UPDATE: "Non-Binary" University Instructor Calls To 'Destigmatize' Pedophilia

What’s the fourth K for?

 

With such a statement, I would think you would provide a link to your statement?

 

It was a response to the OP and it was a comment on the topic of the thread. I was highlighting the distinction between having a subconscious desire and if or how you choose to act on it.

I'm not left or right, I'm normal.

 

Agree 100%

 

That might explain why the LW Cancel Crowd hasn't destroyed that pedo yet.

 

Knights of the Ku Kux Klan.

 

I was responding to Tahuyaman with the same amount of "proof" as his statement, which was " There’s a definite movement on the left to normalize pedophilia".
Trying to make a point, but now you went and ruined it!
It's irritating when people say completely stupid stuff, isn't it?

 

And you still have no response for the topic in the OP. You're just here to criticize anyone who has a problem with pedophelia.

Don't kid yourself, you're a lefty to the bone.

 

So people against pedos are all in the Klan? That's what you just said, so let's see how you back pedal on this one.

 

Got it.

 

No. Republicans just prosecute the offenders.

 

I suppose you can type anything you want, but you're correct, I didn't address the original topic, but I was pressed for time.
I completely oppose pedophilia, child porn, etc.
I don't think I'm a lefty. I guess you can call me any kind of name you want if it makes you feel better. I tend to be moderate, probably leaning left since the right tends to be more intolerant and I am fairly tolerant (at least I like to think so).
I noticed you didn't call out the post that I had responded to. Is it only bad if someone criticizes something you agree with?
It's kind of a shame that people will use ANYTHING to bash the "others", even something as reprehensible as pedophilia. I wish this was a one off event, but it has been happening a lot lately on this message board.
Assumptions don't go over well, do they?

 

The big question is how do we prevent pedophiles from preying on youth? This professor is looking at how we can prevent that by looking at pedophiles who abstain from sex with minors. The logic being "hey, why not do what the people who are abstaining are doing"? The fact the professor is trans is irrelevant. This is a potential answer to pedophiles, and you will need a better argument than 'I don't like the answer'. The professor's argument is grounded in science, not your morality.

 

Pedos should all be locked up for life or hung on the streets. It's so sad in this day and age that lefties want to embrace pedos like it's just an alternative lifestyle. All of them defending it in this very thread is downright scary.

 

It's all mental illnesses left to fester. This is the result.

 

I expect we will also see more of the usual manipulation of language we see in this attempt to normalize pedophilia. To paraphrase George Orwell, sloppy language leads to sloppy thinking. No doubt Professor Pedo & Co. are counting on that.

Also note the typical attempt to absolve people of personal responsibility:

Which is a lie. People can and do control who they're attracted to all the time, yet we're supposed to believe that they can't.

BULLSH*T....

 

And according to the professor the best way to treat the mental illness... is to do what the people who are successfully handling their mental illness are doing.

 

Totally...
Trump said he would "date" his own daughter...



A person suppported by the RW has Publicly-Admitted to having Incestuous Thoughts about his Own Daughter...
Let that sink in...



Based on some of the comments in this thread, is the RW Claiming that Trump was trying to "normalize incest"?

Anyway, back on topic, as I stated in the Original Thread (from LAST Week):

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...philia-and-child-rape.594145/#post-1073063922

 

Trump is a pedophile. Therefore you advocate for hanging him in the streets.

Now is he? There are elements that would back that up. But really because you advocate for violence on this issue, people have space to say he's a pedophile and attack him for that ,regardless if he's actually a pedophile or not.

 

So lefties are now against violence? You all seem so sensitive that some in this thread allocated for it against pedos? I guess you think we all have forgotten 2020. We haven't.

 

Maybe. Although it's easy to condemn, it may be more helpful to understand it. Mental illness in the US is overlooked, mostly because it is a very difficult problem to tackle, and may me impossible to "fix" in many cases.
Pedophilia is an especially difficult problem because those afflicted by it seem to be very unchangeable. The offenders don't seem to change, and seem to be very likely to repeat their offense.
Adding to that, it wasn't long ago that sex with minors wasn't considered "bad". To this day, there are many places in the world where young women are married to much older men. Nature doesn't have a problem with it, but civilized society does (and I do, btw) so I think trying to understand it is a good place to start.
As repulsive as this professor is, there are things to be learned from this subject that could help in reducing the amount of people who act on their desires.
I learned a long time ago that there is no telling what people like sexually, and what they find arousing. You definitely can't tell by looking at them, and usually not even by talking to them.
Understanding is a key, but in the meantime, they probably should be separated from the rest of society.
And a more aggressive approach to mental health in the US would help this and many other problems.

 

Mental illnesses should be treated, but we're not there(treating this and other conditions like it) yet. You yourself said they should be hung. So to say, selective breeding/darwinism is okay depending on the person? If so, the AXIS was correct and liberal democracies were wrong about how human affairs should be conducted.

 

If a pedophile sexually abuses a child, yes, hang them. Why do so many of you have a problem with that?

 

Everyone has a problem with paedophilia. The big question is what we actually do about the problem. The current solution, and the one you appear to be supporting, is to ignore it unless and until children actual get abused. The reason behind the idea of "destigmatising" is to allow the problem to be addressed before any children are harmed. If someone has any kind of psychological problem that makes them want to harm people, shouldn't ever effort be made to encourage them to seek the help and support to prevent that happening?

 

Because it'll go from there, to excluding different types of "others" and as I said: At which point, what did we fight the war for? If it's possible to treat, sedate and remove the ideology from our midst, that is much more preferable. Like, this topic is so poisonous(both academically and socially), one can't even have a nuanced discussion without supposedly being "on their side".

For far too long as a Western Society, we thought we could just ignore, prosecute and isolate this problem. As people here have noted(myself included), IT'S NOT WORKING.