Trump supporter accused of assaulting woman says Trump inspired him

If they let them, he added.

what about them? Half of America is divorced.

His comment is open for interpretation. How many times have you heard parents saying how handsome or pretty to their children?

That's rich being that the left is calling for the president's assassination. But to address it, context is key. While I wouldn't say something like that, in light of the disruptions caused by the left during his campaign, it's understandable why he would say it.

That's your opinion.

 

And now you don't even have to go on a date when you can grab any woman you please
by the crotch.

 

So if someone encourages people to riot, they bear no responsibility?

 

No, but President Trump didn't incite sexual violence.

 

A Democrat and Clinton supporter shot over 100 people at an LGTB nightclub, murdering 49 and crippling more. A Democrat and Clinton supporter set off bombs in NYC. A Democrat and Sanders supporter shot a Congressman, police and others. The Democrat VP candidate's son attacked a group of Republicans with explosives, incendiaries, and chemicals. There are hundreds of videos of people being violently assaulted by Democrats for the person supporting Trump, even in their own yards for having a Trump sign.

I do not see any crime committed in the instance of the OPer story. A person was at a Trump rally to be disruptive, was told to leave and refused to do so. I see no crime in physically evicting the person and by comparison to the violent and murderous criminal attacks by both Clinton and Sanders supporters this is so trivial as to be nothing whatsoever.

 

I don't think the guy did anything illegal at all.

 

I agree. But remember, a woman was just found guilty of murdering a man by cell phone, telling him to go ahead and kill himself.

 

When he died he was a Republican fellow traverler and a Trump supporter

 

A Republican and Trump supporter went into a church and killed nine while they prayed.

 

The point that you're missing is that their are crazies on both sides (although more on yours than ours). These crazies do not represent the non crazies unless the non crazies support the acts of the crazies.