Trump asks Mike Pompeo to look at South African land seizures and 'large scale killing of farmers'

I have been looking for some sort of accurate verfication.. Are you saying that land ownership really isn't skewed to white farmers?

 

No one else was FARMING, except the whites, and that will be the net result of this RACIST BULLSHIT, just like in Rhodesia...

 

It is skewed towards white farmers, overall. But how does that make land seizures without compensation from one race to another justified? It has been for a very long time, but the gap has been closing as well. Back in 1994, the gap was almost 86%.... With time, South Africa will eventually equal out or favor the moostly black population. No need to expedite it with seizures and risk bank defaults, genocide, mass migration and possibly famine.

 

Shame isn't it?

 

What is? A shame that South Africa is persecuting those based on skin color? Yes, yes it is.

The US should withhold the $500 million we send them in aide.

 

Actually, if I'm 'fighting a good fight', it's for every property-owner everywhere in the world -- the White ones, the Black ones, and the East-Asian (Oriental) ones, too! One of the hallmarks of every civilized society is that its citizens should be safe and secure from unlawful seizure and confiscation -- especially when these despicable, uncivilized acts are committed without even the offer of fair, equitable compensation!

Beyond that, well, it's mid-afternoon on a lovely Saturday in L.A., and I sincerely hope that you and your friends are having a wonderful time this weekend.... Enjoy!

 

You are in fact making the argument FOR the land redistribution. The land in question was stolen without compensation from people whose ancestors had live on it for centuries by the uncivilized apartheid government of the 50s-80s. Ronald Reagan was president during some of the seizures, that's how recent we're talking. THOSE seizures were very much about race.

 

Nobody 'stole' anything from anybody. Before the European settlers arrived (along with others from the Middle East and India), there were only various Black tribes in scattered locations here and there, living as they had for millennia, in a manner that can fairly be compared to "the Stone Age".

They had no government beyond some 'strong-man' tribal chieftain, maybe some 'elders' (more 'strong-men', warriors, etc.), and a 'medicine man' or some sort of 'wizard'. The various tribes conducted almost constant warfare on each other for plunder and dominance, practiced Black-on-Black slavery, and lived on slash-and-burn agriculture, 'bush-meat', and insects for thousands of years. The very idea of an equitable, egalitarian appropriation of a person's personal property with compensation would have been utterly incomprehensible to them! And, this seems clearly to be the case among the ruling Black South African elite today....

Interesting question: Suppose that European settlers had tried to 'purchase land' from the tribal chieftains all those hundreds of years ago? How could they have determined who-owned-which parcels of land in the first place? What would they have used for currency? How would they have struck a contract? There was no written language, there were no formalized, permanent codes of Law, there was really no government beyond some bunch of tribal 'strong-men'. To the Europeans, there was really nothing there but an aboriginal people who were still living in the Stone Age. They hadn't even developed 'Iron-Age' smelting technology until it was introduced long after the 'Iron-Age' had already been superseded. They didn't have the WHEEL until that invention was imported from elsewhere, also.

Thus, to the European mind, having any dealings with these tribal people beyond the most elementary and primitive kinds of interactions was futile. Your house pets understand what it is for you to feed them and have them obey a few simple commands... but would you try to explain Roman-Dutch Law, or English Common Law to them...? Read the history without all the distorted, present-day REVISIONISM, and you'll make fewer errors in your understanding of what actually happened....

 

Put aside your white supremacist bull and try to open your brain. The land in dispute was taken so recently that some of the people who lost their lands ARE STILL ALIVE.
As to your revisionist history lesson....well...I better not...waste of time and band width

 

I take it that you refer to "the Natives Land Act" of 1913? The act decreed that whites were not allowed to buy land from natives and vice versa. That stopped white farmers from buying more native land. Oh, hell, look it up for heaven's sake. I'm tired of doing all the research for your faction....

In any event, this "Act" was repealed in 1991, even before Apartheid ended in South Africa, 24 years ago.

So, NOW, what is the justification for stealing White South Africans' property without compensation in 2018? This ought to be good....

 

Closed minds are such a waste. You keep referencing ancient history rather than when the lands under discussion were taken. I posted the timeline yesterday. Try and stick to the apartheid period when this happened.

 

Yes. Ignorance is a waste of band width, alright.

 

Which group in South Africa is "oppressed"? Certainly not the black majority that holds all the positions of power and law in that nation.

Try thinking about what you are about to post. It helps.

 

Cite that post please so I can examine it myself. Thanks.

 

If, say, an American Indian wants some farmland today, he BUYS it. See how that works?
[Communists scratching his head "...wait, why would he BUY it if a socialist-leaning government can STEAL it and just give it to him for FREE - I just don't understand, FreedomSeeker...."]

 

Maoist, as well. Kim Jong Un would be so very very PROUD of the black South Africans.

Yes, Hitler stole property from the Jews. When a majority race steals from a minority race (Hitler/Jews, South Africa/whites, etc.) it's an abomination.

 

The poor poor oppressed MAJORITY!!! (These leftists are going insane, it appears.)

The EFF leader wears a communist-revolutionary-style hat....not surprising. So do others in his party.
Note the WEAPON on their logo - not unlike the SWORD in Islamic flags.
Communists never want to PAY for stuff - not when they can STEAL it (like Fidel Castro did.) Fidel is still a role model to thieves in communist lands.

 

How DARE you condemn BLACK people when they are racist!!! HOW DARE you!!

 

Asians make more money in America than white people do, per capita - so gosh, I guess, uh, we'll need to start coming up with ways to keep the Asians down, apparently. Should we start by boycotting/firebombing that "Crazy Rich Asians" movie??? I'm sure that Antifa is drawing up plans as we speak.

[Yes, I'm joking, of course.]

 

So then you CONDEMN the majority race stealing land from the minority race in SA today, based on skin color, correct?

 

Can't condemn any race if I'm not a racist. Nice try though ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡° ).

 

So you can't condemn the Nazis for being racist then. That's too bad.

 

Hey, it's your strawman to burn down ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

 

Please keep us informed as to what's going on over at Stormfront - thanks.

 

What sort of non "racist" will back the majority race in a nation when they steal the land of the minority and talk of "cutting the throat of whiteness" in the process?
Not a racist? That's absolute bs!