could have been much worse. WHITE can mean nearly anything nowadays, apparently. If we use that type of definition, even Obama could be considered "white". Maybe it's just me, but I don't think the KKK ever had the term "white" in mind for Hispanic mestizos with mixed Indian-Spanish blood.
AS always, you don't know WYF you are blathering about: Lawyer for George Zimmerman 'frustrated' at prosecutors' withholding of graphic photo The attorney for George Zimmerman said he is "frustrated" that prosecutors withheld a color photo of the Florida gunman that could bolster his case that Zimmerman was being beaten when he shot Trayvon Martin. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/0...d-george-zimmerman-from-night-trayvon-martin/ No one here shows more ignorance of the facts of this case than your posts, and yet you keep creating threads to HIGHLIGHT THAT VERY IGNORANCE. It's like playing basketball with your head...you get SLAM DUNKED nearly every post. Tell us again how the photos were not withheld,and all about the FCAT-flunking "honors student."....
This didn't stop the Liberal media. Zimmerman has already been judged in the minds of TV-watching African Americans around the country. If Zimmerman is found innocent, he will probably have to flee the country, or fear vigilante reprisals. If you thought Zimmerman was prejudiced against young Black males before, now every time he sees one in public he will be wondering in the back of his mind whether he is going to be attacked and killed.
speculation, conjecture, opinion, no supporting facts or evidence. (They do know what facts and evidence are in Scandinavia?)
They had a BLACK AND WHITE, LOW-QUALITY copy. The ORIGINAL IMAGE, in ALL ITS GLORY, was not available to the defense until late October. The more you try to pretend you "have somthing", the more ridiculous your posts get. Yet, ANOTHER pimp-slappin'...how you must LOVE the pain...
theyres no point in debating with a treyvon supporting troll.... honestly if GZ is guilty, then we are all doomed. we have then lost the right to self defense...
Which is why he will be awarded MILLION$ for the slander, libel,and defamation of character , he was subjected to, in a glaring media CONSPIRACY to manufacture a pre-determined image of him.
WE can call it , "Tribute to All of the 'No Limit (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s'......who got themselves ventilated."
Actually, those colors would indicate the Bloods, or a Blood-affiliated set.... Either way, the primary cultural perogative is:
Think what America's inner cities would look like if a memorial was put up for every dead Black 'gang-banger'. You wouldn't be able to move.
Waiting for someone to come and say, hey these are his Mason brothers, they are just clowning. Are you a grown man Grok? Do you and your buds get together and dress alike and take these cool pics flashing awesome signs with your hands?
Not exactly. My set dresses like the bad guys in Road Warrior, and practices for the end of civilization, when we finally get to MARAUD!! I've always wanted to maraud.... You're correct...it's pretty ridiculous display, but consistent with the male role model, for some poor kid calling himself the "No Limit (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)", and thuggin' out...he wasn't taught any better, it seems.
So we've gone from THE DEFENSE NEVER GOT ANY PHOTOS!!! . . . to oh yea, Dasein is right they were given the photos. Good job. You know what else the defense had the whole time? Z's medical records that actually prove he had no serious bodily injuries. Too bad medical records aren't as SENSATIONAL as color photos. Thirdly, all that photo does is prove AGAIN that the gunman is a liar. He's got quite the gusher in that photo. Didn't Z also say that Trayvon had his hands covering his mouth while he tried to scream for help? How is that there was no blood, no saliva, no DNA at all found on Trayvon's hands? With a gusher like that Trayvon's hands should have been covered in blood. If Z was telling the truth.
Make up many lies? Please quote me saying the "defense never got any photos"? As everyone here knows, except you, apparently (memory issues?), I said the prosecution withheld the PHOTOS MOST DAMAGING TO THEIR CASE...and then easily proved just that. And now you're just making up more complete bullcrap. Please provide PROOF OF YOUR CLAIMS...I just SCHOOLED YOU, on HOW TO DO IT. Of course, unfortunately for you, your claims would have to have a FACTUAL BASIS, for you to provide PROOF, as I easily did. Debating you is like boxing with a blind person. Good Luck....