Unheard of precedent; biased prosecutors requires interference from DOJ Heads

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Lee_Wang_Tran, Feb 12, 2020.

  1. Lee_Wang_Tran

    Lee_Wang_Tran Newly Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2019
    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    156
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Wow this is unheard of, the prosecutors recommended sentence was so biased that it warranted interference from the top down, resulting in disgraced biased prosecutors resigning.

    These prosecutors were actually so bad that it required people to step in and correct their judgment. DRAIN THE SWAMP! PARDON ROGER STONE!
     
    nra37922 likes this.
  2. PPark66

    PPark66 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2018
    Messages:
    3,416
    Likes Received:
    2,314
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I hope you’re joking.

    Our system is set-up so the DOJ operates independently from the administration. Otherwise you end up with a Banana Republic.

    First, Barr’s right hand man was placed over both these cases (Flynn and Stone). We know that by the absence of the case prosecutors signatures on recent filings. Something was askew.

    My guess is Trump just screwed-up Barr’s best laid plan with his spewing. Good for us, the public now knows for certain somethings really wrong in frightening un-American way.

    This act of authoritarianism was so offensive it isn’t going away in a day.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2020

Share This Page