UPDATE: "Non-Binary" University Instructor Calls To 'Destigmatize' Pedophilia

Not sure if you're referring to the smug creep in the pic, Poly .. but that's a woman.

But I agree she's almost certainly looking to perpetrate.

 

I'm not sure. I don't really care about that.

or already has.

 

At least you didn't deny he walked into the Miss Teen dressing room.

 

And that definition doesn't only include trans people. As some here think trans = pedo.

 

trans are not a political side. I am not trans either. So I don't know what you mean by my side.
I am hetero supposedly like you, so we are on the same side.

But if you mean my side as the University president on my side, yes, he did the correct thing.
Since I am on that side, you must be on the side of wanting pedo legitimized. Oh my.

 

The topic is adults and young kids. In trump case teen age girls.

 

And we shouldn't be doing either.

That's not a "key distinction" - it's a worthless fabrication that isn't going to do anything to remedy the attraction to children and the willingness to rape or sodomize them.

Wrong. It's the destigmatizartion of pedophilia that normalizes the attraction and encourages pedophiles to abuse children before they are harmed.

Bull. We don't destigmatize and normalize pyromania and arson for a reason, because it encourages people to start fires and burn buildings down.

 

This professor clearly is a pedo.

That doesn't mean other trans people are.

Trans activists should be against this guy

 

Huh? I’m guessing you haven’t read my comments on this.

 

I agree.

 

Exactly.
Trans really has nothing to do with pedo. Hence the fakeness of the OP.

 

Nor have you read mine. You projected wrong, I did the same back at you.
To show how stupid projections are.

 

I agree. The emphasis has to be on protecting children, not coddling sexual predators.

Either we defend the most vulnerable members of our society or we defend the wolves who prey on them.

 

Agreed. The fact that this pervert is trans really makes no difference.

 

Also helping victims deal with the trauma.

That's the pro violence of the left.

 

Absolutely. If we destigmatize and normalize pedophilia, rape, etc., we rob the victims of our support and their dignity. That's completely unacceptable, and it's not going to happen.

Perhaps. I'm more inclined to attribute it to the amorality and immortality of the radical Left that can be traced back to the French Revolution, if not further.

 

I think it's worse than that. If we destigmatize pedophilia it tells victims that they aren't victims, they are perpetrators.

It is too normalize this perversion nothing more.

Valuelessness among people who are capable of values is malice.

 

Where did I “project” wrongly with you?

 

Your entire projection. Way off base. Wanting it in elementary schools. Get real. Stop the BS.

 

I don’t want it in elementary schools. Do you?

 

I disagree with that. Victims of statutory rape of any form(be it a child molester or a violent stalker at night on a woman(or guy, because that can happen) are victims. At the same time, if they could hypothetically come forward and get treatment for their sexual problems I see that as a benefit both to them, and to their would-be victims(hopefully there's a lot less of them(ie: none at all.)

I just don't see how extending a sympathetic hand to one, means that you can't extend a sympathetic hand to another. And I don't see how it undermines the need to protect children, women, those who are violated in general.

Does anyone think the child victim for example care if the pedophile gets treatment for their perversions? Actually, I think the child victim would think more along similar lines: That they won't be able to do it to another child.

 

I don't think I really understand what you're saying here or how it relates to what I said.

I stated that the destigmatizing sex offenders stigmatizes victims.

That doesn't help anybody to destigmatize them. All it does is say it's okay
[QUOTE[
I just don't see how extending a sympathetic hand to one, means that you can't extend a sympathetic hand to another.[/QUOTE] a sex offender needs to earn sympathy. A victim deserves it.

because it legitimizes sexual abuse.

the only treatment that exists is lethal injection. You can't fix that. Mental disorders cannot be treated they cannot be cured they simply have to be coped with.

A victim wouldn't have any more ability to treat someone like this then any professional.

It would be wonderful if we could stop this but by the time they're perpetrating sex offense it is too late. Recidivism among sex offenders is the highest of all criminal behaviors.

 

I wasn't inferring that the victim would treat the professional. So let's say that I were attacked in, let's say the knock out game. Let's get away from this morbid topic and let's use another different example. Some person attacked me because they hate how I look(ie: I'm attacked by a racist.). If for some reason I were to learn that this racist would get help, and would denounce racist views in the future I'm glad that in the end, this person got better.

If I were(and I was, so I should say if the person who raped me got treatment for it), I would be happy that if the person completed the treatment and never touched another minor ever again then that's a good thing. Maybe it is indeed unforgivable to the point of beyond salvation, but I'd like to be optimistic to think no person is beyond salvation. That there's something we as a society can do to aid in that salvation process. But if there truly isn't, then /shrug. Oh well.

 

Conversely, it tells pedophiles that the children they violate aren't victims.

Agreed...

Valuelessness among people who are capable of values is Nihilism, and usually that goes hand-in-hand with malice (in politics, it always does).

History repeating itself, over and over again...



You've often heard me say that "progressives" aren't progressives - they're Nihilists. That's why they want to fundamentally transform America:



Same goes for the Anarchists and Anarcho-Marxists (ex., AntiFa) who want to destroy it:



They're not shy about what they want.

Neither were the Nihilists in Dostoevsky's Demons. They were proud of their nihilism and malice, hacking at the pillars of society - its mores, its norms, its institutions - until society could no longer defend itself.

Dostoevsky saw the storm coming, and on the other side of that storm the great Soviet dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn had a warning for us:

It is with a strange feeling that those of us from the Soviet Union look upon the West of today. It is though we were neither neighbors on the same planet nor contemporaries. And yet we contemplate the West from what will be your future, or we look back seventy years to see our past suddenly repeating itself today. And what we see is always the same as it was then: adults deferring to the opinions of children, the younger generation carried away by shallow, worthless ideas; professors scared of being unfashionable; journalists refusing to take responsibility for the words they squander so easily; universal sympathy for revolutionary extremists; people with serious objections unable or unwilling to voice them; the majority passively obsessed with a feeling of doom; feeble governments; societies whose defensive reactions have become paralyzed; spiritual confusion leading to political upheaval. What will happen as a result of all this lies ahead of us. But the time is near, and from bitter memory we can easily predict what these events will be.

It's here.

 

I would say nihilism is malice. Indifference is evil more so than hate.

It's creepy how people don't seem to understand what's going on or they don't care.