Tree-rings prove climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is now - and

So time for the global warming alarmists, concealed socialist and communists, to ****!
​

​

 

Good Job, putting up the tree ring data, Skyhunter! yeah yeah!

But, since the "global warming" fanatics and crazies don't care to consider that there were nice farms in Greenland 1000 years ago, neither will they consider tree rings.

They only care about repeating their story infinitum till they get us all taxed up to our noses to where its not lawful for us to trample the grass on the way to our cave.

In other words, it is all an excuse to reduce human population.

 

I've noticed the liberals are pretending this thread doesn't exist in the hope it'll scroll away into oblivion and nobody else will read it.

 

Go to NOAA Paleoclimatology.

I will take their word over yours....they have to be responsable for what they say.

 

The Daily Heil? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

 

They study used local tree ring samples and then applied them globally. Nothing to see here.

 

if liberal is defined as anyone with more than a 2nd grade level understanding of science ya they are...

 

Of course the abnormally hot summer over most of North America and drought in the Corn belt for a third year in a row is no kind of evidence for climate change either, right?

 

No, but if the trend continues for a decade or two it'll start to look like it might become significant.

 

Quotting a bunch of different liberals from this very forum.
"Weather ain't climate."

 

how do explain that to someone who doesn't even understand what "trend" means or it's significance...it's like explaining Higgs boson particle to a headhunter from the depths of the Amazon...where is your start point for that conversation?

 

What do you think the proxy data is that the warming alarmists use?

 

If global warming didn't come with it the agenda to wreck Western civilization as we know it I might keep an open mind. But until then, I will assume it is all lies and propaganda.

 

Could you repeat the above in coherent sentences, minus the spittle flecks?

 

Sorry you don't understand what proxy data is. Look it up.

 

Wasn't tree ring data what Mann used to develop his "hockey stick" graph. Of course, Mann had to doctor the tree ring data to make it fit the graph.

What makes you think the NOAA - rife with Warmers - is credible?

 

One specific set of trees in northern Colorado applied to the entire world to be exact.

 

Yet a group of lonesome pines in an area the size of Costa Rica where the winter temperature is -50C and the summer high a balmy 20C shows global heatwaves in Roman times.

 

So time travel really does exist. Or will.

It's obvious since the Romans must have had SUV's.

 

In my opinion, merely playing shell games with Statism isn't going to do much regarding global climate change that seems to occur regardless of human activity. Why not allocate those resources instead, to advance our knowledge of structures such that we can create habitable zones anywhere on the planet, regardless of climate change. Such knowledge could be of benefit even off of our planet.

 

I would bear true witness to that.

 

In Roman and medieval times most of the ports of Europe are where they are today. Venice and Marseilles haven't moved a millimeter. A port in Turkey went high and dry and Alexandria moved but those were both due to documented earthquakes.

From that we can deduce that tempertures warmer than today didn't significantly change sea levels.

I do agree with danielpalos that other "remedies" than a vast increase in the power of an aready-too-powerful government would be a better response. For instance the US could loosen up regs that are impossible to comply with to allow new nuke plants to replace an aging fleet of nukes and coal-fired power plants. Viola! A one-third reduction in US emissions andbest of all the hyper-corrupt UN doesn't get a dime.