U of Minnesota -- 12 step recovery program for whiteness

It's not I. I am giving you what AA is about and the myths you've fallen for.

You opinion is noted.
If you have some proof offer it.

 

It is and I have offered proof which you have failed to address or dispute.

You are giving revisionist spin which ignores facts.

 

Encyclopedia Britannica is spin?
Seriously?

I haven't seen a single link from you proving AA is discriminatory. Because it's not.

 

It is and you proved it. It discrimninates against white men. That is absolute fact.

Other laws discriminate against a minority

Your link is spin

 

Since he's playing the letter of the law game, let's play along.
AA is, by the letter of the law, not based on race. Also, by the letter of the law, the police departments in this nation have no systemic racism.

Notice how the American Indians were skipped over in this discussion. They are given completely separate treatment, by law, in these United States. They are sovereign nations that are not sovereign and not nations. They have their own laws yet must abide by the laws of the United States. As such, the United States gives them special treatment simply due to their race.
For example:
U.S.C. Sec. 130, which authorizes the withholding of payments or goods while Indians are
under the influence of or have access to alcohol.

and this one
If I have qualified Native American and non-Native American applicants, do I have to consider all qualified candidates?
No, if the contractor utilizes a publically announced Indian employment preference and has a sufficient number of qualified Native American applicants to fill job vacancies it may not need to consider non-Native American applicants.

Is Indian preference limited to hiring only?
No, federal contractors maintaining publicly announced Indian employment preferences are permitted to extend such preferences to a broad array of employment actions, including hiring, promotion, layoff, termination, reinstatement, and reductions in force.

What is TERO?
TERO stands for Tribal Employment Rights Ordinance or Office. TERO Ordinances require that all employers who are engaged in operating a business on reservations give preference to qualified Indians in all aspects of employment, contracting and other business activities. TERO Offices were established and empowered to monitor and enforce the requirements of the tribal employment rights ordinance.

 

Correct. All such discrimination is terrible.

 

Yes. AA doesn't discriminate.

 

Your opinion doesn't mean it's so. You've not offered 1 thing to back up your claim.

Prove white men are discriminated against. I even helped you out. I showed in one link and post, 6 of 3000 or so cases ended where it was decided that reverse discrimination happened. So, 0.0005%. That many would happen in normal every day life.

 

I stated fact not opinioon learn the difference.

\Reverse discrimination does not exst and is therefore irrellevant which means you have shown NOTHING

AA discriminates against white men.

TYhe civil rights act discriminates against a minority which claimded it does not do but you have been proven wrong

 

Facts require data. Your opinion isn't data.

 

No they do not

The world is not flat. That is fact which requires no data as is this.

AA discriminitaes as do other laws because that is how they are written.

Plain fact proving you wrong. AAis designed to oppress whites en and succeeds. You have failed to provide any evidence whatsoever to the congtrary

 

If you have facts to support you opinion, post them. Until then, you're just making things up.
There is verifiable data to back up the earth in not flat.
You have posted not 1 iota of verifiable data. Heck, you've post not 1 shred of any data.


I posted a fact, 6 of 3000 were deemed to be reverse discrimination. 0.0005%.

 

The law is factual and proves me right and you wrong.

Once again your post is irrelevant and proves nothing one way or the other. I never argued reverse discrimination happens because it does not and it does not exist.

your posts are absolute failures

 

You've proven nothing. Except you have no data or facts to back up your claim. Else, after 3 days, you would have posted something.

Now, you can post your unsubstantiated opinion 1 more time. For we're done until you actually post real data and not your unsubstantiated opinion.

 

I have coted the law which is factual and proves my point.

We aere done because you have been pwned and proven wrong

Once again you do not conprehend the difference between fact and opinion I stated fact proving your ignorance based opinion wrong

 

this makes me proud of white ppl. They finally get it. Too many of you in self denial.

 

Did they treat people the way they are displaying? Who was it that they treated this way? If they did treat people this way, then they should make amends.

I'm glad I have never allowed anyone to treat another human in such a manner, or done such a thing myself.

 

You didnt bring any facts tho, just gossip. On the coastline the whites did actually conquer and enslave through war.

Also if by "selling eachother" youre referring to the law passed by king manuel (the portuguese ruled much of west africa) that gave consent to Guinea Judges to order the capture and recompense of the Lancados (which subsequently began the trans atlantic slave trade) then id agree. What most sholars wouldnt agree with you about is that Lancados and African princes were brothers...lancados were norn and raised to do europes bidding.

 

tribal warfare lmao. This was a holy decree issued by the crown.

 

We don't need to "counteract" whiteness, we need more of it:

 

What??

 

The so called tribal warfare was ordered by the crown (portugal) with all captives assets split between the crown and the captor. Hardly tribal warfare.

 

Wtf are you talking about? Africans have engaged in slavery since LITERALLY the beginnings of recorded human history. No one needed to order them to do anything. They were willfully engaged in the practice and had been for thousands of years before they ever even saw a white man.

 

If it isn't predicated upon RACE and/or GENDER, what is it predicated upon?

 

There's no 'reverse' racism and discrimination. There is only racism and discrimination.

Claiming 'reverse' is special pleading. IE, "my racism is special, so it's okay". Every racist who ever drew breath thought their racism was special.