Trump blows off the White House Correspondents Dinner

So you also think that all women who have sex are prostitutes, just like your view is that any man who has consentual sex is a sexual assailant.

Do you also stand on street corners with a Bible in hand shouting at people they are going to hell if they don't stop having sex?

Is your raging about women attracted to financially successful men in your messages because you aren't financially successful? Your messages indicate huge sexual hangups about women in general.

 

Bill Clinton sexual misconduct allegations

How about it are you cool with it?

 

Personally, being the prick I am, I would have gone... But whatevs.

 

IMO...he and is crooked swamp critters are way too busy planning ways of fleecing of the USA via Wall Street deregulation, lifting Russian sanctions to profit off of gas and oil, using he taxpayer's dime to cover travel and security expenses in order to further the Trump brand and who the hell knows what else...to worry their greedy little reptilian brains about a correspondence dinner. The White House has become a front for massive fraud and deception.

 

Hate to break it to you Peppermint, but the White House has been that for at least 20 years.

 

fake news is like saying Trump is a Muslim.... and created ISIS or that Trump was not born in America or That Trumps father helped.. oh you get it... Trump is the king of alternative facts

 

Can't handle the truth eh? Just like your dear leader

 

Nope; tweeting is for cowards who don't have the guts, or intellect, to confront their critics face to face-like real men, unlike the snivelling wretch in the White House.

 

Dodging the issue won't make your post any smarter. The whole point is Trump's hypocrisy. If he really cared about US workers he would have employed them in America. But no, 'profit before patriotism', that's his motto.

 

Typical TDS.

 

WOW! Twitter has 313 million active users in 2016, quite the insult there So what's your take on people that anonymously subscribe to say a forum, and rack up forty one thousand posts? I think the blaring difference here is Trump actually lays his identity out for all to see instead of some anonymous stage name, clearly a Pot & Kettle moment here I'm sure you'd agree!

 

Surely you're not suggesting he hasn't employed American and hires only foreign workers? I think logically Trump projects are done thru Bidding and contractors, the contractors then handle everything from labor to material, while Trump oversees project costs, completion schedule and modification. I seriously doubt Trump sat down and went thru three or four hundred labor application, I think your beef is with the contractors

 

The MSM's leftist slant isn't B.S. Its a certified FACT. Its indisputable. Hillary wouldn't have been chosen as our next president in a landslide, by nearly EVERY outlet, if the MSM was being objective. You can either bury your head or keep your eyes open.

 

Was he found guilty of discrimination? Trump PERSONALLY, not a business he owns? Now, if it happened consistently year after year, of course you could call him a racist but a single dispute when he was just starting out....you're soooooooo stretching. If you would like context, and I'm sure you do, here are a bunch of companies sued for discrimination. I can link a bunch more but you get the idea. By YOUR standards, better check into Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and just about every CEO who has owned a major corporation and check how many times they're sued for basically everything under the sun.

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...=2&ie=UTF-8#q=apple+sued+for+discrimination&*

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...2&ie=UTF-8#q=Google+sued+for+discrimination&*

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...e=UTF-8#q=starbucks+sued+for+discrimination&*

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...pv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=CNN+sued+for+discrimination&*

https://www.google.com/webhp?source...e=UTF-8#q=microsoft+sued+for+discrimination&*

 

And tbe members of Congress who boycotted the inaugural?
The press that was threatening to boycott this event if Trump appeared?

- - - Updated - - -

No and you know what my point is as you repeatedly prove it.....do keep it up.

And you do know Jimmy Carter declined it twice as did Nixon?

 

So don't dodge, he bought foreign made goods

Tell me when you bought your new smartphone that was made in China, did you outsource a job there? When you buy your clothes that are made in Viet Nam did you outsource those jobs there?

 

This isn't about ME. I have a house full of foreign made stuff. This is about Trump vigorously campaigning on bringing jobs 'back' to America, while at the same time having his Trump International clothing line made abroad for sale in the US, when it could just as simply be made in America, by Americans. If you can't see the glaringly obvious double standard I suggest a trip to an optician.https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=t...UICCgB&biw=1024&bih=485#imgrc=tFSabOqMw7QGAM:

 

Sure it is itbis about your opinion.

SO why do you about source for products you want and then criticize others who do so? Why don't you buy all your goods in the UK? Why do you outsource?

That glasshouse thingy.

 

I'm not a billionaire who could build a factory in the US and not even notice how much I spent. I'm not a billionaire who could just as easily utilise the many existing US clothing factories with the manufacturing capacity to make his stuff in America. Nope; profit before patriotism. That's your leader. Not opinion; fact.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=t...UICCgB&biw=1024&bih=485#imgrc=tFSabOqMw7QGAM:

 

I think the name calling tradition went out the window when Obama was called a communist muslim. It's ironic that right wing knuckle draggers are calling for respect and decorum when they couldn't afford a single ounce to the previous Administration.

- - - Updated - - -

Does one being sexually active assume that sexual assault is ok? You're defending the indefensible here. Celibate men are not the only men who view sexual assault as wrong. That was a pathetic reply even by your low standards.

 

Standard response for a trump apologist/sexual assault enabler. I feel bad for the women (if there are any misfortunate enough to be) in your life. If someone were to grab a woman you cared about by the (*)(*)(*)(*)(*), I wonder if you'd simply dismiss it as locker room banter.

 

OH so you declare he could build a factory to produce everything he wants to purchase? It's all because he has more money than you.

How laughable. So if someone needs to purchase $100,000 worth of special made clothing they should build a $10,000,000 factory to produce just what they need.

And nothing stopping you from putting together the capital and staff to build a factory to produce your shirts in the UK then, it can be a mini-factory with just one seamstress and one loom.

 

I agree the members of Congress should not have boycotted the inaugural, but .....

http://time.com/4636736/inauguration-boycott-1973/

 

Women who sell themselves to men are prostitutes. See the first lady for an example.


,

Not sure where you got this bit of idiocy.

I'm not a religious idiot who believes in fairy tales, so no. I'm not advocating celibacy, I'm advocating respect for women and a halt to behavior than enables sexual assault. For some reason, you cannot separate the two.

I'm the one with women issues? You're defending a person advocating sexual assault. That's what grabbing a woman by the (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) is. It's not macho, or cool, or masculine. If melania wants to e a prostitute and sell herself to a fat, disgusting piece of orange luggage, that's fine. She's free to do so. However, for the right to call her classy is just hilarious.

 

But what and what about it?

Were they too

Quote Originally Posted by cupAsoup View Post
If the big fat baby can't handle a little criticism, he's in the wrong job.